PreprintCited by 3Speech and dialogue systemsTopic ModelingInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

Beyond Dialogue Time: Temporal Semantic Memory for Personalized LLM Agents

Open access
Su, Miao, Guo, Yucan, Hou, Zhongni, Bai, Long, Li, Zixuan, Zhang, Yufei, Yin, Guojun, Lin, Wei +3 more·2026·arXiv

Abstract

Memory enables Large Language Model (LLM) agents to perceive, store, and use information from past dialogues, which is essential for personalization. However, existing methods fail to properly model the temporal dimension of memory in two aspects: 1) Temporal inaccuracy: memories are organized by dialogue time rather than their actual occurrence time; 2) Temporal fragmentation: existing methods focus on point-wise memory, losing durative information that captures persistent states and evolving patterns. To address these limitations, we propose Temporal Semantic Memory (TSM), a memory framework that models semantic time for point-wise memory and supports the construction and utilization of durative memory. During memory construction, it first builds a semantic timeline rather than a dialogue one. Then, it consolidates temporally continuous and semantically related information into a durative memory. During memory utilization, it incorporates the query's temporal intent on the semantic timeline, enabling the retrieval of temporally appropriate durative memories and providing time-valid, duration-consistent context to support response generation. Experiments on LongMemEval and LoCoMo show that TSM consistently outperforms existing methods and achieves up to 12.2% absolute improvement in accuracy, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2601.07468

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TSM recovers 12.2 accuracy points on LongMemEval and LoCoMo by separating dialogue time from occurrence time.

    “TSM [67] recovers 12 . 2 accuracy points on LongMemEval and LoCoMo by separating dialogue time from occurrence time, an axis production memories collapse.”

    From TOKI: A Bitemporal Operator Algebra for Contradiction Resolution in LLM-Agent Persistent Memory (2026) · cites this paper as [67]

Cites

  • In Prospect and Retrospect: Reflective Memory Management for Long-term Personalized Dialogue Agents

    Tan, Z., Yan, J., Hsu, I.-H., Han, R., Wang, Z., Le, L. T., Song, Y., Chen, Y., Palangi, H., Lee, G., et al. (2025) · arXiv · cited 2×

    “For instance, the multiple entries within a week in Figure 1 together describe a coherent Tokyo trip; treating them independently ignores their temporal continuity and semantic relatedness, which in turn hinders the formation of persistent states and evolving patterns.”
  • MEM1: Learning to Synergize Memory and Reasoning for Efficient Long-Horizon Agents

    Zhou, Z., Qu, A., Wu, Z., Kim, S., Prakash, A., Rus, D., Zhao, J., Low, B. K. H., & Liang, P. P. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.15841 · cited 2×

    “…strategy-based, and skill-based learning in reflective and self-improving agents (Zhang et al., 2026; Shinn et al., 2023; Yan et al., 2025; Zhou et al., 2025; Ouyang et al., 2025); working memory provides mechanisms for the active management of transient context (Zhou et al., 2025; Zhang…”

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Su, M., Guo, Y., Hou, Z., Bai, L., Li, Z., Zhang, Y., Yin, G., Lin, W., Jin, X., Guo, J., & Cheng, X.
Affiliations
  • Meituan (China) (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7123800618
Cited by
0
References
2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
LLM agents, personalized agents, memory retrieval, context generation, LongMemEval, LoCoMo

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review