Beyond Dialogue Time: Temporal Semantic Memory for Personalized LLM Agents
Open accessAbstract
Memory enables Large Language Model (LLM) agents to perceive, store, and use information from past dialogues, which is essential for personalization. However, existing methods fail to properly model the temporal dimension of memory in two aspects: 1) Temporal inaccuracy: memories are organized by dialogue time rather than their actual occurrence time; 2) Temporal fragmentation: existing methods focus on point-wise memory, losing durative information that captures persistent states and evolving patterns. To address these limitations, we propose Temporal Semantic Memory (TSM), a memory framework that models semantic time for point-wise memory and supports the construction and utilization of durative memory. During memory construction, it first builds a semantic timeline rather than a dialogue one. Then, it consolidates temporally continuous and semantically related information into a durative memory. During memory utilization, it incorporates the query's temporal intent on the semantic timeline, enabling the retrieval of temporally appropriate durative memories and providing time-valid, duration-consistent context to support response generation. Experiments on LongMemEval and LoCoMo show that TSM consistently outperforms existing methods and achieves up to 12.2% absolute improvement in accuracy, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
TSM recovers 12.2 accuracy points on LongMemEval and LoCoMo by separating dialogue time from occurrence time.
“TSM [67] recovers 12 . 2 accuracy points on LongMemEval and LoCoMo by separating dialogue time from occurrence time, an axis production memories collapse.”
From TOKI: A Bitemporal Operator Algebra for Contradiction Resolution in LLM-Agent Persistent Memory (2026) · cites this paper as [67]
Cites
In Prospect and Retrospect: Reflective Memory Management for Long-term Personalized Dialogue Agents
Tan, Z., Yan, J., Hsu, I.-H., Han, R., Wang, Z., Le, L. T., Song, Y., Chen, Y., Palangi, H., Lee, G., et al. (2025) · arXiv · cited 2×
“For instance, the multiple entries within a week in Figure 1 together describe a coherent Tokyo trip; treating them independently ignores their temporal continuity and semantic relatedness, which in turn hinders the formation of persistent states and evolving patterns.”
MEM1: Learning to Synergize Memory and Reasoning for Efficient Long-Horizon Agents
Zhou, Z., Qu, A., Wu, Z., Kim, S., Prakash, A., Rus, D., Zhao, J., Low, B. K. H., & Liang, P. P. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.15841 · cited 2×
“…strategy-based, and skill-based learning in reflective and self-improving agents (Zhang et al., 2026; Shinn et al., 2023; Yan et al., 2025; Zhou et al., 2025; Ouyang et al., 2025); working memory provides mechanisms for the active management of transient context (Zhou et al., 2025; Zhang…”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pollertlam, N., & Kornsuwannawit, W. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.04814
“…memory have been identified for LLM agents: working memory covers the active context window; factual (long-term) memory persists user-specific information such as preferences and past events; and episodic memory records event-ordered sequences of interactions (Packer et al., 2024; Su et al., 2026).”
Anatomy of Agentic Memory: Taxonomy and Empirical Analysis of Evaluation and System Limitations
Jiang, D., Li, Y., Wei, S., Yang, J., Kishore, A., Zhao, A., Kang, D., Hu, X., Chen, F., Li, Q., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.19320
- Authors
- Su, M., Guo, Y., Hou, Z., Bai, L., Li, Z., Zhang, Y., Yin, G., Lin, W., Jin, X., Guo, J., & Cheng, X.
- Affiliations
- Meituan (China) (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2601.07468
- OpenAlex
- W7123800618
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Keywords
- LLM agents, personalized agents, memory retrieval, context generation, LongMemEval, LoCoMo
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review