PreprintCited by 0Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsSpeech and dialogue systemsTopic Modeling

Mem-Gallery: Benchmarking Multimodal Long-Term Conversational Memory for MLLM Agents

Open access
Bei, Yuanchen, Wei, Tianxin, Ning, Xuying, Zhao, Yanjun, Liu, Zhining, Lin, Xiao, Zhu, Yada, Hamann, Hendrik +2 more·2026·arXiv

Abstract

Long-term memory is a critical capability for multimodal large language model (MLLM) agents, particularly in conversational settings where information accumulates and evolves over time. However, existing benchmarks either evaluate multi-session memory in text-only conversations or assess multimodal understanding within localized contexts, failing to evaluate how multimodal memory is preserved, organized, and evolved across long-term conversational trajectories. Thus, we introduce Mem-Gallery, a new benchmark for evaluating multimodal long-term conversational memory in MLLM agents. Mem-Gallery features high-quality multi-session conversations grounded in both visual and textual information, with long interaction horizons and rich multimodal dependencies. Building on this dataset, we propose a systematic evaluation framework that assesses key memory capabilities along three functional dimensions: memory extraction and test-time adaptation, memory reasoning, and memory knowledge management. Extensive benchmarking across thirteen memory systems reveals several key findings, highlighting the necessity of explicit multimodal information retention and memory organization, the persistent limitations in memory reasoning and knowledge management, as well as the efficiency bottleneck of current models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2601.03515

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A central challenge for next-generation foundation agents is designing memory systems that faithfully represent, align, and abstract heterogeneous sensory streams into coherent internal states.

    “A central challenge for next-generation foundation agents lies in designing memory systems that can faithfully represent, align, and abstract heterogeneous sensory streams, including vision, audio, language, tactile feedback, and proprioceptive signals, into coherent internal states (Bei et al., 2026).”

    From A Survey of Agent Memory in the Second Half: Towards Self-Evolving and Long-Horizon Agents (2026) · cites this paper as Bei et al., 2026

    Section 2.2 identifies the integration of multimodal information as a long-term memory challenge, and Appendix A.1 describes a memory system that combines visual and textual observations in a unified latent space. The paper does not support the sentence’s extension to audio, tactile feedback, or proprioception, or its broader claim about heterogeneous sensory streams in next-generation foundation agents. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Authors
Bei, Y., Wei, T., Ning, X., Zhao, Y., Liu, Z., Lin, X., Zhu, Y., Hamann, H., He, J., & Tong, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • IBM (United States) (US)
  • Brookhaven National Laboratory (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7119511293
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
conversational memory, multimodal large language models, benchmark dataset, memory extraction, test-time adaptation, knowledge management, memory organization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review