PreprintCited by 1Machine Learning in HealthcareSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentHealthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring

Towards actionable hypotension prediction - predicting catecholamine therapy initiation in the intensive care unit

Open access
Koebe, Richard, Saibel, Noah, Alcaraz, Juan Miguel Lopez, Schäfer, Simon, Strodthoff, Nils·2025·arXiv

Abstract

Hypotension in critically ill ICU patients is common and life-threatening. Escalation to catecholamine therapy marks a key management step, with both undertreatment and overtreatment posing risks. Most machine learning (ML) models predict hypotension using fixed MAP thresholds or MAP forecasting, overlooking the clinical decision behind treatment escalation. Predicting catecholamine initiation, the start of vasoactive or inotropic agent administration offers a more clinically actionable target reflecting real decision-making. Using the MIMIC-III database, we modeled catecholamine initiation as a binary event within a 15-minute prediction window. Input features included statistical descriptors from a two-hour sliding MAP context window, along with demographics, biometrics, comorbidities, and ongoing treatments. An Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model was trained and interpreted via SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). The model achieved an AUROC of 0.822 (0.813-0.830), outperforming the hypotension baseline (MAP < 65, AUROC 0.686 [0.675-0.699]). SHAP analysis highlighted recent MAP values, MAP trends, and ongoing treatments (e.g., sedatives, electrolytes) as dominant predictors. Subgroup analysis showed higher performance in males, younger patients (<53 years), those with higher BMI (>32), and patients without comorbidities or concurrent medications. Predicting catecholamine initiation based on MAP dynamics, treatment context, and patient characteristics supports the critical decision of when to escalate therapy, shifting focus from threshold-based alarms to actionable decision support. This approach is feasible across a broad ICU cohort under natural event imbalance. Future work should enrich temporal and physiological context, extend label definitions to include therapy escalation, and benchmark against existing hypotension prediction systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2510.24287

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Akiba T, Sano S, Yanase T, et al (2019) Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery &amp; data mining, pp 2623-2631
  2. Bergstra J, Bardenet R, Bengio Y, et al (2011) Algorithms for hyper-parameter optimization. Advances in neural information processing systems 24
  3. Carrington AM, Manuel DG, Fieguth PW, et al (2023) Deep roc analysis and auc as balanced average accuracy, for improved classifier selection, audit and explanation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 45(1):329-341. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2022.3145392, URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3145392 · DOI
  4. Chen GS, Lee T, Tsang JL, et al (2025a) Machine learning accurately predicts need for critical care support in patients admitted to hospital for community-acquired pneumonia. Critical Care Explorations 7(6):e1262. https://doi.org/10.1097/cce. 0000000000001262, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001262 · DOI
  5. Chen R, Sharma S, Bhattacharya P (2025b) Hypotension. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/books/NBK499961/, URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499961/, updated 2025 May 3. Cited 2025 Aug 2
  6. Choi Y, Kim KH, Kim Y, et al (2024) Prediction of vasopressor needs in hypotensive emergency department patients using serial arterial blood pressure data with deep learning. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine 31(5):233-241. https://doi. org/10.1002/hkj2.12039, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hkj2.12039 · DOI
  7. Davies SJ, Sessler DI, Jian Z, et al (2024) Comparison of differences in cohort (forward) and case control (backward) methodologic approaches for validation of the hypotension prediction index. Anesthesiology 141(3):443-452. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln. 0000000000004989, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004989 · DOI
  8. De Backer D, Cecconi M, Chew MS, et al (2022) A plea for personalization of the hemodynamic management of septic shock. Critical Care 26(1). https://doi.org/10. 1186/s13054-022-04255-y, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04255-y · DOI
  9. Erickson N, Purucker L, Tschalzev A, et al (2025) Tabarena: A living benchmark for machine learning on tabular data. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2506.16791, URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.16791 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Hatib F, Jian Z, Buddi S, et al (2018) Machine-learning algorithm to predict hypotension based on high-fidelity arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anesthesiology 129(4):663-674
  11. He R, Chiang JN (2025) Simultaneous forecasting of vital sign trajectories in the icu. Scientific Reports 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99719-w, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99719-w · DOI
  12. Jeong H, Kim D, Kim DW, et al (2024) Prediction of intraoperative hypotension using deep learning models based on non-invasive monitoring devices. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 38(6):1357-1365. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10877-024-01206-6, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01206-6 · DOI
  13. Johnson A, Pollard T, Mark R (2023) Mimic-iii clinical database. https://doi.org/10. 13026/C2XW26, URL https://physionet.org/content/mimiciii/1.4/
  14. Johnson AEW, Stone DJ, Celi LA, et al (2017) The mimic code repository: enabling reproducibility in critical care research. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 25(1):32-39. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx084, URL https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx084, https://academic.oup.com/jamia/articlepdf/25/1/32/34149701/ocx084.pdf · DOI · Paper page
  15. Kapral L, Dibiasi C, Jeremic N, et al (2024) Development and external validation of temporal fusion transformer models for continuous intraoperative blood pressure forecasting. eClinicalMedicine 75:102797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102797, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102797 · DOI
  16. Kwak GH, Ling L, Hui P (2020) Predicting the need for vasopressors in the intensive care unit using an attention based deep learning model. Shock 56(1):73-79. https://doi.org/10.1097/shk.0000000000001692, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ SHK.0000000000001692 · DOI
  17. Lundberg SM, Erion G, Chen H, et al (2020) From local explanations to global understanding with explainable ai for trees. Nature Machine Intelligence 2(1):56-67. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9, URL http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/s42256-019-0138-9 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Michard F, Mulder MP, Gonzalez F, et al (2025) Ai for the hemodynamic assessment of critically ill and surgical patients: focus on clinical applications. Annals of Intensive Care 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01448-w, URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/s13613-025-01448-w · DOI
  19. Mukkamala R, Schnetz MP, Khanna AK, et al (2024) Intraoperative hypotension prediction: Current methods, controversies, and research outlook. Anesthesia &amp; Analgesia 141(1):61-73. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007216, URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007216 · DOI
  20. Mulder MP, Harmannij-Markusse M, Fresiello L, et al (2024) Hypotension prediction index is equally effective in predicting intraoperative hypotension during noncardiac surgery compared to a mean arterial pressure threshold: A prospective observational study. Anesthesiology 141(3):453-462. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln. 0000000000004990, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004990 · DOI
  21. Ohno K, Kumagai A (2021) Recurrent neural networks for learning long-term temporal dependencies with reanalysis of time scale representation. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Knowledge (ICBK). IEEE, p 182-189, https://doi.org/10.1109/ ickg52313.2021.00033, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICKG52313.2021.00033 · DOI
  22. Pal R, Le J, Rudas A, et al (2024) A review of machine learning methods for noninvasive blood pressure estimation. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 39(1):95-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01221-7, URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s10877-024-01221-7 · DOI
  23. Pilakouta Depaskouale MA, Archonta SA, Moutafidou SK, et al (2025) Effectiveness of hypotension prediction index software in reducing intraoperative hypotension in prolonged prone-position spine surgery: a single-center clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01303-0, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01303-0 · DOI
  24. Schenk J, van der Ven W, Schuurmans J, et al (2021) Definition and incidence of hypotension in intensive care unit patients, an international survey of the european society of intensive care medicine. Journal of Critical Care 65:142-148. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.05.023, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.05.023 · DOI
  25. Schuurmans J, Rellum SR, Schenk J, et al (2024) Effect of a machine learning-derived early warning tool with treatment protocol on hypotension during cardiac surgery and icu stay: The hypotension prediction 2 (hype-2) randomized clinical trial. Critical Care Medicine 53(2):e328-e340. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000006518, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006518 · DOI
  26. Shashikumar SP, Wardi G, Malhotra A, et al (2021) Artificial intelligence sepsis prediction algorithm learns to say 'i don't know'. npj Digital Medicine 4(1). https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41746-021-00504-6, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00504-6 · DOI
  27. Tenny S, Hoffman MR (2025) Prevalence. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL), URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430867/, [Updated 2023 May 22]
  28. Tschoellitsch T, Kaltenleithner S, Maletzky A, et al (2025) Mean arterial pressure is all you need in a machine learning model for mean arterial pressure prediction. European Journal of Anaesthesiology https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000002238, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002238 · DOI
  29. van der Ven W, Schuurmans J, Schenk J, et al (2022) Monitoring, management, and outcome of hypotension in intensive care unit patients, an international survey of the european society of intensive care medicine. Journal of Critical Care 67:118-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.10.008, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc. 2021.10.008 · DOI
  30. Vickers AJ, Elkin EB (2006) Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Medical Decision Making 26(6):565-574

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koebe, R., Saibel, N., Alcaraz, J. M. L., Schäfer, S., & Strodthoff, N.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
e0136-e0136
ISSN
2767-7206 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7102409773
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Anaesthesiology Intensive Care (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Keywords
hypotension prediction, treatment escalation, intensive care unit, sliding window features, XGBoost, SHAP, clinical decision support, MIMIC-III

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review