CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 5AI-based Problem Solving and PlanningNatural Language Processing TechniquesArtificial Intelligence Applications

AOrchestra: Automating Sub-Agent Creation for Agentic Orchestration

Open access
Ruan, Jianhao, Xu, Zhihao, Peng, Yiran, Ren, Fashen, Yu, Zhaoyang, Liang, Xinbing, Xiang, Jinyu, Chen, Yongru +4 more·2026·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2602.03786arXiv 2602.03786
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Language agents have shown strong promise for task automation. Realizing this promise for increasingly complex, long-horizon tasks has driven the rise of a sub-agent-as-tools paradigm for multi-turn task solving. However, existing designs still lack a dynamic abstraction view of sub-agents, thereby hurting adaptability. We address this challenge with a unified, framework-agnostic agent abstraction that models any agent as a tuple Instruction, Context, Tools, Model. This tuple acts as a compositional recipe for capabilities, enabling the system to spawn specialized executors for each task on demand. Building on this abstraction, we introduce an agentic system AOrchestra, where the central orchestrator concretizes the tuple at each step: it curates task-relevant context, selects tools and models, and delegates execution via on-the-fly automatic agent creation. Such designs enable reducing human engineering efforts, and remain framework-agnostic with plug-and-play support for diverse agents as task executors. It also enables a controllable performance-cost trade-off, allowing the system to approach Pareto-efficient. Across three challenging benchmarks (GAIA, SWE-Bench, Terminal-Bench), AOrchestra achieves 16.28% relative improvement against the strongest baseline when paired with Gemini-3-Flash. The code is available at: https://github.com/FoundationAgents/AOrchestra

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2602.03786

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most existing MAS rely on centralized orchestration, where a main agent assigns work, collects outputs, and merges results.

    “However, most existing MAS rely on centralized orchestration, where a main agent assigns work, collects outputs, and merges results.”

    From Decentralized Multi-Agent Systems with Shared Context (2026) · cites this paper as Ruan et al., 2026

    The Introduction describes a main agent delegating tasks to sub-agents, and Related Work says most multi-agent systems use fixed workflows. Neither passage says most use centralized orchestration or that a main agent generally collects and merges their outputs. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Orchestration-based multi-agent methods primarily optimize how agents are created, routed, or composed, leaving the communication substrate itself unverified: intermediate outputs are passed, summarized, or aggregated without grounding each entry in its underlying evidence before downstream reuse.

    “However, the orchestration-based methods primarily optimize how agents are created, routed, or composed, leaving the communication substrate itself unverified: intermediate outputs are passed, summarized, or aggregated without grounding each entry in its underlying evidence before downstream reuse;”

    From Decentralized Multi-Agent Systems with Shared Context (2026) · cites this paper as Ruan et al., 2026

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Chen, G., Dong, S., Shu, Y., Zhang, G., Sesay, J., Karls- son, B. F., Fu, J., and Shi, Y. Autoagents: A frame- work for automatic agent generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.17288, 2023. · arXiv
  2. Fang, T., Zhang, Z., Wang, X., Wang, R., Qin, C., Wan, Y., Ma, J.-Y., Zhang, C., Chen, J., Li, X., et al. Cogni- tive kernel-pro: A framework for deep research agents and agent foundation models training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.00414, 2025. · arXiv
  3. Gao, H.-a., Geng, J., Hua, W., Hu, M., Juan, X., Liu, H., Liu, S., Qiu, J., Qi, X., Wu, Y., et al. A survey of self-evolving agents: On path to artificial super intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.21046, 2025a. · arXiv
  4. Gao, M., Li, Y., Liu, B., Yu, Y., Wang, P., Lin, C.-Y., and Lai, F. Single-agent or multi-agent systems? why not both? arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18286, 2025b. · arXiv
  5. Grand, G., Tenenbaum, J. B., Mansinghka, V. K., Lew, A. K., and Andreas, J. Self-steering language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.07081, 2025. · arXiv
  6. Hong, S., Zhuge, M., Chen, J., Zheng, X., Cheng, Y., Wang, J., Zhang, C., Wang, Z., Yau, S. K. S., Lin, Z., et al. Metagpt: Meta programming for a multi-agent collabora- tive framework. In The twelfth international conference on learning representations, 2023.
  7. Hu, M., Zhou, Y., Fan, W., Nie, Y., Xia, B., Sun, T., Ye, Z., Jin, Z., Li, Y., Chen, Q., et al. Owl: Optimized workforce learning for general multi-agent assistance in real-world task automation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.23885, 2025. · arXiv
  8. Jimenez, C. E., Yang, J., Wettig, A., Yao, S., Pei, K., Press, O., and Narasimhan, K. Swe-bench: Can language mod- els resolve real-world github issues? arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06770, 2023. · arXiv
  9. Li, B., Chen, C., Xue, Z., Mei, Y., and Luo, Y. Deepeye-sql: A software-engineering-inspired text-to-sql framework. CoRR, abs/2510.17586, 2025a. · arXiv
  10. Li, B., Zhang, J., Fan, J., Xu, Y., Chen, C., Tang, N., and Luo, Y. Alpha-sql: Zero-shot text-to-sql using monte carlo tree search. In ICML. OpenReview.net, 2025b.
  11. Li, W., Lin, J., Jiang, Z., Cao, J., Liu, X., Zhang, J., Huang, Z., Chen, Q., Sun, W., Wang, Q., et al. Chain-of-agents: End-to-end agent foundation models via multi-agent dis- tillation and agentic rl. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.13167, 2025c. · arXiv
  12. Lin, X., Qi, Y., Zhu, Y., Palpanas, T., Chai, C., Tang, N., and Luo, Y. LEAD: iterative data selection for efficient LLM instruction tuning. CoRR, abs/2505.07437, 2025. · arXiv
  13. Liu, A., Mei, A., Lin, B., Xue, B., Wang, B., Xu, B., Wu, B., Zhang, B., Lin, C., Dong, C., et al. Deepseek-v3. 2: Pushing the frontier of open large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.02556, 2025a. · arXiv
  14. Liu, B., Li, X., Zhang, J., Wang, J., He, T., Hong, S., Liu, H., Zhang, S., Song, K., Zhu, K., et al. Advances and challenges in foundation agents: From brain-inspired in- telligence to evolutionary, collaborative, and safe systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.01990, 2025b. · arXiv
  15. Liu, X., Shen, S., Li, B., Ma, P., Jiang, R., Zhang, Y., Fan, J., Li, G., Tang, N., and Luo, Y. A survey of text-to-sql in the era of llms: Where are we, and where are we going? IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 37(10):5735-5754, 2025c.
  16. Mialon, G., Fourrier, C., Wolf, T., LeCun, Y., and Scialom, T. Gaia: a benchmark for general ai assistants. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Represen- tations, 2023.
  17. Schroeder, P., Morgan, N. W., Luo, H., and Glass, J. Thread: Thinking deeper with recursive spawning. In Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 8418-8442, 2025.
  18. Shao, Z., Wang, P., Zhu, Q., Xu, R., Song, J., Bi, X., Zhang, H., Zhang, M., Li, Y., Wu, Y., et al. Deepseekmath: Push- ing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300, 2024. · arXiv
  19. Shi, D., Cao, J., Chen, Q., Sun, W., Li, W., Lu, H., Dong, F., Qin, T., Zhu, K., Liu, M., et al. Taskcraft: Automated gen- eration of agentic tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.10055, 2025a. · arXiv
  20. Shi, Y., Wang, M., Cao, Y., Lai, H., Lan, J., Han, X., Wang, Y., Geng, J., Li, Z., Xia, Z., et al. Aime: To- wards fully-autonomous multi-agent framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.11988, 2025b. · arXiv
  21. Su, H., Diao, S., Lu, X., Liu, M., Xu, J., Dong, X., Fu, Y., Belcak, P., Ye, H., Yin, H., et al. Toolorchestra: Elevating intelligence via efficient model and tool orchestration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21689, 2025. · arXiv
  22. Sun, W., Lu, M., Ling, Z., Liu, K., Yao, X., Yang, Y., and Chen, J. Scaling long-horizon llm agent via context- folding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11967, 2025. · arXiv
  23. Wang, X., Li, B., Song, Y., Xu, F. F., Tang, X., Zhuge, M., Pan, J., Song, Y., Li, B., Singh, J., et al. Openhands: An open platform for ai software developers as generalist agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.16741, 2024. · arXiv
  24. Wu, Q., Bansal, G., Zhang, J., Wu, Y., Li, B., Zhu, E., Jiang, L., Zhang, X., Zhang, S., Liu, J., et al. Autogen: Enabling next-gen llm applications via multi-agent conversations. In First Conference on Language Modeling, 2024.
  25. Xu, Z., Li, R., Li, J., Weng, R., Wang, J., Cai, X., and Wang, X. Unlocking implicit experience: Synthesizing tool-use trajectories from text. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.10355, 2026. · arXiv
  26. Yang, A., Li, A., Yang, B., Zhang, B., Hui, B., Zheng, B., Yu, B., Gao, C., Huang, C., Lv, C., et al. Qwen3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388, 2025. · arXiv
  27. Yang, J., Jimenez, C. E., Wettig, A., Lieret, K., Yao, S., Narasimhan, K. R., and Press, O. SWE-agent: Agent- computer interfaces enable automated software engi- neering. In The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.15793. · arXiv
  28. Yao, S., Zhao, J., Yu, D., Du, N., Shafran, I., Narasimhan, K. R., and Cao, Y. React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. In The eleventh international conference on learning representations, 2022.
  29. Yao, S., Shinn, N., Razavi, P., and Narasimhan, K. τ -bench: A benchmark for tool-agent-user interaction in real-world domains. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.12045, 2024. · arXiv
  30. Zhang, J., Xiang, J., Yu, Z., Teng, F., Chen, X., Chen, J., Zhuge, M., Cheng, X., Hong, S., Wang, J., et al. Aflow: Automating agentic workflow generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10762, 2024. · arXiv
  31. Zhang, J., Peng, Y., Kong, F., Cheng, Y., Wu, Y., Yu, Z., Xi- ang, J., Ruan, J., Wang, J., Song, M., et al. Autoenv: Au- tomated environments for measuring cross-environment agent learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.19304, 2025a. · arXiv
  32. Zhang, W., Cui, C., Zhao, Y., Liu, Y., and An, B. Agentorchestra: A hierarchical multi-agent framework for general-purpose task solving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.12508, 2025b. · arXiv
  33. Zheng, Y., Zhang, R., Zhang, J., Ye, Y., Luo, Z., Feng, Z., and Ma, Y. Llamafactory: Unified efficient fine-tuning of 100+ language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.13372, 2024. · arXiv
  34. Zhu, H., Qin, T., Zhu, K., Huang, H., Guan, Y., Xia, J., Yao, Y., Li, H., Wang, N., Liu, P., et al. Oagents: An empir- ical study of building effective agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15741, 2025a. · arXiv
  35. Zhu, Y., Wang, L., Yang, C., Lin, X., Li, B., Zhou, W., Liu, X., Peng, Z., Luo, T., Li, Y., Chai, C., Chen, C., Di, S., Fan, J., Sun, J., Tang, N., Tsung, F., Wang, J., Wu, C., Xu, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, Y., Zhou, X., Li, G., and Luo, Y. A survey of data agents: Emerging paradigm or overstated hype? CoRR, abs/2510.23587, 2025b. "gpt-5-mini": {"input":0.00025, "output": 0.002}, "claude-sonnet-4-20250514": {"input": 0.003, "output": 0.015}, "moonshotai/kimi-k2": {"input": 0.000296, "output": 0.001185}, "deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1": {"input":0.00025 , "output":0.001}, "deepseek-chat": {"input":0.00025 , "output":0.001}, "z-ai/glm-4.5": {"input": 0.00033, "output": 0.00132}, "gemini-2.5-pro": {"input": 0.00125, "output": 0.01}, "claude-4-sonnet": {"input": 0.003, "output": 0.015}, "claude-sonnet-4-5": {"input": 0.003, "output": 0.015}, "claude-4-5-haiku": {"input": 0.00088, "output": 0.0044}, "claude-4-sonnet-20250514": {"input": 0.003, "output": 0.015}, "gemini-2.5-flash": {"input": 0.0003, "output": 0.00252}, "gemini-3-flash-preview": {"input": 0.0005, "output": 0.003}, "gemini-3-pro-preview": {"input": 0.002, "output": 0.004}, "gemini-2.5-flash-image": {"input": 0.0003, "output": 0.03}, } / · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruan, J., Xu, Z., Peng, Y., Ren, F., Yu, Z., Liang, X., Xiang, J., Chen, Y., Liu, B., Wu, C., Luo, Y., & Zhang, J.
Affiliations
  • East China Normal University (CN)
  • Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute (CA)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2602.03786
arXiv
2602.03786
OpenAlex
W7127572889
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
agentic orchestration, multi-agent systems, task automation, tool selection, cost-performance trade-off, code generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review