AgentEvolver: Towards Efficient Self-Evolving Agent System
Open accessAbstract
Autonomous agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have the potential to significantly enhance human productivity by reasoning, using tools, and executing complex tasks in diverse environments. However, current approaches to developing such agents remain costly and inefficient, as they typically require manually constructed task datasets and reinforcement learning (RL) pipelines with extensive random exploration. These limitations lead to prohibitively high data-construction costs, low exploration efficiency, and poor sample utilization. To address these challenges, we present AgentEvolver, a self-evolving agent system that leverages the semantic understanding and reasoning capabilities of LLMs to drive autonomous agent learning. AgentEvolver introduces three synergistic mechanisms: (i) self-questioning, which enables curiosity-driven task generation in novel environments, reducing dependence on handcrafted datasets; (ii) self-navigating, which improves exploration efficiency through experience reuse and hybrid policy guidance; and (iii) self-attributing, which enhances sample efficiency by assigning differentiated rewards to trajectory states and actions based on their contribution. By integrating these mechanisms into a unified framework, AgentEvolver enables scalable, cost-effective, and continual improvement of agent capabilities. Preliminary experiments indicate that AgentEvolver achieves more efficient exploration, better sample utilization, and faster adaptation compared to traditional RL-based baselines.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AgentEvolver's self-attributing mechanism uses an LLM's reasoning to retrospectively assign step-wise rewards that are dense and semantically grounded for policy optimization.
“In particular, its self-attributing mechanism uses an LLM's reasoning to retrospectively assign step-wise rewards that are dense and semantically grounded for policy optimization.”
From A Survey of Self-Evolving Agents: What, When, How, and Where to Evolve on the Path to Artificial Super Intelligence (2025) · cites this paper as Zhai et al., 2025
AgentEvolver proposes a comprehensive framework to improve agent training efficiency through three synergistic mechanisms: self-questioning for autonomous task generation, self-navigating for experience-guided exploration, and self-attributing for fine-grained credit assignment.
“AgentEvolver (Zhai et al., 2025) proposes a comprehensive framework to improve agent training efficiency through three synergistic mechanisms: self-questioning for autonomous task generation, self-navigating for experience-guided exploration, and self-attributing for fine-grained credit assignment.”
From A Survey of Self-Evolving Agents: What, When, How, and Where to Evolve on the Path to Artificial Super Intelligence (2025) · cites this paper as Zhai et al., 2025
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards, Amos Storkey, and Oleg Klimov. Exploration by random network distillation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.12894, 2018. · arXiv
- Qikai Chang, Zhenrong Zhang, Pengfei Hu, Jiefeng Ma, Yicheng Pan, Jianshu Zhang, Jun Du, Quan Liu, and Jianqing Gao. THOR: tool-integrated hierarchical optimization via RL for mathematical reasoning. CoRR, abs/2509.13761, 2025. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2509.13761. URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 2509.13761. · DOI
- Hao Chen, Abdul Waheed, Xiang Li, Yidong Wang, Jindong Wang, Bhiksha Raj, and Marah I Abdin. On the diversity of synthetic data and its impact on training large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15226, 2024. · arXiv
- Ganqu Cui, Lifan Yuan, Zefan Wang, Hanbin Wang, Wendi Li, Bingxiang He, Yuchen Fan, Tianyu Yu, Qixin Xu, Weize Chen, Jiarui Yuan, Huayu Chen, Kaiyan Zhang, Xingtai Lv, Shuo Wang, Yuan Yao, Xu Han, Hao Peng, Yu Cheng, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, Bowen Zhou, and Ning Ding. Process reinforcement through implicit rewards. CoRR, abs/2502.01456, 2025a. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2502. 01456. URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.01456. · DOI · Paper page
- Yue Cui, Liuyi Yao, Shuchang Tao, Weijie Shi, Yaliang Li, Bolin Ding, and Xiaofang Zhou. Enhancing tool learning in large language models with hierarchical error checklists. In Wanxiang Che, Joyce Nabende, Ekaterina Shutova, and Mohammad Taher Pilehvar (eds.), Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2025, Vienna, Austria, July 27 -August 1, 2025, pp. 16357-16375. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2025b. URL https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-acl.841/.
- Hanxing Ding, Shuchang Tao, Liang Pang, Zihao Wei, Jinyang Gao, Bolin Ding, Huawei Shen, and Xueqi Cheng. Toolcoder: A systematic code-empowered tool learning framework for large language models. In Wanxiang Che, Joyce Nabende, Ekaterina Shutova, and Mohammad Taher Pilehvar (eds.), Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), ACL 2025, Vienna, Austria, July 27 -August 1, 2025, pp. 17876-17891. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2025. URL https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.874/.
- Yu Du, Fangyun Wei, and Hongyang Zhang. Anytool: Self-reflective, hierarchical agents for large-scale API calls. In Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2024, Vienna, Austria, July 21-27, 2024. OpenReview.net, 2024. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=qFILbkTQWw.
- Lang Feng, Zhenghai Xue, Tingcong Liu, and Bo An. Group-in-group policy optimization for llm agent training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.10978, 2025. · arXiv
- Daya Guo, Dejian Yang, Haowei Zhang, Junxiao Song, Peiyi Wang, Qihao Zhu, Runxin Xu, Ruoyu Zhang, Shirong Ma, Xiao Bi, et al. Deepseek-r1 incentivizes reasoning in llms through reinforcement learning. Nature, 645(8081):633-638, 2025.
- Danijar Hafner. Benchmarking the spectrum of agent capabilities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.06780, 2021. · arXiv
- Bowen Jin, Hansi Zeng, Zhenrui Yue, Jinsung Yoon, Sercan O. Arik, Dong Wang, Hamed Zamani, and Jiawei Han. Search-r1: Training llms to reason and leverage search engines with reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.09516, 2025. · arXiv
- Feiyang Kang, Newsha Ardalani, Michael Kuchnik, Youssef Emad, Mostafa Elhoushi, Shubhabrata Sengupta, Shang-Wen Li, Ramya Raghavendra, Ruoxi Jia, and Carole-Jean Wu. Demystifying synthetic data in llm pre-training: A systematic study of scaling laws, benefits, and pitfalls. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.01631, 2025. · arXiv
- Xuefeng Li, Haoyang Zou, and Pengfei Liu. Torl: Scaling tool-integrated RL. CoRR, abs/2503.23383, 2025. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2503.23383. URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.23383. · DOI
- Aixin Liu, Bei Feng, Bing Xue, Bingxuan Wang, Bochao Wu, Chengda Lu, Chenggang Zhao, Chengqi Deng, Chenyu Zhang, Chong Ruan, et al. Deepseek-v3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19437, 2024. · arXiv
- Minghuan Liu, Menghui Zhu, and Weinan Zhang. Goal-conditioned reinforcement learning: Problems and solutions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.08299, 2022. · arXiv
- Cong Lu, Shengran Hu, and Jeff Clune. Intelligent go-explore: Standing on the shoulders of giant foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.15143, 2024. · arXiv
- Shishir G. Patil, Tianjun Zhang, Xin Wang, and Joseph E. Gonzalez. The berkeley function calling leaderboard (bfcl): From tool use to agentic evaluation of large language models. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2025. URL https://gorilla.cs.berkeley. edu/leaderboard.html.
- Shuofei Qiao, Runnan Fang, Ningyu Zhang, Yuqi Zhu, Xiang Chen, Shumin Deng, Yong Jiang, Pengjun Xie, Fei Huang, and Huajun Chen. Agent planning with world knowledge model. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:114843-114871, 2024.
- Changle Qu, Sunhao Dai, Xiaochi Wei, Hengyi Cai, Shuaiqiang Wang, Dawei Yin, Jun Xu, and Ji-Rong Wen. Tool learning with large language models: a survey. Frontiers Comput. Sci., 19(8):198343, 2025. doi: 10.1007/S11704-024-40678-2. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-024-40678-2. · DOI
- Tom Schaul, Daniel Horgan, Karol Gregor, and David Silver. Universal value function approximators. In International conference on machine learning, pp. 1312-1320. PMLR, 2015.
- Guangming Sheng, Chi Zhang, Zilingfeng Ye, Xibin Wu, Wang Zhang, Ru Zhang, Yanghua Peng, Haibin Lin, and Chuan Wu. Hybridflow: A flexible and efficient rlhf framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.19256, 2024. · arXiv
- Yuda Song, Julia Kempe, and Remi Munos. Outcome-based exploration for llm reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.06941, 2025. · arXiv
- Shuo Tang, Xianghe Pang, Zexi Liu, Bohan Tang, Rui Ye, Tian Jin, Xiaowen Dong, Yanfeng Wang, and Siheng Chen. Synthesizing post-training data for LLMs through multi-agent simulation. In Wanxiang Che, Joyce Nabende, Ekaterina Shutova, and Mohammad Taher Pilehvar (eds.), Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 23306-23335, Vienna, Austria, July 2025. Association for Computational Linguistics. ISBN 979-8-89176-251-0. doi: 10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1136. URL https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.1136/. · DOI
- Qwen Team. Qwen3 technical report, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09388. · arXiv
- Qwen Team et al. Qwen2 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.10671, 2:3, 2024. · arXiv
- Harsh Trivedi, Tushar Khot, Mareike Hartmann, Ruskin Manku, Vinty Dong, Edward Li, Shashank Gupta, Ashish Sabharwal, and Niranjan Balasubramanian. Appworld: A controllable world of apps and people for benchmarking interactive coding agents. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 16022-16076. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2024. doi: 10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.850. · DOI · Paper page
- Pablo Villalobos, Anson Ho, Jaime Sevilla, Tamay Besiroglu, Lennart Heim, and Marius Hobbhahn. Position: Will we run out of data? limits of llm scaling based on human-generated data. In Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024.
- Xinyue Wang and Biwei Huang. Modeling unseen environments with language-guided composable causal components in reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.08361, 2025. · arXiv
- Jianhao Yan, Yafu Li, Zican Hu, Zhi Wang, Ganqu Cui, Xiaoye Qu, Yu Cheng, and Yue Zhang. Learning to reason under off-policy guidance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.14945, 2025. · arXiv
- Shunyu Yao, Howard Chen, John Yang, and Karthik Narasimhan. Webshop: Towards scalable real-world web interaction with grounded language agents. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35: 20744-20757, 2022.
- Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik R. Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2023, Kigali, Rwanda, May 1-5, 2023. OpenReview.net, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=WE vluYUL-X.
- Guibin Zhang, Hejia Geng, Xiaohang Yu, Zhenfei Yin, Zaibin Zhang, Zelin Tan, Heng Zhou, Zhongzhi Li, Xiangyuan Xue, Yijiang Li, Yifan Zhou, Yang Chen, Chen Zhang, Yutao Fan, Zihu Wang, Songtao Huang, Yue Liao, Hongru Wang, Mengyue Yang, Heng Ji, Michael Littman, Jun Wang, Shuicheng Yan, Philip Torr, and Lei Bai. The landscape of agentic reinforcement learning for llms: A survey. CoRR, abs/2509.02547, 2025a. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2509.02547. URL https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2509.02547. · DOI
- Yabo Zhang, Yihan Zeng, Qingyun Li, Zhen Hu, Kavin Han, and Wangmeng Zuo. Tool-r1: Sample- efficient reinforcement learning for agentic tool use. CoRR, abs/2509.12867, 2025b. doi: 10.48550/ ARXIV.2509.12867. URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.12867. · DOI
- Authors
- Zhai, Y., Tao, S., Chen, C., Zou, A., Chen, Z., Fu, Q., Mai, S., Yu, L., Deng, J., Cao, Z., Liu, Z., Ding, B., & Zhou, J.
- Affiliations
- Alibaba Group (Cayman Islands) (KY)
- ORCID
- Zhai, Yunpeng
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2511.10395
- OpenAlex
- W4416239856
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- self-evolving agents, large language models, autonomous agents, self-questioning, exploration efficiency, experience reuse, sample efficiency, continual learning, reinforcement learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review