CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 2Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMachine Learning in HealthcareElectronic Health Records Systems

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

MCP-AI: Protocol-Driven Intelligence Framework for Autonomous Reasoning in Healthcare

Open access
ElSayed, Zag, Erickson, Craig, Pedapati, Ernest·2025·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2512.05365arXiv 2512.05365
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Healthcare AI systems have historically faced challenges in merging contextual reasoning, long-term state management, and human-verifiable workflows into a cohesive framework. This paper introduces a completely innovative architecture and concept: combining the Model Context Protocol (MCP) with a specific clinical application, known as MCP-AI. This integration allows intelligent agents to reason over extended periods, collaborate securely, and adhere to authentic clinical logic, representing a significant shift away from traditional Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) and prompt-based Large Language Models (LLMs). As healthcare systems become more complex, the need for autonomous, context-aware clinical reasoning frameworks has become urgent. We present MCP-AI, a novel architecture for explainable medical decision-making built upon the Model Context Protocol (MCP) a modular, executable specification for orchestrating generative and descriptive AI agents in real-time workflows. Each MCP file captures clinical objectives, patient context, reasoning state, and task logic, forming a reusable and auditable memory object. Unlike conventional CDSS or stateless prompt-based AI systems, MCP-AI supports adaptive, longitudinal, and collaborative reasoning across care settings. MCP-AI is validated through two use cases: (1) diagnostic modeling of Fragile X Syndrome with comorbid depression, and (2) remote coordination for Type 2 Diabetes and hypertension. In either scenario, the protocol facilitates physician-in-the-loop validation, streamlines clinical processes, and guarantees secure transitions of AI responsibilities between healthcare providers. The system connects with HL7/FHIR interfaces and adheres to regulatory standards, such as HIPAA and FDA SaMD guidelines. MCP-AI provides a scalable basis for interpretable, composable, and safety-oriented AI within upcoming clinical environments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2512.05365

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. [1][1] T. Dave, S. A. Athaluri, and S. Singh, "Chatgpt in medicine: an overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations," Frontiers in artificial intelligence, vol. 6, p. 1169595, 2023.
  2. [2][2] C. E. Haupt and M. Marks, "Ai-generated medical advice—gpt and beyond," Jama, vol. 329, no. 16, pp. 1349–1350, 2023.
  3. [4][4] R. J. Hagerman and P. J. Hagerman, "Fragile x-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (fxtas)," Pediatrics, vol. 139, no. 3, 2017.
  4. [5][5] K. Singhal, S. Azizi, T. Tu, S. S. Mahdavi, J. Wei, H. W. Chung, N. Scales, A. Tanwani, H. Cole-Lewis, S. Pfohl, et al., "Large language models encode clinical knowledge," Nature, vol. 620, no. 7972, pp. 172– 180, 2023.
  5. [6][6] V. Harish, F. Morgado, A. D. Stern, and S. Das, "Artificial intelligence and clinical decision making: the new nature of medical uncertainty," Academic Medicine, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 31–36, 2021.
  6. [7][7] A. McKeever, M. Agius, and P. Mohr, "A review of the epidemiology of major depressive disorder and of its consequences for society and the individual," Psychiatria Danubina, vol. 29, no. suppl. 3, pp. 222–231, 2017.
  7. [8][8] X. Hou, Y. Zhao, S. Wang, and H. Wang, "Model context protocol (mcp): Landscape, security threats, and future research directions," arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.23278, 2025. · arXiv
  8. [9][9] R. T. Sutton, D. Pincock, D. C. Baumgart, D. C. Sadowski, R. N. Fedorak, and K. I. Kroeker, "An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success," NPJ digital medicine, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 17, 2020.
  9. [10][10] M. A. Musen, B. Middleton, and R. A. Greenes, "Clinical decision- support systems," in Biomedical informatics: computer applications in health care and biomedicine, pp. 795–840, Springer, 2021.
  10. [11][11] E. S. Berner, Clinical decision support systems, vol. 233. Springer, 2007.
  11. [12][12] A. Belle, M. A. Kon, and K. Najarian, "Biomedical informatics for computer-aided decision support systems: A survey," The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2013, no. 1, p. 769639, 2013.
  12. [13][13] F. Wang and A. Preininger, "Ai in health: state of the art, challenges, and future directions," Yearbook of medical informatics, vol. 28, no. 01, pp. 016–026, 2019.
  13. [14][14] J. Y. Halpern, Reasoning about uncertainty. MIT press, 2017.
  14. [15][15] S. R. Alli, S. Q. Hossain, S. Das, and R. Upshur, "The potential of artificial intelligence tools for reducing uncertainty in medicine and directions for medical education," JMIR Medical Education, vol. 10, no. 1, p. e51446, 2024.
  15. [16][16] J. A. Sidey-Gibbons and C. J. Sidey-Gibbons, "Machine learning in medicine: a practical introduction," BMC medical research methodology, vol. 19, pp. 1–18, 2019.
  16. [17][17] R. J. Hagerman and P. J. Hagerman, Fragile X syndrome: Diagnosis, treatment, and research. Taylor & Francis US, 2002.
  17. [18][18] I. D. Raji and R. Dobbe, "Concrete problems in ai safety, revisited," arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.10899, 2023. · arXiv
  18. [21][21] W. Ochoa, F. Larrinaga, and A. Pérez, "Context-aware workflow man- agement for smart manufacturing: A literature review of semantic web- based approaches," Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 145, pp. 38–55, 2023.
  19. [22][22] C. M. DesRoches, S. Leveille, S. K. Bell, Z. J. Dong, J. G. Elmore, L. Fernandez, K. Harcourt, P. Fitzgerald, T. H. Payne, R. Stametz, et al., "The views and experiences of clinicians sharing medical record notes with patients," JAMA Network Open, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. e201753– e201753, 2020.
  20. [23][23] R. S. Hooker, V. Kulo, G. Kayingo, H.-J. Jun, and J. F. Cawley, "Workforce: Forecasting the physician assistant/associate workforce: 2020–2035," Future Healthcare Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 57–63, 2022.
  21. [24][24] W. M. Oslock, B. Satiani, D. P. Way, R. M. Tamer, J. Maurer, J. D. Hawley, K. L. Sharp, T. E. Williams, T. M. Pawlik, E. C. Ellison, et al., "A contemporary reassessment of the us surgical workforce through 2050 predicts continued shortages and increased productivity demands," The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 223, no. 1, pp. 28–35, 2022.
  22. [25][25] D. D. Protic, R. Aishworiya, M. J. Salcedo-Arellano, S. J. Tang, J. Milisavljevic, F. Mitrovic, R. J. Hagerman, and D. B. Budimirovic, "Fragile x syndrome: from molecular aspect to clinical treatment," International journal of molecular sciences, vol. 23, no. 4, p. 1935, 2022.
  23. [26][26] G. Thornicroft, S. Chatterji, S. Evans-Lacko, M. Gruber, N. Sampson, S. Aguilar-Gaxiola, A. Al-Hamzawi, J. Alonso, L. Andrade, G. Borges, et al., "Undertreatment of people with major depressive disorder in 21 countries," The British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 210, no. 2, pp. 119– 124, 2017.
  24. [27][27] D. Thilina and R. Yadurshini, "The economic burden of depression: Why we should invest in treatment and prevention," IJCMCR. 2020; 4 (5): 001 DOI: 10.46998/IJCMCR, vol. 96, 2020. · DOI
  25. [28][28] Y. Zhang, X. Jia, Y. Yang, N. Sun, S. Shi, and W. Wang, "Change in the global burden of depression from 1990-2019 and its prediction for 2030," Journal of psychiatric research, vol. 178, pp. 16–22, 2024.
  26. [30][30] V. M. Rao, M. Hla, M. Moor, S. Adithan, S. Kwak, E. J. Topol, and P. Rajpurkar, "Multimodal generative ai for medical image interpreta- tion," Nature, vol. 639, no. 8056, pp. 888–896, 2025.
  27. [31][31] R. Sreejith and S. Senthil, "Smart contract authentication assisted graphmap-based hl7 fhir architecture for interoperable e-healthcare system," Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 4, 2023.
  28. [32][32] T. Bouchez, C. Cagnon, G. Hamouche, M. Majdoub, J. Charlet, and M. Schuers, "Interprofessional clinical decision-making process in health: A scoping review," Journal of advanced nursing, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 884–907, 2024.
  29. [33][33] M. Griot, J. Vanderdonckt, D. Yuksel, and C. Hemptinne, "Physician in the loop design of interactive agents," in Engineering Interactive Computer Systems. EICS 2024 International Workshops (L. Zaina, J. C. Campos, D. Spano, K. Luyten, P. Palanque, G. van der Veer, A. Ebert, S. R. Humayoun, and V. Memmesheimer, eds.), (Cham), pp. 94–109, Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025.
  30. [34][34] S. M. Gold, O. Köhler-Forsberg, R. Moss-Morris, A. Mehnert, J. J. Miranda, M. Bullinger, A. Steptoe, M. A. Whooley, and C. Otte, "Comorbid depression in medical diseases," Nature reviews Disease primers, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 69, 2020.
  31. [35][35] G. Z. Tau and B. S. Peterson, "Normal development of brain circuits," Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 147–168, 2010.
  32. [36][36] J. Smith-Nielsen, S. Matthey, T. Lange, and M. S. Væver, "Validation of the edinburgh postnatal depression scale against both dsm-5 and icd- 10 diagnostic criteria for depression," BMC psychiatry, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 393, 2018.
  33. [37][37] V. Vallon, "The mechanisms and therapeutic potential of sglt2 inhibitors in diabetes mellitus," Annual review of medicine, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 255– 270, 2015.
  34. [38][38] G. Graffigna, S. Barello, A. Bonanomi, and E. Lozza, "Measuring patient engagement: development and psychometric properties of the patient health engagement (phe) scale," Frontiers in psychology, vol. 6, p. 274, 2015.
  35. [39][39] M. R. Tranfaglia, "The psychiatric presentation of fragile x: evolution of the diagnosis and treatment of the psychiatric comorbidities of fragile x syndrome," Developmental neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 337–348, 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
ElSayed, Z., Erickson, C., & Pedapati, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
Pages
1446-1451
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2512.05365
arXiv
2512.05365
OpenAlex
W4417142392
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
2.08
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
Model Context Protocol, clinical decision support, comorbid depression, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, HIPAA compliance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review