CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 5Topic ModelingMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsNatural Language Processing Techniques

Mitigating Hallucination in Large Language Models: A Capability-Oriented Survey on RAG, Reasoning, and Agentic Systems

Open access
Li, Yihan, Fu, Xiyuan, Verma, Ghanshyam, Buitelaar, Paul, Liu, Mingming·2025·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2510.24476arXiv 2510.24476
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Hallucination remains one of the key obstacles to the reliable deployment of large language models (LLMs). Although various mitigation approaches have been proposed, existing studies often analyze different technical paradigms independently, lacking a unified perspective to understand the underlying mechanisms of different approaches and their correspondence with different types of hallucinations. This survey adopts a capability enhancement perspective to systematically examine hallucination mitigation approaches, focusing on Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), reasoning enhancement, and their integration within agentic systems. Based on their primary mitigation mechanisms, we categorize hallucinations into knowledge-based hallucinations and logic-based hallucinations, analyze how RAG and reasoning enhancement methods respectively improve knowledge acquisition and reasoning reliability, and further discuss the integration mechanisms of retrieval and reasoning capabilities in Agentic Systems for mitigating composite hallucinations. By considering the applicability, mitigation mechanisms, and limitations of different approaches, this survey establishes a unified analytical framework connecting hallucination types, key capability dimensions, and technical paradigms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2510.24476

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The validation approach combines grounding strategies from retrieval-augmented generation and constrained decoding with domain-specific validators (DOI resolution, unit parsing, code execution) tailored to quantitative scientific extraction.

    “The validation approach combines grounding strategies from retrieval‐augmented generation [30] and constrained decoding [31] with domain‐specific validators (DOI resolution, unit parsing, code execution) tailored to quantitative scientific extraction.”

    From Structured Schemas for Provenance‐Rich, <scp>LLM</scp> ‐Assisted <scp>QSP</scp> Model Calibration (2026) · cites this paper as [30]

  • The validation approach combines grounding strategies from retrieval-augmented generation30 and constrained decoding31 with domain-specific validators (DOI resolution, unit parsing, code execution) tailored to quantitative scientific extraction.

    “The validation approach combines grounding strategies from retrieval-augmented generation30 and constrained decoding31 with domain-specific validators (DOI resolution, unit parsing, code execution)”

    From Structured Schemas for Provenance-Rich, LLM-Assisted QSP Model Calibration (2026) · cites this paper as [30]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 74

  1. Akari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2024. Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflection. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
  2. Amos Azaria and Tom Mitchell. 2023. The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lying. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023. 967-976.
  3. Sourav Banerjee, Ayushi Agarwal, and Saloni Singla. 2025. LLMs Will Always Hallucinate, and We Need to Live with This. In Intelligent Systems Conference. 624-648.
  4. Christopher Burges, Robert Ragno, and Quoc Le. 2006. Learning to Rank with Nonsmooth Cost Functions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19 (2006).
  5. Chi-Min Chan, Chunpu Xu, Ruibin Yuan, Hongyin Luo, Wei Xue, Yike Guo, and Jie Fu. 2024. RQ-RAG: Learning to Refine Queries for Retrieval Augmented Generation. In First Conference on Language Modeling. https://openreview.net/forum?id=tzE7VqsaJ4
  6. Sijia Chen, Yibo Wang, Yi-Feng Wu, Qing-Guo Chen, Zhao Xu, Weihua Luo, Kaifu Zhang, and Lijun Zhang. 2024. Advancing Tool-Augmented Large Language Models: Integrating Insights from Errors in Inference Trees. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, A.
  7. Globerson, L. Mackey, D. Belgrave, A. Fan, U. Paquet, J. Tomczak, and C. Zhang (Eds.), Vol. 37. Curran Associates, Inc., 106555-106581.
  8. Wenhu Chen, Xueguang Ma, Xinyi Wang, and William W. Cohen. 2023. Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Tasks. Transactions on Machine Learning Research (2023). https://openreview.net/forum?id=YfZ4ZPt8zd
  9. Fengxiang Cheng, Haoxuan Li, Fenrong Liu, Robert van Rooij, Kun Zhang, and Zhouchen Lin. 2025. Empowering LLMs with Logical Reasoning: A Comprehensive Survey. In Proceedings of the 34th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI).
  10. Yung-Sung Chuang, Yujia Xie, Hongyin Luo, Yoon Kim, James R. Glass, and Pengcheng He. 2024. DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language Models. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
  11. Guanting Dong, Jiajie Jin, Xiaoxi Li, Yutao Zhu, Zhicheng Dou, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2025. Rag-critic: Leveraging automated critic-guided agentic workflow for retrieval augmented generation. In Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 3551-3578.
  12. Darren Edge, Ha Trinh, Newman Cheng, Joshua Bradley, Alex Chao, Apurva Mody, Steven Truitt, Dasha Metropolitansky, Robert Osazuwa Ness, and Jonathan Larson. 2025. From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarization. arXiv:2404.16130 [cs] doi:10.48550/arXiv.2404.16130 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Sebastian Farquhar, Jannik Kossen, Lorenz Kuhn, and Yarin Gal. 2024. Detecting hallucinations in large language models using semantic entropy. Nature 630, 8017 (2024), 625-630.
  14. Yichao Fu, Junda Chen, Yonghao Zhuang, Zheyu Fu, Ion Stoica, and Hao Zhang. 2025. Reasoning Without Self-Doubt: More Efficient Chain-of- Thought Through Certainty Probing. In ICLR 2025 Workshop on Foundation Models in the Wild.
  15. Silin Gao, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Ping Yu, Xiaoqing Ellen Tan, Ramakanth Pasunuru, Olga Golovneva, Koustuv Sinha, Asli Celikyilmaz, Antoine Bosselut, and Tianlu Wang. 2025. Efficient Tool Use with Chain-of-Abstraction Reasoning. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING). 2727-2743.
  16. Sirui Hong, Mingchen Zhuge, Jonathan Chen, Xiawu Zheng, Yuheng Cheng, Jinlin Wang, Ceyao Zhang, Steven Yau, Zijuan Lin, Liyang Zhou, et al. 2024. MetaGPT: Meta programming for a multi-agent collaborative framework. In International Conference on Learning Representations, Vol. 2024. 23247-23275.
  17. Gautier Izacard, Mathilde Caron, Lucas Hosseini, Sebastian Riedel, Piotr Bojanowski, Armand Joulin, and Edouard Grave. 2022. Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learning. Transactions on Machine Learning Research (2022).
  18. Yubin Kim, Hyewon Jeong, Shan Chen, Shuyue Stella Li, Mingyu Lu, Kumail Alhamoud, Jimin Mun, Cristina Grau, Minseok Jung, Rodrigo Gameiro, Lizhou Fan, Eugene Park, Tristan Lin, Joonsik Yoon, Wonjin Yoon, Maarten Sap, Yulia Tsvetkov, Paul Liang, Xuhai Xu, Xin Liu, Daniel McDuff, Hyeonhoon Lee, Hae Won Park, Samir Tulebaev, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2025. Medical Hallucinations in Foundation Models and Their Impact on Healthcare. arXiv:2503.05777 [cs] doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.05777 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Takeshi Kojima, Shixiang Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo, and Yusuke Iwasawa. 2022. Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners. In Proceedings of NeurIPS 2022, Vol. 35. 22199-22213.
  20. Kuang-Huei Lee, Xinyun Chen, Hiroki Furuta, John Canny, and Ian Fischer. 2024. A Human-Inspired Reading Agent with Gist Memory of Very Long Contexts. In Proceedings of ICML 2024. 1054-1074.
  21. Nayeon Lee, Wei Ping, Peng Xu, Mostofa Patwary, Pascale N Fung, Mohammad Shoeybi, and Bryan Catanzaro. 2022. Factuality Enhanced Language Models for Open-Ended Text Generation. In Proceedings of NeurIPS 2022, Vol. 35. 34586-34599.
  22. Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Heinrich Küttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rocktäschel, Sebastian Riedel, and Douwe Kiela. 2020. Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks. In Proceedings of NeurIPS 2020, Vol. 33. 9459-9474.
  23. Kun Li, Tingzhang Zhao, Wei Zhou, and Songlin Hu. 2025. DORA: Dynamic optimization prompt for continuous reflection of LLM-based agent. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 7546-7557.
  24. Xinzhe Li. 2025. A review of prominent paradigms for llm-based agents: Tool use, planning (including rag), and feedback learning. In Proceedings of the 31st international conference on computational linguistics. 9760-9779.
  25. Yangning Li, Weizhi Zhang, Yuyao Yang, Wei-Chieh Huang, Yaozu Wu, Junyu Luo, Yuanchen Bei, Henry Peng Zou, Xiao Luo, Yusheng Zhao, et al. 2025. A Survey of RAG-Reasoning Systems in Large Language Models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025. 12120-12145.
  26. Jintao Liang, Huifeng Lin, You Wu, Rui Zhao, Ziyue Li, et al. 2025. Reasoning rag via system 1 or system 2: A survey on reasoning agentic retrieval-augmented generation for industry challenges. In Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 4th Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 1954-1966.
  27. Xixun Lin, Yucheng Ning, Jingwen Zhang, Yan Dong, Yilong Liu, Yongxuan Wu, Xiaohua Qi, Nan Sun, Yanmin Shang, Pengfei Cao, Lixin Zou, Xu Chen, Chuan Zhou, Jia Wu, Shirui Pan, Bin Wang, Yanan Cao, Kai Chen, Songlin Hu, and Li Guo. 2025. LLM-based Agents Suffer from Hallucinations: A Survey of Taxonomy, Methods, and Directions. arXiv:2509.18970 [cs] doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.18970 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Zhan Ling, Yunhao Fang, Xuanlin Li, Zhiao Huang, Mingu Lee, Roland Memisevic, and Hao Su. 2023. Deductive Verification of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning. In Proceedings of NeurIPS 2023, Vol. 36. 36407-36433.
  29. Bingbin Liu, Jordan Ash, Surbhi Goel, Akshay Krishnamurthy, and Cyril Zhang. 2023. Exposing Attention Glitches with Flip-Flop Language Modeling. In Proceedings of NeurIPS 2023, Vol. 36. 25549-25583.
  30. Jian Liu, Leyang Cui, Hanmeng Liu, Dandan Huang, Yile Wang, and Yue Zhang. 2021. LogiQA: A Challenge Dataset for Machine Reading Comprehension with Logical Reasoning. In Proceedings of IJCAI 2021. 501-507.
  31. Qi Liu, Haozhe Duan, Yiqun Chen, Quanfeng Lu, Weiwei Sun, and Jiaxin Mao. 2025. LLM4Ranking: An Easy-to-use Framework of Utilizing Large Language Models for Document Reranking. arXiv:2504.07439 [cs] doi:10.48550/arXiv.2504.07439 · DOI
  32. Ryan Liu, Jiayi Geng, Addison J. Wu, Ilia Sucholutsky, Tania Lombrozo, and Thomas L. Griffiths. 2025. Mind Your Step (by Step): Chain-of-Thought Can Reduce Performance on Tasks Where Thinking Makes Humans Worse. In Proceedings of ICML 2025.
  33. Xiao Liu, Hao Yu, Hanchen Zhang, Yifan Xu, Xuanyu Lei, Hanyu Lai, Yu Gu, Hangliang Ding, Kaiwen Men, Kejuan Yang, Shudan Zhang, Xiang Deng, Aohan Zeng, Zhengxiao Du, Chenhui Zhang, Sheng Shen, Tianjun Zhang, Yu Su, Huan Sun, Minlie Huang, Yuxiao Dong, and Jie Tang. 2024. AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents. In Proceedings of ICLR 2024.
  34. Shengjie Ma, Chengjin Xu, Xuhui Jiang, Muzhi Li, Huaren Qu, Cehao Yang, Jiaxin Mao, and Jian Guo. 2025. Think-on-Graph 2.0: Deep and Faithful Large Language Model Reasoning with Knowledge-Guided Retrieval Augmented Generation. In Proceedings of ICLR 2025.
  35. Xinbei Ma, Yeyun Gong, Pengcheng He, Hai Zhao, and Nan Duan. 2023. Query Rewriting in Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2023.
  36. Aman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan, Luyu Gao, Sarah Wiegreffe, Uri Alon, Nouha Dziri, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Yiming Yang, et al. 2023. Self-refine: Iterative refinement with self-feedback. Advances in neural information processing systems 36 (2023), 46534-46594.
  37. Seyed Iman Mirzadeh, Keivan Alizadeh, Hooman Shahrokhi, Oncel Tuzel, Samy Bengio, and Mehrdad Farajtabar. 2025. GSM-Symbolic: Under- standing the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models. In Proceedings of ICLR 2025.
  38. Abhika Mishra, Akari Asai, Vidhisha Balachandran, Yizhong Wang, Graham Neubig, Yulia Tsvetkov, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2024. Fine-Grained Hallucination Detection and Editing for Language Models. In Proceedings of the First Conference on Language Modeling.
  39. Eric Mitchell, Yoonho Lee, Alexander Khazatsky, Christopher D. Manning, and Chelsea Finn. 2023. DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection Using Probability Curvature. In Proceedings of ICML 2023.
  40. Eric Mitchell, Charles Lin, Antoine Bosselut, Chelsea Finn, and Christopher D. Manning. 2022. Fast Model Editing at Scale. In Proceedings of ICLR 2022.
  41. Niklas Muennighoff, Zitong Yang, Weijia Shi, Xiang Lisa Li, Li Fei-Fei, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Luke Zettlemoyer, Percy Liang, Emmanuel Candes, and Tatsunori Hashimoto. 2025. s1: Simple Test-Time Scaling. In Workshop on Reasoning and Planning for Large Language Models.
  42. Uzma Nawaz, Mufti Anees-ur Rahaman, and Zubair Saeed. 2025. A review of neuro-symbolic AI integrating reasoning and learning for advanced cognitive systems. Intelligent Systems with Applications (2025), 200541.
  43. Long Ouyang, Jeff Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll L Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, et al. 2022. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 27730-27744.
  44. Boci Peng, Yun Zhu, Yongchao Liu, Xiaohe Bo, Haizhou Shi, Chuntao Hong, Yan Zhang, and Siliang Tang. 2025. Graph retrieval-augmented generation: A survey. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 44, 2 (2025), 1-52.
  45. Yujia Qin, Shihao Liang, Yining Ye, Kunlun Zhu, Lan Yan, Yaxi Lu, Yankai Lin, Xin Cong, Xiangru Tang, Bill Qian, Sihan Zhao, Lauren Hong, Runchu Tian, Ruobing Xie, Jie Zhou, Dahai Li, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, and Mark Gerstein. 2024. ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-World APIs. In Proceedings of ICLR 2024.
  46. Luc De Raedt, Sebastijan Dumančić, Robin Manhaeve, and Giuseppe Marra. 2021. From Statistical Relational to Neural-Symbolic Artificial Intelligence. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 688-695.
  47. Stephen Robertson, Hugo Zaragoza, et al. 2009. The probabilistic relevance framework: BM25 and beyond. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval 3, 4 (2009), 333-389.
  48. Abulhair Saparov and He He. 2023. Language Models Are Greedy Reasoners: A Systematic Formal Analysis of Chain-of-Thought. In Proceedings of ICLR 2023.
  49. Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessi, Roberta Raileanu, Maria Lomeli, Eric Hambro, Luke Zettlemoyer, Nicola Cancedda, and Thomas Scialom. 2023. Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 36. 68539-68551.
  50. Noah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan, and Shunyu Yao. 2023. Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning. Advances in neural information processing systems 36 (2023), 8634-8652.
  51. Aarohi Srivastava, Abhinav Rastogi, Abhishek Rao, Abu Awal Md Shoeb, Abubakar Abid, Adam Fisch, Adam R. Brown, Adam Santoro, Aditya Gupta, Adrià Garriga-Alonso, et al. 2023. Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and Extrapolating the Capabilities of Language Models. Transactions on Machine Learning Research (2023).
  52. Jiashuo Sun, Chengjin Xu, Lumingyuan Tang, Saizhuo Wang, Chen Lin, Yeyun Gong, Lionel Ni, Heung-Yeung Shum, and Jian Guo. 2024. Think-on-Graph: Deep and Responsible Reasoning of Large Language Models on Knowledge Graphs. In Proceedings of ICLR 2024.
  53. Usman Tariq, Muhammad Abdullah Shah, and Adeel Khan. 2025. Explainable AI: A Retrieval-Augmented Generation Based Framework for Model Interpretability. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART). 948-955.
  54. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention Is All You Need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 5998-6008.
  55. Libo Wang. 2025. Dynamic Chain-of-Thought: Towards Adaptive Deep Reasoning. In Proceedings of Greeks in AI Symposium 2025.
  56. Xuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le, Ed H. Chi, Sharan Narang, Aakanksha Chowdhery, and Denny Zhou. 2023. Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models. In Proceedings of ICLR 2023.
  57. Ziqi Wang and Boqin Yuan. 2025. L-MARS: Legal Multi-Agent Workflow with Orchestrated Reasoning and Agentic Search. arXiv:2509.00761 [cs] doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.00761 · DOI
  58. William Watson, Nicole Cho, and Nishan Srishankar. 2025. Is There No Such Thing as a Bad Question? H4R: HalluciBot For Ratiocination, Rewriting, Ranking, and Routing. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 39. 25470-25478.
  59. Jason Wei, Yi Tay, Rishi Bommasani, Colin Raffel, Barret Zoph, Sebastian Borgeaud, Dani Yogatama, Maarten Bosma, Denny Zhou, Donald Metzler, Ed H. Chi, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Oriol Vinyals, Percy Liang, Jeff Dean, and William Fedus. 2022. Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models. Transactions on Machine Learning Research (2022).
  60. Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Brian Ichter, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc V. Le, and Denny Zhou. 2022. Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 35. 24824-24837.
  61. Haiyan Wu, Chenchen Wang, Chaoqun Sun, Chengxiong Lu, Yan-Hong Chen, Zhiqiang Zhang, and Xiaoqing Feng. 2026. Reflective RAG: Self-Evaluation Driven Strategy Optimization in Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026. 13252-13267.
  62. Jialong Wu, Wenbiao Yin, Yong Jiang, Zhenglin Wang, Zekun Xi, Runnan Fang, Linhai Zhang, Yulan He, Deyu Zhou, Pengjun Xie, and Fei Huang. 2025. WebWalker: Benchmarking LLMs in Web Traversal. In Workshop on Reasoning and Planning for Large Language Models.
  63. Qingyun Wu, Gagan Bansal, Jieyu Zhang, Yiran Wu, Beibin Li, Erkang Zhu, Li Jiang, Xiaoyun Zhang, Shaokun Zhang, Jiale Liu, et al. [n. d.]. AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation. In ICLR 2024 Workshop on Large Language Model (LLM) Agents.
  64. Shangyu Wu, Ying Xiong, Yufei Cui, Xue Liu, Buzhou Tang, Tei-Wei Kuo, and Chun Jason Xue. 2024. ReFusion: Improving Natural Language Understanding with Computation-Efficient Retrieval Representation Fusion. In Proceedings of ICLR 2024.
  65. Yunjia Xi, Jianghao Lin, Menghui Zhu, Yongzhao Xiao, Zhuoying Ou, Jiaqi Liu, Tong Wan, Bo Chen, Weiwen Liu, Yasheng Wang, Ruiming Tang, Weinan Zhang, and Yong Yu. 2025. InfoDeepSeek: Benchmarking Agentic Information Seeking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation. arXiv:2505.15872 [cs] doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.15872 · DOI
  66. Lee Xiong, Chenyan Xiong, Ye Li, Kwok-Fung Tang, Jialin Liu, Paul N. Bennett, Junaid Ahmed, and Arnold Overwijk. 2021. Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrieval. In International Conference on Learning Representations. https: //openreview.net/forum?id=zeFrfgyZln
  67. Ruyi Xu, Guangxuan Xiao, Haofeng Huang, Junxian Guo, and Song Han. 2025. XAttention: Block Sparse Attention with Antidiagonal Scoring. In Proceedings of ICML 2025.
  68. Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik R. Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. 2023. ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models. In Proceedings of ICLR 2023.
  69. Shi Yu, Chaoyue Tang, Bokai Xu, Junbo Cui, Junhao Ran, Yukun Yan, Zhenghao Liu, Shuo Wang, Xu Han, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. 2025. VisRAG: Vision-Based Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Multi-Modality Documents. In Proceedings of ICLR 2025.
  70. Weihao Yu, Zihang Jiang, Yanfei Dong, and Jiashi Feng. 2020. ReClor: A Reading Comprehension Dataset Requiring Logical Reasoning. In Proceedings of ICLR 2020.
  71. Beichen Zhang, Kun Zhou, Xilin Wei, Xin Zhao, Jing Sha, Shijin Wang, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2023. Evaluating and Improving Tool-Augmented Computation-Intensive Math Reasoning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 36. 23570-23589.
  72. Zijie Zhong, Hanwen Liu, Xiaoya Cui, Xiaofan Zhang, and Zengchang Qin. 2025. Mix-of-Granularity: Optimize the Chunking Granularity for Retrieval-Augmented Generation. In Proceedings of COLING 2025. 5756-5774.
  73. Huichi Zhou, Kin-Hei Lee, Zhonghao Zhan, Yue Chen, Zhenhao Li, Zhaoyang Wang, Hamed Haddadi, and Emine Yilmaz. 2025. TrustRAG: Enhancing Robustness and Trustworthiness in RAG. (Jan. 2025). arXiv:2501.00879 · arXiv
  74. Shengyao Zhuang, Xueguang Ma, Bevan Koopman, Jimmy Lin, and Guido Zuccon. 2025. Rank-R1: Enhancing Reasoning in LLM-based Document Rerankers via Reinforcement Learning. arXiv:2503.06034 [cs] doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.06034 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Y., Fu, X., Verma, G., Buitelaar, P., & Liu, M.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2510.24476
arXiv
2510.24476
OpenAlex
W7102398722
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Science Foundation Ireland (SFI/12/RC/, 12/RC/2289_P2, 12/RC/, SFI/12/RC/2289˙P2)
  • Dublin City University
  • Insight SFI Research Centre for Data Analytics (12 /RC/2289-P2, SFI/12/RC/2289/P_2)
  • European Regional Development Fund (SFI/12/RC/2289_P2, 12/RC/2289-P2)
  • Research Ireland (12-RC-2289-P2, SFI/12/RC/2289_P2)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
hallucination mitigation, large language models, retrieval-augmented generation, reasoning enhancement, agentic systems, hallucination taxonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review