PreprintCited by 0Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningRobot Manipulation and Learning

Explore with Long-term Memory: A Benchmark and Multimodal LLM-based Reinforcement Learning Framework for Embodied Exploration

Open access
Wang, Sen, Liu, Bangwei, Gao, Zhenkun, Ma, Lizhuang, Wang, Xuhong, Xie, Yuan, Tan, Xin·2026·arXiv

Abstract

An ideal embodied agent should possess lifelong learning capabilities to handle long-horizon and complex tasks, enabling continuous operation in general environments. This not only requires the agent to accurately accomplish given tasks but also to leverage long-term episodic memory to optimize decision-making. However, existing mainstream one-shot embodied tasks primarily focus on task completion results, neglecting the crucial process of exploration and memory utilization. To address this, we propose Long-term Memory Embodied Exploration (LMEE), which aims to unify the agent's exploratory cognition and decision-making behaviors to promote lifelong learning. We further construct a corresponding dataset and benchmark, LMEE-Bench, incorporating multi-goal navigation and memory-based question answering to comprehensively evaluate both the process and outcome of embodied exploration. To enhance the agent's memory recall and proactive exploration capabilities, we propose MemoryExplorer, a novel method that fine-tunes a multimodal large language model through reinforcement learning to encourage active memory querying. By incorporating a multi-task reward function that includes action prediction, frontier selection, and question answering, our model achieves proactive exploration. Extensive experiments against state-of-the-art embodied exploration models demonstrate that our approach achieves significant advantages in long-horizon embodied tasks. Our dataset and code will be released at https://wangsen99.github.io/papers/lmee/

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2601.10744

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LLM agents begin to operate within hybrid environments that necessitate joint execution of linguistic reasoning and perception across multiple dimensions, such as embodied navigation and interactive web browsing.

    “As LLM agents begin to operate within hybrid environments that necessitate the joint execution of linguistic reasoning and perception across multiple dimensions, such as embodied navigation and interactive web browsing”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Authors
Wang, S., Liu, B., Gao, Z., Ma, L., Wang, X., Xie, Y., & Tan, X.
Affiliations
  • East China Normal University (CN)
  • Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7124703697
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (CSTB2023NSCQ-JQX0007, U23A20343, 62302167, 62222602)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (CSTB2023NSCQ-JQX0007, CSTB2023NSCQ)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
Keywords
lifelong learning, multimodal large language models, reinforcement learning, benchmark dataset, memory retrieval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review