The DOI matches its DataCite record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AgenticPay: A Multi-Agent LLM Negotiation System for Buyer-Seller Transactions
Abstract
Large language model (LLM)-based agents are increasingly expected to negotiate, coordinate, and transact autonomously, yet existing benchmarks lack principled settings for evaluating language-mediated economic interaction among multiple agents. We introduce AgenticPay, a benchmark and simulation framework for multi-agent buyer-seller negotiation driven by natural language. AgenticPay models markets in which buyers and sellers possess private constraints and product-dependent valuations, and must reach agreements through multi-round linguistic negotiation rather than numeric bidding alone. The framework supports a diverse suite of over 110 tasks ranging from bilateral bargaining to many-to-many markets, with structured action extraction and metrics for feasibility, efficiency, and welfare. Benchmarking state-of-the-art proprietary and open-weight LLMs reveals substantial gaps in negotiation performance and highlights challenges in long-horizon strategic reasoning, establishing AgenticPay as a foundation for studying agentic commerce and language-based market interaction. Code and dataset are available at the link: https://github.com/SafeRL-Lab/AgenticPay.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“AgenticPay (Liu et al., 2026) formalizes buyer-seller negotiation with private constraints, multi-turn bargaining, and welfare-oriented evaluation”
From Organizational Control Layer: Governance Infrastructure at the Execution Boundary of LLM Agent Systems (2026) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2026
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Survey on Large Language Model-Based Game Agents
Hu, S., Huang, T., Liu, G., Kompella, R. R., Ilhan, F., Tekin, S. F., Xu, Y., Yahn, Z., & Liu, L. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.02039 · Cited by 165
Comanici, G., Bieber, E., Schaekermann, M., Pasupat, I., Sachdeva, N., Dhillon, I., Blistein, M., Ram, O., Zhang, D., Rosen, E., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.06261 · Cited by 69
Self-citation
Cited by
Shi, T., Mo, Y., Liu, Y., Hao, Z., Wang, Y., Hu, W., Yu, N., Zhou, M., & Yu, J. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.04306 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, X., Gu, S., & Song, D.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- arXiv
- 2602.06008
- References
- 2
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
