The DOI matches its DataCite record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
UFO3: Weaving the Digital Agent Galaxy
Abstract
Large language model (LLM)-powered agents are transforming digital devices from passive tools into proactive intelligent collaborators. However, most existing frameworks remain confined to a single OS or device, making cross-device workflows brittle and largely manual. We present UFO$^3$, a system that unifies heterogeneous endpoints, desktops, servers, mobile devices, and edge, into a single orchestration fabric. UFO$^3$ models each user request as a mutable TaskConstellation: a distributed DAG of atomic subtasks (TaskStars) with explicit control and data dependencies (TaskStarLines). The TaskConstellation continuously evolves as results stream in from distributed devices, enabling asynchronous execution, adaptive recovery, and dynamic optimization. A Constellation Orchestrator} executes tasks safely and asynchronously while applying dynamic DAG updates, and the Agent Interaction Protocol (AIP) provides persistent, low-latency channels for reliable task dispatch and result streaming. These designs dissolve the traditional boundaries between devices and platforms, allowing agents to collaborate seamlessly and amplify their collective intelligence. We evaluate UFO$^3$ on NebulaBench, a benchmark of 55 cross-device tasks across 5 machines and 10 categories. UFO$^3$ achieves 83.3% subtask completion, 70.9% task success, exposes parallelism with an average width of 1.72, and reduces end-to-end latency by 31% relative to a sequential baseline. Fault-injection experiments demonstrate graceful degradation and recovery under transient and permanent agent failures. These results show that UFO$^3$ achieves accurate, efficient, and resilient task orchestration across heterogeneous devices, uniting isolated agents into a coherent, adaptive computing fabric that extends across the landscape of ubiquitous computing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges
Guo, T., Chen, X., Wang, Y., Chang, R., Pei, S., Chawla, N. V., Wiest, O., & Zhang, X. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.01680 · Cited by 1,713
A Survey on In-context Learning
Dong, Q., Li, L., Dai, D., Zheng, C., Ma, J., Li, R., Xia, H., Xu, J., Wu, Z., Liu, T., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.00234 · Cited by 248
Self-citationEhtesham, A., Singh, A., Gupta, G. K., & Kumar, S. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.02279 · Cited by 10
Multi-Agent Collaboration via Evolving Orchestration
Dang, Y., Qian, C., Luo, X., Fan, J., Xie, Z., Shi, R., Chen, W., Yang, C., Che, X., Tian, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.19591 · Cited by 8
When Should We Orchestrate Multiple Agents?
Bhatt, U., Kapoor, S., Upadhyay, M., Sucholutsky, I., Quinzan, F., Collins, K. M., Weller, A., Wilson, A. G., & Zafar, M. B. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.13577
Graphs Meet AI Agents: Taxonomy, Progress, and Future Opportunities
Bei, Y., Zhang, W., Wang, S., Chen, W., Zhou, S., Chen, H., Li, Y., Bu, J., Pan, S., Yu, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.18019
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, C., Li, L., Huang, H., Ni, C., Qiao, B., Qin, S., Kang, Y., Ma, M., Lin, Q., Rajmohan, S., & Zhang, D.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- arXiv
- 2511.11332
- References
- 6
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: UFO3: Weaving the Digital Agent Galaxy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2511.11332
- The paper
- Zhang, C., Li, L., Huang, H., Ni, C., Qiao, B., Qin, S., Kang, Y., Ma, M., Lin, Q., Rajmohan, S., & Zhang, D. (2025). UFO3: Weaving the Digital Agent Galaxy. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2511.11332
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.