PreprintCited by 1Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Mechanics and Applications

Certified randomness amplification by dynamically probing remote random quantum states

Open access
Liu, Minzhao, Niroula, Pradeep, DeCross, Matthew, Foreman, Cameron, Kon, Wen Yu, Primaatmaja, Ignatius William, Allman, M. S., Campora, J. P. +44 more·2025·arXiv

Abstract

Cryptography depends on truly unpredictable numbers, but physical sources emit biased or correlated bits. Quantum mechanics enables the amplification of imperfect randomness into nearly perfect randomness, but prior demonstrations have required physically co-located, loophole-free Bell tests, constraining the feasibility of remote operation. Here we realize certified randomness amplification across a network by dynamically probing large, entangled quantum states on Quantinuum's 98-qubit Helios trapped-ion quantum processor. Our protocol is secure even if the remote device acts maliciously or is compromised by an intercepting adversary, provided the samples are generated quickly enough to preclude classical simulation of the quantum circuits. We stream quantum gates in real time to the quantum processor, maintain quantum state coherence for $\approx 0.9$ seconds, and then reveal the measurement bases to the quantum processor only milliseconds before measurement. This limits the time for classical spoofing to 30 ms and constrains the location of hypothetical adversaries to a $4{,}500$ km radius. We achieve a fidelity of 0.586 on random circuits with 64 qubits and 276 two-qubit gates, enabling the amplification of realistic imperfect randomness with a low entropy rate into nearly perfect randomness.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2511.03686

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Helios is already enabling advancements in materials science and cryptography.

    “The cumulative impact of these advances enable us to scale the system size, from six qubits in the first QCCD quantum computer demonstrated five years ago21 to now 98 qubits, while setting a new state-of-the-art performance across all metrics, confirmed here by system benchmarks, including RCS, and seen in associated applications run on Helios in materials science and cryptography36–38.”
  • As reported in refs. 36-38, Helios is already enabling advancements in quantum simulations of superconductivity and in cryptographic protocols to generate certified randomness.

    “Indeed, as reported in refs. 36–38, Helios is already enabling advancements in quantum simulations of superconductivity and in cryptographic protocols to generate certified randomness.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, M., Niroula, P., DeCross, M., Foreman, C., Kon, W. Y., Primaatmaja, I. W., Allman, M. S., Campora, J. P., Isanaka, A., Singhal, K., Amer, O., Chakrabarti, S., Chakraborty, K., Cooper, S. F., Delaney, R. D., Dreiling, J. M., Estey, B., Figgatt, C., Foltz, C., Gaebler, J. P., Hall, A., He, Z., Holliman, C. A., Humble, T. S., Hung, S.-H., Husain, A. A., Jin, Y., Kaleoglu, F., Kennedy, C. J., Kotibhaskar, N., Lysne, N. K., Madjarov, I. S., Mills, M., Milne, A. R., Milner, K., Narmour, L., Omanakuttan, S., Park, A. J., Perlin, M. A., Reed, A. P., Self, C. N., Steinberg, M., Stephen, D. T., Sullivan, J., Chernoguzov, A., Curchod, F. J., Ransford, A., Bohnet, J. G., Neyenhuis, B., Foss-Feig, M., Otter, R., & Shaydulin, R.
Affiliations
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co (United States) (US)
  • Quantinuum (United States) (US)
  • Quantinuum (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Quantum Science Center (US)
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416020694
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE‐ AC02‐06CH11357, AC02‐06CH11357, 06CH11357, DE-AC02-)
  • Office of Science (AC02‐06CH11357, DE-AC02, 06CH11357, DE-AC02-06CH11357)
  • Advanced Scientific Computing Research (DE-AC02-06CH11357)
  • Argonne National Laboratory (DE- AC02-06-CH11357, DE-AC02, AC02–06CH11357, 06CH11357)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
certified randomness, entangled states, Bell nonlocality, trapped-ion quantum computer, quantum cryptography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review