CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Trapped-ion two-qubit gates with >99.99% fidelity without ground-state cooling

Open access
Hughes, A. C., Srinivas, R., Löschnauer, C. M., Knaack, H. M., Matt, R., Ballance, C. J., Malinowski, M., Harty, T. P., Sutherland, R. T.·2025·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2510.17286arXiv 2510.17286
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We introduce the 'smooth gate', an entangling method for trapped-ion qubits where residual spin-motion entanglement errors are adiabatically eliminated by ramping the gate detuning. We demonstrate electronically controlled two-qubit gates with an estimated error of $8.4(7)\times10^{-5}$ without ground-state cooling. We further show that the error remains $\lesssim 5\times10^{-4}$ for ions with average phonon occupation up to $\bar{n}=9.4(3)$ on the gate mode. These results indicate that trapped-ion quantum computation can achieve high fidelity at temperatures above the Doppler limit, which enables faster and simpler device operation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2510.17286

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trapped-ion platforms have demonstrated the highest gate fidelities of any modality.

    “Trapped-ion platforms have demonstrated the highest gate fidelities of any modality2–6 but scaling to larger qubit numbers while preserving performance has remained a central challenge.”

    From A 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer with all-to-all connectivity (2026) · cites this paper as [5]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hughes, A. C., Srinivas, R., Löschnauer, C. M., Knaack, H. M., Matt, R., Ballance, C. J., Malinowski, M., Harty, T. P., & Sutherland, R. T.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2510.17286
arXiv
2510.17286
OpenAlex
W4415963278
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Keywords
trapped-ion qubits, two-qubit gates, adiabatic elimination, gate fidelity, phonon occupation, entangling gates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review