Certified randomness amplification by dynamically probing remote random quantum states
Open accessAbstract
Cryptography depends on truly unpredictable numbers, but physical sources emit biased or correlated bits. Quantum mechanics enables the amplification of imperfect randomness into nearly perfect randomness, but prior demonstrations have required physically co-located, loophole-free Bell tests, constraining the feasibility of remote operation. Here we realize certified randomness amplification across a network by dynamically probing large, entangled quantum states on Quantinuum's 98-qubit Helios trapped-ion quantum processor. Our protocol is secure even if the remote device acts maliciously or is compromised by an intercepting adversary, provided the samples are generated quickly enough to preclude classical simulation of the quantum circuits. We stream quantum gates in real time to the quantum processor, maintain quantum state coherence for $\approx 0.9$ seconds, and then reveal the measurement bases to the quantum processor only milliseconds before measurement. This limits the time for classical spoofing to 30 ms and constrains the location of hypothetical adversaries to a $4{,}500$ km radius. We achieve a fidelity of 0.586 on random circuits with 64 qubits and 276 two-qubit gates, enabling the amplification of realistic imperfect randomness with a low entropy rate into nearly perfect randomness.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Helios is already enabling advancements in materials science and cryptography.
“The cumulative impact of these advances enable us to scale the system size, from six qubits in the first QCCD quantum computer demonstrated five years ago21 to now 98 qubits, while setting a new state-of-the-art performance across all metrics, confirmed here by system benchmarks, including RCS, and seen in associated applications run on Helios in materials science and cryptography36–38.”
From A 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer with all-to-all connectivity (2026) · cites this paper as [37]
As reported in refs. 36-38, Helios is already enabling advancements in quantum simulations of superconductivity and in cryptographic protocols to generate certified randomness.
“Indeed, as reported in refs. 36–38, Helios is already enabling advancements in quantum simulations of superconductivity and in cryptographic protocols to generate certified randomness.”
From A 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer with all-to-all connectivity (2026) · cites this paper as [37]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer with all-to-all connectivity
Ransford, A., Allman, M. S., Arkinstall, J., Campora, J. P., Cooper, S. F., Delaney, R. D., Dreiling, J. M., Estey, B., Figgatt, C., Hall, A., et al. (2026) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10676-4 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Liu, M., Niroula, P., DeCross, M., Foreman, C., Kon, W. Y., Primaatmaja, I. W., Allman, M. S., Campora, J. P., Isanaka, A., Singhal, K., Amer, O., Chakrabarti, S., Chakraborty, K., Cooper, S. F., Delaney, R. D., Dreiling, J. M., Estey, B., Figgatt, C., Foltz, C., Gaebler, J. P., Hall, A., He, Z., Holliman, C. A., Humble, T. S., Hung, S.-H., Husain, A. A., Jin, Y., Kaleoglu, F., Kennedy, C. J., Kotibhaskar, N., Lysne, N. K., Madjarov, I. S., Mills, M., Milne, A. R., Milner, K., Narmour, L., Omanakuttan, S., Park, A. J., Perlin, M. A., Reed, A. P., Self, C. N., Steinberg, M., Stephen, D. T., Sullivan, J., Chernoguzov, A., Curchod, F. J., Ransford, A., Bohnet, J. G., Neyenhuis, B., Foss-Feig, M., Otter, R., & Shaydulin, R.
- Affiliations
- JPMorgan Chase & Co (United States) (US)
- Quantinuum (United States) (US)
- Quantinuum (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Quantum Science Center (US)
- National Taiwan University (TW)
- ORCID
- Liu, Minzhao
- Niroula, Pradeep
- DeCross, Matthew
- Foreman, Cameron
- Kon, Wen Yu
- Primaatmaja, Ignatius William
- Singhal, Kartik
- Amer, Omar
- Chakrabarti, Shouvanik
- Chakraborty, Kaushik
- Delaney, Robert D.
- Dreiling, Joan M.
- Figgatt, Caroline
- Gaebler, John P.
- He, Zichang
- Holliman, Craig A.
- Humble, Travis S.
- Hung, Shih-Han
- Husain, Ali A.
- Kaleoglu, Fatih
- Kennedy, Colin J.
- Kotibhaskar, Nikhil
- Lysne, Nathan K.
- Milne, Alistair R.
- Narmour, Louis
- Omanakuttan, Sivaprasad
- Park, Annie J.
- Perlin, Michael A.
- Reed, Adam P.
- Self, Chris N.
- Steinberg, Matthew
- Stephen, David T.
- Sullivan, Joseph
- Curchod, Florian J.
- Ransford, Anthony
- Bohnet, Justin G.
- Neyenhuis, Brian
- Otter, Rob
- Shaydulin, Ruslan
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2511.03686
- OpenAlex
- W4416020694
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE‐ AC02‐06CH11357, AC02‐06CH11357, 06CH11357, DE-AC02-)
- Office of Science (AC02‐06CH11357, DE-AC02, 06CH11357, DE-AC02-06CH11357)
- Advanced Scientific Computing Research (DE-AC02-06CH11357)
- Argonne National Laboratory (DE- AC02-06-CH11357, DE-AC02, AC02–06CH11357, 06CH11357)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- certified randomness, entangled states, Bell nonlocality, trapped-ion quantum computer, quantum cryptography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review