Towards actionable hypotension prediction - predicting catecholamine therapy initiation in the intensive care unit
Open accessAbstract
Hypotension in critically ill ICU patients is common and life-threatening. Escalation to catecholamine therapy marks a key management step, with both undertreatment and overtreatment posing risks. Most machine learning (ML) models predict hypotension using fixed MAP thresholds or MAP forecasting, overlooking the clinical decision behind treatment escalation. Predicting catecholamine initiation, the start of vasoactive or inotropic agent administration offers a more clinically actionable target reflecting real decision-making. Using the MIMIC-III database, we modeled catecholamine initiation as a binary event within a 15-minute prediction window. Input features included statistical descriptors from a two-hour sliding MAP context window, along with demographics, biometrics, comorbidities, and ongoing treatments. An Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model was trained and interpreted via SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). The model achieved an AUROC of 0.822 (0.813-0.830), outperforming the hypotension baseline (MAP < 65, AUROC 0.686 [0.675-0.699]). SHAP analysis highlighted recent MAP values, MAP trends, and ongoing treatments (e.g., sedatives, electrolytes) as dominant predictors. Subgroup analysis showed higher performance in males, younger patients (<53 years), those with higher BMI (>32), and patients without comorbidities or concurrent medications. Predicting catecholamine initiation based on MAP dynamics, treatment context, and patient characteristics supports the critical decision of when to escalate therapy, shifting focus from threshold-based alarms to actionable decision support. This approach is feasible across a broad ICU cohort under natural event imbalance. Future work should enrich temporal and physiological context, extend label definitions to include therapy escalation, and benchmark against existing hypotension prediction systems.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Akiba T, Sano S, Yanase T, et al (2019) Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining, pp 2623-2631
- Bergstra J, Bardenet R, Bengio Y, et al (2011) Algorithms for hyper-parameter optimization. Advances in neural information processing systems 24
- Carrington AM, Manuel DG, Fieguth PW, et al (2023) Deep roc analysis and auc as balanced average accuracy, for improved classifier selection, audit and explanation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 45(1):329-341. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2022.3145392, URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3145392 · DOI
- Chen GS, Lee T, Tsang JL, et al (2025a) Machine learning accurately predicts need for critical care support in patients admitted to hospital for community-acquired pneumonia. Critical Care Explorations 7(6):e1262. https://doi.org/10.1097/cce. 0000000000001262, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001262 · DOI
- Chen R, Sharma S, Bhattacharya P (2025b) Hypotension. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/books/NBK499961/, URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499961/, updated 2025 May 3. Cited 2025 Aug 2
- Choi Y, Kim KH, Kim Y, et al (2024) Prediction of vasopressor needs in hypotensive emergency department patients using serial arterial blood pressure data with deep learning. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine 31(5):233-241. https://doi. org/10.1002/hkj2.12039, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hkj2.12039 · DOI
- Davies SJ, Sessler DI, Jian Z, et al (2024) Comparison of differences in cohort (forward) and case control (backward) methodologic approaches for validation of the hypotension prediction index. Anesthesiology 141(3):443-452. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln. 0000000000004989, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004989 · DOI
- De Backer D, Cecconi M, Chew MS, et al (2022) A plea for personalization of the hemodynamic management of septic shock. Critical Care 26(1). https://doi.org/10. 1186/s13054-022-04255-y, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04255-y · DOI
- Erickson N, Purucker L, Tschalzev A, et al (2025) Tabarena: A living benchmark for machine learning on tabular data. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2506.16791, URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.16791 · DOI · Paper page
- Hatib F, Jian Z, Buddi S, et al (2018) Machine-learning algorithm to predict hypotension based on high-fidelity arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anesthesiology 129(4):663-674
- He R, Chiang JN (2025) Simultaneous forecasting of vital sign trajectories in the icu. Scientific Reports 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99719-w, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99719-w · DOI
- Jeong H, Kim D, Kim DW, et al (2024) Prediction of intraoperative hypotension using deep learning models based on non-invasive monitoring devices. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 38(6):1357-1365. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10877-024-01206-6, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01206-6 · DOI
- Johnson A, Pollard T, Mark R (2023) Mimic-iii clinical database. https://doi.org/10. 13026/C2XW26, URL https://physionet.org/content/mimiciii/1.4/
- Johnson AEW, Stone DJ, Celi LA, et al (2017) The mimic code repository: enabling reproducibility in critical care research. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 25(1):32-39. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx084, URL https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx084, https://academic.oup.com/jamia/articlepdf/25/1/32/34149701/ocx084.pdf · DOI · Paper page
- Kapral L, Dibiasi C, Jeremic N, et al (2024) Development and external validation of temporal fusion transformer models for continuous intraoperative blood pressure forecasting. eClinicalMedicine 75:102797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102797, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102797 · DOI
- Kwak GH, Ling L, Hui P (2020) Predicting the need for vasopressors in the intensive care unit using an attention based deep learning model. Shock 56(1):73-79. https://doi.org/10.1097/shk.0000000000001692, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ SHK.0000000000001692 · DOI
- Lundberg SM, Erion G, Chen H, et al (2020) From local explanations to global understanding with explainable ai for trees. Nature Machine Intelligence 2(1):56-67. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9, URL http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/s42256-019-0138-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Michard F, Mulder MP, Gonzalez F, et al (2025) Ai for the hemodynamic assessment of critically ill and surgical patients: focus on clinical applications. Annals of Intensive Care 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01448-w, URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/s13613-025-01448-w · DOI
- Mukkamala R, Schnetz MP, Khanna AK, et al (2024) Intraoperative hypotension prediction: Current methods, controversies, and research outlook. Anesthesia & Analgesia 141(1):61-73. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007216, URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007216 · DOI
- Mulder MP, Harmannij-Markusse M, Fresiello L, et al (2024) Hypotension prediction index is equally effective in predicting intraoperative hypotension during noncardiac surgery compared to a mean arterial pressure threshold: A prospective observational study. Anesthesiology 141(3):453-462. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln. 0000000000004990, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004990 · DOI
- Ohno K, Kumagai A (2021) Recurrent neural networks for learning long-term temporal dependencies with reanalysis of time scale representation. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Knowledge (ICBK). IEEE, p 182-189, https://doi.org/10.1109/ ickg52313.2021.00033, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICKG52313.2021.00033 · DOI
- Pal R, Le J, Rudas A, et al (2024) A review of machine learning methods for noninvasive blood pressure estimation. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 39(1):95-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01221-7, URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s10877-024-01221-7 · DOI
- Pilakouta Depaskouale MA, Archonta SA, Moutafidou SK, et al (2025) Effectiveness of hypotension prediction index software in reducing intraoperative hypotension in prolonged prone-position spine surgery: a single-center clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01303-0, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01303-0 · DOI
- Schenk J, van der Ven W, Schuurmans J, et al (2021) Definition and incidence of hypotension in intensive care unit patients, an international survey of the european society of intensive care medicine. Journal of Critical Care 65:142-148. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.05.023, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.05.023 · DOI
- Schuurmans J, Rellum SR, Schenk J, et al (2024) Effect of a machine learning-derived early warning tool with treatment protocol on hypotension during cardiac surgery and icu stay: The hypotension prediction 2 (hype-2) randomized clinical trial. Critical Care Medicine 53(2):e328-e340. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000006518, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006518 · DOI
- Shashikumar SP, Wardi G, Malhotra A, et al (2021) Artificial intelligence sepsis prediction algorithm learns to say 'i don't know'. npj Digital Medicine 4(1). https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41746-021-00504-6, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00504-6 · DOI
- Tenny S, Hoffman MR (2025) Prevalence. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL), URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430867/, [Updated 2023 May 22]
- Tschoellitsch T, Kaltenleithner S, Maletzky A, et al (2025) Mean arterial pressure is all you need in a machine learning model for mean arterial pressure prediction. European Journal of Anaesthesiology https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000002238, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002238 · DOI
- van der Ven W, Schuurmans J, Schenk J, et al (2022) Monitoring, management, and outcome of hypotension in intensive care unit patients, an international survey of the european society of intensive care medicine. Journal of Critical Care 67:118-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.10.008, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc. 2021.10.008 · DOI
- Vickers AJ, Elkin EB (2006) Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Medical Decision Making 26(6):565-574
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alcaraz, J. M. L., Moran, X. L., Zaragoza, E. D., Händel, C., Koebe, R., Haverkamp, W., & Strodthoff, N. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.06645
“Overall, integrating ECG waveforms into ICU decision support models could enhance early risk stratification, guide treatment prioritization [21], and improve monitoring of high-risk patients for deterioration events.”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Koebe, R., Saibel, N., Alcaraz, J. M. L., Schäfer, S., & Strodthoff, N.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e0136-e0136
- ISSN
- 2767-7206 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2510.24287
- OpenAlex
- W7102409773
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- European Journal of Anaesthesiology Intensive Care (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
- Keywords
- hypotension prediction, treatment escalation, intensive care unit, sliding window features, XGBoost, SHAP, clinical decision support, MIMIC-III
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review