PreprintCited by 2AI-based Problem Solving and PlanningReinforcement Learning in RoboticsArtificial Intelligence Applications

From Experience to Strategy: Empowering LLM Agents with Trainable Graph Memory

Open access
Xia, Siyu, Xu, Zekun, Chai, Jiajun, Fan, Wentian, Song, Yan, Wang, Xiaohan, Yin, Guojun, Lin, Wei +2 more·2025·arXiv

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) based agents have demonstrated remarkable potential in autonomous task-solving across complex, open-ended environments. A promising approach for improving the reasoning capabilities of LLM agents is to better utilize prior experiences in guiding current decisions. However, LLMs acquire experience either through implicit memory via training, which suffers from catastrophic forgetting and limited interpretability, or explicit memory via prompting, which lacks adaptability. In this paper, we introduce a novel agent-centric, trainable, multi-layered graph memory framework and evaluate how context memory enhances the ability of LLMs to utilize parametric information. The graph abstracts raw agent trajectories into structured decision paths in a state machine and further distills them into high-level, human-interpretable strategic meta-cognition. In order to make memory adaptable, we propose a reinforcement-based weight optimization procedure that estimates the empirical utility of each meta-cognition based on reward feedback from downstream tasks. These optimized strategies are then dynamically integrated into the LLM agent's training loop through meta-cognitive prompting. Empirically, the learnable graph memory delivers robust generalization, improves LLM agents' strategic reasoning performance, and provides consistent benefits during Reinforcement Learning (RL) training.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2511.07800

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ExpeL, From Experience to Strategy, and ReMe contrast successful and failed experiences to uncover holistic planning insights.

    “Combining both, ExpeL (Zhao et al., 2024), From Experience to Strategy (Xia et al., 2025), and ReMe (Cao et al., 2025b) contrast successful and failed experiences to uncover holistic planning insights.”

    From Memory in the Age of AI Agents (2025) · cites this paper as Xia et al., 2025

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Yuntao Bai, Andy Jones, Kamal Ndousse, Amanda Askell, Anna Chen, Nova DasSarma, Dawn Drain, Stanislav Fort, Deep Ganguli, Tom Henighan, Nicholas Joseph, Saurav Kadavath, Jackson Kernion, Tom Conerly, Sheer El-Showk, Nelson Elhage, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Danny Hernan- dez, Tristan Hume, Scott Johnston, Shauna Kravec, Liane Lovitt, Neel Nanda, Catherine Olsson, Dario Amodei, Tom Brown, Jack Clark, Sam McCandlish, Chris Olah, Ben Mann, and Jared Ka- plan. Training a helpful and harmless assistant with reinforcement learning from human feedback, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.05862. · arXiv
  2. Jiajun Chai, Guojun Yin, Zekun Xu, Chuhuai Yue, Yi Jia, Siyu Xia, Xiaohan Wang, Jiwen Jiang, Xiaoguang Li, Chengqi Dong, Hang He, and Wei Lin. Rlfactory: A plug-and-play reinforcement learning post-training framework for llm multi-turn tool-use, 2025. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2509.06980.
  3. Prateek Chhikara, Dev Khant, Saket Aryan, Taranjeet Singh, and Deshraj Yadav. Mem0: Building production-ready ai agents with scalable long-term memory, 2025. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2504.19413.
  4. Jiazhan Feng, Shijue Huang, Xingwei Qu, Ge Zhang, Yujia Qin, Baoquan Zhong, Chengquan Jiang, Jinxin Chi, and Wanjun Zhong. Retool: Reinforcement learning for strategic tool use in llms, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11536. · arXiv
  5. Leo Gao, Angela Beese, Max Fischer, Lariah Hou, Julia Kreutzer, Xi Victoria Lin, Jason Phang Wang, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Emiel van Miltenburg. Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04761, 2023. · arXiv
  6. Chia-Hsuan Ho, Shu-Hung Yeh, and Yun-Nung Chen. Constructing a multi-hop qa dataset via graph-based node ranking. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 6151-6161, 2020.
  7. Bowen Jin, Hansi Zeng, Zhenrui Yue, Jinsung Yoon, Sercan Arik, Dong Wang, Hamed Zamani, and Jiawei Han. Search-r1: Training llms to reason and leverage search engines with reinforcement learning, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.09516. · arXiv
  8. Mandar Joshi, Eunsol Choi, Daniel Weld, and Luke Zettlemoyer. Triviaqa: A large scale distantly supervised challenge dataset for reading comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.03551, 2017. · arXiv
  9. Vladimir Karpukhin, Barlas Oguz, Sewon Min, Patrick Lewis, Ledell Wu, Sergey Edunov, Danqi Chen, and Wen tau Yih. Dense passage retrieval for open-domain question answering, 2020. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.04906. · arXiv
  10. Tom Kwiatkowski, Jennimaria Palomaki, Olivia Redfield, Michael Collins, Ankur P Parikh, Chris Alberti, Danielle Epstein, Illia Polosukhin, Jacob Devlin, Kenton Lee, et al. Natural questions: a benchmark for question answering research. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019.
  11. Xiaoxi Li, Guanting Dong, Jiajie Jin, Yuyao Zhang, Yujia Zhou, Yutao Zhu, Peitian Zhang, and Zhicheng Dou. Search-o1: Agentic search-enhanced large reasoning models, 2025a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.05366. · arXiv
  12. Zhiyu Li, Shichao Song, Chenyang Xi, Hanyu Wang, Chen Tang, Simin Niu, Ding Chen, Jiawei Yang, Chunyu Li, Qingchen Yu, Jihao Zhao, Yezhaohui Wang, Peng Liu, Zehao Lin, Pengyuan Wang, Jiahao Huo, Tianyi Chen, Kai Chen, Kehang Li, Zhen Tao, Huayi Lai, Hao Wu, Bo Tang, Zhenren Wang, Zhaoxin Fan, Ningyu Zhang, Linfeng Zhang, Junchi Yan, Mingchuan Yang, Tong Xu, Wei Xu, Huajun Chen, Haofen Wang, Hongkang Yang, Wentao Zhang, Zhi-Qin John Xu, Siheng Chen, and Feiyu Xiong. Memos: A memory os for ai system, 2025b. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2507.03724.
  13. Hao Liu, Zhengren Wang, Xi Chen, Zhiyu Li, Feiyu Xiong, Qinhan Yu, and Wentao Zhang. Hoprag: Multi-hop reasoning for logic-aware retrieval-augmented generation, 2025. URL https:// arxiv.org/abs/2502.12442. · arXiv
  14. Eugene Mallen, Patrick Lewis, Semih Yavuz, Raymond Ng, Sebastian Riedel, Dhruvesh Sridhar, and Fabio Petroni. Popqa: Open-domain qa with popular questions. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022, 2022.
  15. Reiichiro Nakano, Jacob Hilton, Suchir Balaji, and et al. Webgpt: Browser-assisted question an- swering with human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.09332, 2021. · arXiv
  16. Bo Pan and Liang Zhao. Can past experience accelerate llm reasoning?, 2025. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2505.20643.
  17. Ofir Press, Daniel Khashabi, Ashish Sabharwal, and Tushar Khot. Measuring and narrowing the compositionality gap in language models. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2022.
  18. Cheng Qian, Emre Can Acikgoz, Qi He, Hongru Wang, Xiusi Chen, Dilek Hakkani-Tür, Gokhan Tur, and Heng Ji. Toolrl: Reward is all tool learning needs, 2025. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2504.13958.
  19. Preston Rasmussen, Pavlo Paliychuk, Travis Beauvais, Jack Ryan, and Daniel Chalef. Zep: A temporal knowledge graph architecture for agent memory, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2501.13956. · arXiv
  20. Arjun Singh, Zhe Xiang, Dongheon Kim, Michael Ahn, Jesse Thomason, and Julie Shah. Prog- prompt: Generating situated robot task plans using large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15343, 2023. · arXiv
  21. Huatong Song, Jinhao Jiang, Yingqian Min, Jie Chen, Zhipeng Chen, Wayne Xin Zhao, Lei Fang, and Ji-Rong Wen. R1-searcher: Incentivizing the search capability in llms via reinforcement learning, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05592. · arXiv
  22. Hao Sun, Zile Qiao, Jiayan Guo, Xuanbo Fan, Yingyan Hou, Yong Jiang, Pengjun Xie, Yan Zhang, Fei Huang, and Jingren Zhou. Zerosearch: Incentivize the search capability of llms without searching, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.04588. · arXiv
  23. Harsh Trivedi, Daniel Khashabi, Tushar Khot, Ashish Sabharwal, and Dan Roth. Musique: Multihop questions via single-hop question composition. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2022.
  24. Hongru Wang, Cheng Qian, Wanjun Zhong, Xiusi Chen, Jiahao Qiu, Shijue Huang, Bowen Jin, Mengdi Wang, Kam-Fai Wong, and Heng Ji. Acting less is reasoning more! teaching model to act efficiently, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14870. · arXiv
  25. Liang Wang, Nan Yang, Xiaolong Huang, Binxing Jiao, Linjun Yang, Daxin Jiang, Rangan Ma- jumder, and Furu Wei. Text embeddings by weakly-supervised contrastive pre-training, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.03533. · arXiv
  26. Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc V Le, Denny Zhou, et al. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:24824-24837, 2022.
  27. Zidi Xiong, Yuping Lin, Wenya Xie, Pengfei He, Jiliang Tang, Himabindu Lakkaraju, and Zhen Xi- ang. How memory management impacts llm agents: An empirical study of experience-following behavior, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16067. · arXiv
  28. Wujiang Xu, Kai Mei, Hang Gao, Juntao Tan, Zujie Liang, and Yongfeng Zhang. A-mem: Agentic memory for llm agents, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12110. · arXiv
  29. Zhilin Yang, Peng Qi, Saizheng Zhang, Yoshua Bengio, William W Cohen, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Christopher D Manning. Hotpotqa: A dataset for diverse, explainable multi-hop question answering. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 2369-2380, 2018.
  30. Shinn Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Hyung Won Chung, Jaybos Chen, Karthik Narasimhan, and et al. React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.03629, 2022. · arXiv
  31. Hongli Yu, Tinghong Chen, Jiangtao Feng, Jiangjie Chen, Weinan Dai, Qiying Yu, Ya-Qin Zhang, Wei-Ying Ma, Jingjing Liu, Mingxuan Wang, and Hao Zhou. Memagent: Reshaping long-context llm with multi-conv rl-based memory agent, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2507. 02259.
  32. Chuxu Zhang, Dongjin Song, Chao Huang, Ananthram Swami, and Nitesh V Chawla. Heteroge- neous graph neural network. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining, pp. 793-803, 2019.
  33. Guibin Zhang, Muxin Fu, Guancheng Wan, Miao Yu, Kun Wang, and Shuicheng Yan. G-memory: Tracing hierarchical memory for multi-agent systems, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2506.07398. · arXiv
  34. Shinn Zhang, Eric Wu, Frank Xu, Stuart Russell, and Dragomir Radev. Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11366, 2023. · arXiv
  35. Andrew Zhao, Daniel Huang, Quentin Xu, Matthieu Lin, Yong-Jin Liu, and Gao Huang. Expel: Llm agents are experiential learners, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.10144. · arXiv
  36. Yuxiang Zheng, Dayuan Fu, Xiangkun Hu, Xiaojie Cai, Lyumanshan Ye, Pengrui Lu, and Pengfei Liu. Deepresearcher: Scaling deep research via reinforcement learning in real-world environ- ments, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.03160. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xia, S., Xu, Z., Chai, J., Fan, W., Song, Y., Wang, X., Yin, G., Lin, W., Zhang, H., & Wang, J.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Meituan (China) (CN)
  • Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416189737
Cited by
0
References
1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
LLM agents, graph memory, contextual memory, metacognition, strategic reasoning, catastrophic forgetting, state machines, agent trajectories, interpretability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review