The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EverMemOS: A Self-Organizing Memory Operating System for Structured Long-Horizon Reasoning
Open accessAbstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as long-term interactive agents, yet their limited context windows make it difficult to sustain coherent behavior over extended interactions. Existing memory systems often store isolated records and retrieve fragments, limiting their ability to consolidate evolving user states and resolve conflicts. We introduce EverMemOS, a self-organizing memory operating system that implements an engram-inspired lifecycle for computational memory. Episodic Trace Formation converts dialogue streams into MemCells that capture episodic traces, atomic facts, and time-bounded Foresight signals. Semantic Consolidation organizes MemCells into thematic MemScenes, distilling stable semantic structures and updating user profiles. Reconstructive Recollection performs MemScene-guided agentic retrieval to compose the necessary and sufficient context for downstream reasoning. Experiments on LoCoMo and LongMemEval show that EverMemOS achieves state-of-the-art performance on memory-augmented reasoning tasks. We further report a profile study on PersonaMem v2 and qualitative case studies illustrating chat-oriented capabilities such as user profiling and Foresight. Code is available at https://github.com/EverMind-AI/EverMemOS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Consolidation-based systems overwrite or re-cluster at component grain, not along dependencies.
“Consolidation-based systems [15, 39] overwrite or re-cluster at component grain, not along dependencies.”
From Is Agent Memory a Database? Rethinking Data Foundations for Long-Term AI Agent Memory (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
Section 3.4 (p. 4) describes EverMemOS consolidating individual MemCells into MemScenes by similarity and updating scene summaries and user profiles. This supports clustering and updating at the level of memory components, but the paper does not establish that consolidation-based systems generally overwrite or re-cluster rather than operate along dependencies. (LLM, conf=0.79)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredEverMemOS expires time-bounded foresight at retrieval while keeping the rest.
“It expires time-bounded foresight at retrieval while keeping the rest.”
From Is Agent Memory a Database? Rethinking Data Foundations for Long-Term AI Agent Memory (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
Agent memory systems evict by FIFO, lifecycle stage, or store size, or delete locally, without relevance.
“Agent memory systems evict by FIFO, lifecycle stage, or store size [15, 20, 29], or delete locally [7], without relevance.”
From Is Agent Memory a Database? Rethinking Data Foundations for Long-Term AI Agent Memory (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
The citation [7] is attached to “delete locally,” but our copy does not describe EverMemOS deleting stored memories locally or specify whether such deletion uses relevance. Section 3.5 (p. 5) describes relevance-based retrieval and filtering expired foresight, which does not establish the claimed deletion behavior. Searches for deletion, eviction, and local removal found no decisive passage. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredTier-based, lifecycle-based, capacity-based, and learned-controller eviction all key on age or size.
“Tier-based, lifecyclebased, capacity-based, and learned-controller eviction all key on age or size [7, 15, 20, 29, 40, 44].”
From Is Agent Memory a Database? Rethinking Data Foundations for Long-Term AI Agent Memory (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
The Memory Systems section (p. 3) describes some systems as focusing on lifecycle and capacity, but does not say their eviction decisions key on age or size. Searches for eviction, age, size, and retention found no passage addressing that assertion across the four named approaches. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What Deserves Memory: Adaptive Memory Distillation for LLM Agents
Ma, W., Nan, J., & Wu, W. (2026) · Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.1607 · Cited by 89 · cited 1×
“Some focus on lifecycle and capacity, such as Nemori ’s (Nan et al., 2025) prediction-driven updates and MemoryOS ’s (Kang et al., 2025) hierarchical control.”
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- Iz Beltagy, Matthew E Peters, and Arman Cohan. 2020. Longformer: The long-document transformer. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics . Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Atilim Gunes Bulatov, Valentin Khrulkov, Leyla Mirvakhabova, Alexey Markov, Artem Babenko, and Ivan Oseledets. 2022. Recurrent memory transformer. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 20230-20243.
- Aydar Bulatov, Yuri Kuratov, and Mikhail S. Burtsev. 2023. Scaling transformer to 1m tokens and beyond with rmt. ArXiv , abs/2304.11062. · arXiv
- Guanzheng Chen, Xin Li, Zaiqiao Meng, Shangsong Liang, and Lidong Wang. 2024. Clex: Continuous length extrapolation for large language models. In International Conference on Learning Representations .
- Guanzheng Chen, Xin Li, Michael Qizhe Shieh, and Lidong Bing. 2025. LongPO: Long context selfevolution of large language models through shortto-long preference optimization. In The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations .
- Prateek Chhikara, Dev Khant, Saket Aryan, Taranjeet Singh, and Deshraj Yadav. 2025. Mem0: Building production-ready ai agents with scalable long-term memory. Preprint , arXiv:2504.19413. · arXiv
- Zihang Dai, Zhilin Yang, Yiming Yang, Jaime Carbonell, Quoc V Le, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2019. Transformer-XL: Attentive language models beyond a fixed-length context. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pages 2978-2988. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Matthias De Lange, Rahaf Aljundi, Marc Masana, Sarah Parisot, Xu Jia, Aleš Leonardis, Greg Slabaugh, and Tinne Tuytelaars. 2022. A continual learning survey: Defying forgetting in classification tasks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 44(7):3366-3385.
- Mohamed Amine Ferrag, Norbert Tihanyi, and Merouane Debbah. 2025. From llm reasoning to autonomous ai agents: A comprehensive review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19678 . · arXiv
- Yue Gong and 1 others. 2024. M+: An efficient memory structure for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.09337 . · arXiv
- Alex Graves, Greg Wayne, and Ivo Danihelka. 2014. Neural turing machines. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.5401 . · arXiv
- Alex Graves, Greg Wayne, Malcolm Reynolds, Tim Harley, Ivo Keck, William O'Brien, Alistair Kritzman, Stanislav Illarionov, Edward Grefenstette, Tiago Wuthrich, and 1 others. 2016. Hybrid computing using a neural network with dynamic external memory. Nature , 538(7626):471-476.
- Bowen Jiang, Yuan Yuan, Maohao Shen, Zhuoqun Hao, Zhangchen Xu, Zichen Chen, Ziyi Liu, Anvesh Rao Vijjini, Jiashu He, Hanchao Yu, Radha Poovendran, Gregory Wornell, Lyle Ungar, Dan Roth, Sihao Chen, and Camillo Jose Taylor. 2025. Personamem-v2: Towards personalized intelligence via learning implicit user personas and agentic memory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.06688 . · arXiv
- Sheena A Josselyn, Stefan Köhler, and Paul W Frankland. 2015. Finding the engram. Nature Reviews Neuroscience , 16(9):521-534.
- Jiazheng Kang, Mingming Ji, Zhe Zhao, and Ting Bai. 2025. Memory os of ai agent. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.06326 . · arXiv
- Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Yuxiang Kukliansky, Wen-tau Yih Chen, Tim Rocktäschel, Sebastian Riedel, and Douwe Kiela. 2020. Retrievalaugmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume 33, pages 9459-9474.
- Zhiyu Li, Shichao Song, Chenyang Xi, Hanyu Wang, Chen Tang, Simin Niu, Ding Chen, Jiawei Yang, Chunyu Li, Qingchen Yu, and 1 others. 2025. Memos: A memory os for ai system. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.03724 . · arXiv
- Nelson F Liu, Kevin Lin, John Hewitt, Ashwin Paranjape, Michele Bevilacqua, Fabio Petroni, and Percy Liang. 2024. Lost in the middle: How language models use long contexts. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 12:157-173.
- Adyasha Maharana, Dong-Ho Lee, Sergey Tulyakov, Mohit Bansal, Francesco Barbieri, and Yuwei Fang. 2024. Evaluating very long-term conversational memory of llm agents. Preprint , arXiv:2402.17753. · arXiv
- James L McGaugh. 2000. Memory-a century of consolidation. Science , 287(5451):248-251.
- Alexander Miller, Adam Fisch, Jesse Dodge, AmirHossein Karimi, Antoine Bordes, and Jason Weston. 2016. Key-value memory networks for directly reading documents. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 1400-1409. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Jiayan Nan, Wenquan Ma, Wenlong Wu, and Yize Chen. 2025. Nemori: Self-organizing agent memory inspired by cognitive science. Preprint , arXiv:2508.03341. · arXiv
- Charles Packer, Vivian Woodside, Neal Dhir, and Douwe Kiela. 2024. Memgpt: Towards llms as operating systems. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems .
- Ori Ram, Eyal Shnarch, Jonathan Uziel, Lisa Haklay, and Amir Globerson. 2023. In-context retrievalaugmented language models. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 11:13161331.
- Preston Rasmussen, Pavlo Paliychuk, Travis Beauvais, Jack Ryan, and Daniel Chalef. 2025. Zep: A temporal knowledge graph architecture for agent memory. Preprint , arXiv:2501.13956. · arXiv
- Noah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan, and Shunyu Yao. 2024. Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume 36.
- Haoran Sun and Shaoning Zeng. 2025. Hierarchical memory for high-efficiency long-term reasoning in llm agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.22925 . · arXiv
- Weizhi Wang, Li Dong, Hao Cheng, Xiaodong Liu, Xifeng Yan, Jianfeng Gao, and Furu Wei. 2023. Longmem: Augmenting language models with longterm memory. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume 36, pages 20292-20306.
- Yu Wang and Xi Chen. 2025. Mirix: Multi-agent memory system for llm-based agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.07957 . · arXiv
- Di Wu, Hongwei Wang, Wenhao Yu, Yuwei Zhang, Kai-Wei Chang, and Dong Yu. 2025. Longmemeval: Benchmarking chat assistants on long-term interactive memory. Preprint , arXiv:2410.10813. · arXiv
- Zhiheng Xi, Wenxiang Chen, Xin Guo, Wei He, Yi Ding, Boyang Hong, Ming Zhang, Junzhe Wang, Senjie Jin, Enyu Zhou, and 1 others. 2023. The rise and potential of large language model based agents: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.07864 . · arXiv
- Chun Xia, Yinlin Deng, Soren Dunn, and Lingming Zhang. 2024. Agentless: Demystifying llm-based software engineering agents. ArXiv , abs/2407.01489. · arXiv
- Asaf Yehudai, Lilach Eden, Alan Li, Guy Uziel, Yilun Zhao, Roy Bar-Haim, Arman Cohan, and Michal Shmueli-Scheuer. 2025. Survey on evaluation of llmbased agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.16416 . · arXiv
- Manzil Zaheer, Guru Guruganesh, Avinava Dubey, Joshua Ainslie, Chris Alberti, Santiago Ontañón, Philip Pham, Anirudh Ravula, Qifan Wang, Li Yang, and Amr Ahmed. 2020. Big Bird: Transformers for longer sequences. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 17283-17296.
- Yanzhao Zhang, Mingxin Li, Dingkun Long, Xin Zhang, Huan Lin, Baosong Yang, Pengjun Xie, An Yang, Dayiheng Liu, Junyang Lin, Fei Huang, and Jingren Zhou. 2025. Qwen3 embedding: Advancing text embedding and reranking through foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.05176 . · arXiv
- Yuan Zheng and 1 others. 2024. Memoryllm: A framework for personalized and long-term dialogue generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.17122 . · arXiv
- WZhong, L Guo, Q Gao, and 1 others. 2024. Memorybank: Enhancing large language models with long-term memory. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume 38, pages 19724-19731.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
SmartSearch: How Ranking Beats Structure for Conversational Memory Retrieval
Derehag, J., Calva, C., & Ghiurau, T. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.15599
“LLM-structured memory: EverMemOS (Hu et al., 2026) uses an LLM agent to consolidate episodic memory into MemCells (atomic facts) and MemScenes (episode summaries), then performs agentic multi-round retrieval (BM25 + vector + exact match) at query time—achieving 92.3% on LoCoMo.”
InfluentialPollertlam, N., & Kornsuwannawit, W. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.04814
“More structured approaches—such as temporal semantic memory (Su et al., 2026), or hierarchical engram-based systems (Hu et al., 2026)—may recover recall that flat extraction loses, and could alter the accuracy comparison.”
Is Agent Memory a Database? Rethinking Data Foundations for Long-Term AI Agent Memory
Orogat, A., & Mansour, E. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.26252
“Consolidation-based systems [15, 39] overwrite or re-cluster at component grain, not along dependencies.”
InfluentialAnatomy of Agentic Memory: Taxonomy and Empirical Analysis of Evaluation and System Limitations
Jiang, D., Li, Y., Wei, S., Yang, J., Kishore, A., Zhao, A., Kang, D., Hu, X., Chen, F., Li, Q., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.19320
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, C., Gao, X., Zhou, Z., Xu, D., Bai, Y., Li, X., Zhang, H., Li, T., Zhang, C., Bing, L., & Deng, Y.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2601.02163
- OpenAlex
- W7118934407
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- long-horizon reasoning, large language models, episodic memory, memory consolidation, user profiling, agentic retrieval, foresight
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
