PreprintCited by 2Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningArtificial Intelligence Applications

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nex-N1: Agentic Models Trained via a Unified Ecosystem for Large-Scale Environment Construction

Open access
AGI Team, Cai, Yuxuan, Chen, Lu, Chen, Qiaoling, Ding, Yuyang, Fan, Liwen, Fu, Wenjie, Gao, Yufei, Guo, Honglin, Guo, Pinxue, Han, Zhenhua, He, Zhengfu, Hu, Hanglei, Hu, Kai, Hua, Shengjia, Huai, Tianyu, Huang, Baodai, Ji, Li, Jiang, Zhen, Lei, Zhikai, Li, Bufan, Lin, Jiahang, Lin, Lizhi, Liu, Jinxiu, Liu, Shichun, Liu, Ziming, Ni, Yuchen, Qian, Pengfang, Shen, Yujiong, Shi, Qingyun, Shu, Wentao, Sun, Peng, Suo, Yiran, Tang, Tian, Tian, Boyu, Wang, Guoteng, Wang, Junzhe, Wang, Peixin, Xi, Zhiheng, Yan, Hang, Yang, Jie, Yang, Zhixiong, Yao, Tianchu, Ye, Guangze, Yu, Qianxi, Zhang, Shuo, Zhang, Xinyue, Zhang, Yiqi, Zhao, Jiarong, Zheng, Miao, Zheng, Rui, Zhou, Enyu, Zhou, Jiazheng, Zhou, Maosen, Zhou, Yuhao, Gui, Tao, Zheng, Yining, Chen, Xinchi, Zhou, Jie, Feng, Siyuan, Chen, Qin, He, Liang, Zhang, Qi, Huang, Xuanjing, Qiu, Xipeng·2025·arXiv

Abstract

The evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) from passive responders to autonomous agents necessitates a fundamental shift in learning paradigms -- from static imitation to incentive-driven decision making. However, this transition is significantly impeded by the lack of scalable infrastructure capable of constructing high-quality interaction signals for effective policy learning. To address this, we introduce a comprehensive method designed to systematically scale the diversity and complexity of interactive environments. Our method realizes this scaling by addressing three orthogonal dimensions: (1) Complexity: NexAU, a flexible agent framework that supports building complex agent hierarchies via simple configurations; (2) Diversity: NexA4A automatically generates diverse agent hierarchies from natural language to cover infinite domains; and (3) Fidelity: NexGAP bridges the simulation-reality gap by integrating dynamic real-world environment for grounded trajectories synthesis. We train Nex-N1 upon the diverse and complex interactive environments established by our infrastructure. Empirical results on benchmarks such as SWE-bench and tau2 demonstrate that Nex-N1 consistently outperforms SOTA open-source models and achieves competitive performance against frontier proprietary models on complex agentic tasks. We open-source the Nex ecosystem and model weights to facilitate further research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2512.04987

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The NexAU framework exposes seven orthogonal component types as explicit files at fixed mount points in a single workspace: system prompt, tool description, tool implementation, middleware, skill, sub-agent configuration, and long-term memory.

    “We instantiate the harness H on the NexAU framework [23, 37], which exposes seven orthogonal component types as explicit files at fixed mount points in a single workspace: system prompt, tool description, tool implementation, middleware, skill, sub-agent configuration, and long-term memory.”

    From Agentic Harness Engineering: Observability-Driven Automatic Evolution of Coding-Agent Harnesses (2026) · cites this paper as [37]

    Section 2.1 identifies NexAU as a modular agent runtime with tools and sub-agents, while the 'Unified interface for diverse capabilities' section describes skills and shared storage. Neither section describes seven orthogonal component types exposed as files at fixed mount points in one workspace; the paper also does not establish middleware or separate tool-description and tool-implementation files as members of that list. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Pierre Andrews, Amine Benhalloum, Gerard Moreno-Torres Bertran, Matteo Bettini, Amar Budhiraja, Ricardo Silveira Cabral, et al. Are: Scaling up agent environments and evalua- tions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.17158, 2025. Introduces the GAIA 2 Benchmark. Anthropic. Introducing agent skills, 2025. URL https://www.claude.com/blog/skills. Accessed: 2025-12-04. · arXiv
  2. Victor Barres, Honghua Dong, Soham Ray, Xujie Si, and Karthik Narasimhan. τ 2 - bench: Evaluating conversational agents in a dual-control environment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.07982, 2025. · arXiv
  3. Yoshua Bengio, Yann Lecun, and Geoffrey Hinton. Deep learning for ai. Communications of the ACM, 64(7):58-65, 2021.
  4. Sébastien Bubeck, Varun Chandrasekaran, Ronen Eldan, Johannes Gehrke, Eric Horvitz, Ece Kamar, Peter Lee, Yin Tat Lee, Yuanzhi Li, Scott Lundberg, et al. Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12712, 2023. · arXiv
  5. Mingxuan Du, Benfeng Xu, Chiwei Zhu, Xiaorui Wang, and Zhendong Mao. Deepre- search bench: A comprehensive benchmark for deep research agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.11763, 2025. · arXiv
  6. Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao, Kexin Pei, Ofir Press, and Karthik Narasimhan. SWE-bench: Can language models resolve real-world gitHub issues? In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2024.
  7. Aiyuan Liu, Bei Feng, Bin Wang, Bingxuan Wang, Bo Liu, et al. Deepseek-v2: A strong, eco- nomical, and efficient mixture-of-experts language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.04434, 2024. · arXiv
  8. Xiao Liu et al. Agentbench: Evaluating llms as agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03688, 2023. · arXiv
  9. Junbo Niu, Zheng Liu, Zhuangcheng Gu, Bin Wang, Linke Ouyang, Zhiyuan Zhao, Tao Chu, Tianyao He, Fan Wu, Qintong Zhang, et al. Mineru2. 5: A decoupled vision-language model for efficient high-resolution document parsing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.22186, 2025. · arXiv
  10. OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023. · arXiv
  11. Shishir G. Patil, Tianjun Zhang, Xin Wang, and Joseph E. Gonzalez. Gorilla: Large language model connected with massive apis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15334, 2023a. Benchmark updated to V4 in 2025. · arXiv
  12. Shishir G Patil et al. Gorilla: Large language model connected with massive apis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15334, 2023b. · arXiv
  13. Noah Shinn et al. Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11366, 2023. · arXiv
  14. Karthik Valmeekam et al. On the planning abilities of large language models: A critical investigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15771, 2023. · arXiv
  15. Mark Vero, Niels Mündler, Victor Chibotaru, Veselin Raychev, Maximilian Baader, Nikola Jovanović, Jingxuan He, and Martin Vechev. Baxbench: Can llms generate correct and secure backends? arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11844, 2025. · arXiv
  16. Guanzhi Wang, Yuqi Xie, Yunfan Jiang, Ajay Mandlekar, Chaowei Xiao, Yuke Zhu, Linxi Fan, and Anima Anandkumar. Voyager: An open-ended embodied agent with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16291, 2023. · arXiv
  17. Zhiheng Xi, Xin Guo, Yang Nan, Enyu Zhou, Junrui Shen, Wenxiang Chen, Jiaqi Liu, Jixuan Huang, Zhihao Zhang, Honglin Guo, et al. Bapo: Stabilizing off-policy reinforcement learning for llms via balanced policy optimization with adaptive clipping. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.18927, 2025. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
AGI Team, Cai, Y., Chen, L., Chen, Q., Ding, Y., Fan, L., Fu, W., Gao, Y., Guo, H., Guo, P., Han, Z., He, Z., Hu, H., Hu, K., Hua, S., Huai, T., Huang, B., Ji, L., Jiang, Z., Lei, Z., Li, B., Lin, J., Lin, L., Liu, J., Liu, S., Liu, Z., Ni, Y., Qian, P., Shen, Y., Shi, Q., Shu, W., Sun, P., Suo, Y., Tang, T., Tian, B., Wang, G., Wang, J., Wang, P., Xi, Z., Yan, H., Yang, J., Yang, Z., Yao, T., Ye, G., Yu, Q., Zhang, S., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Zhao, J., Zheng, M., Zheng, R., Zhou, E., Zhou, J., Zhou, M., Zhou, Y., Gui, T., Zheng, Y., Chen, X., Zhou, J., Feng, S., Chen, Q., He, L., Zhang, Q., Huang, X., & Qiu, X.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4417087192
Cited by
0
References
4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
large language models, autonomous agents, agent hierarchy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review