PreprintCited by 1Web Data Mining and AnalysisInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

M$^2$: Dual-Memory Augmentation for Long-Horizon Web Agents via Trajectory Summarization and Insight Retrieval

Open access
Yan, Dawei, Zhang, Haokui, Huzhang, Guangda, Li, Yang, Wang, Yibo, Chen, Qing-Guo, Xu, Zhao, Luo, Weihua +3 more·2026·arXiv

Abstract

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) based agents have demonstrated remarkable potential in autonomous web navigation. However, handling long-horizon tasks remains a critical bottleneck. Prevailing strategies often rely heavily on extensive data collection and model training, yet still struggle with high computational costs and insufficient reasoning capabilities when facing complex, long-horizon scenarios. To address this, we propose M$^2$, a training-free, memory-augmented framework designed to optimize context efficiency and decision-making robustness. Our approach incorporates a dual-tier memory mechanism that synergizes Dynamic Trajectory Summarization (Internal Memory) to compress verbose interaction history into concise state updates, and Insight Retrieval Augmentation (External Memory) to guide the agent with actionable guidelines retrieved from an offline insight bank. Extensive evaluations across WebVoyager and OnlineMind2Web demonstrate that M$^2$ consistently surpasses baselines, yielding up to a 19.6% success rate increase and 58.7% token reduction for Qwen3-VL-32B, while proprietary models like Claude achieve accuracy gains up to 12.5% alongside significantly lower computational overhead.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2603.00503

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LLM agents begin to operate within hybrid environments that necessitate joint execution of linguistic reasoning and perception across multiple dimensions, such as embodied navigation and interactive web browsing.

    “As LLM agents begin to operate within hybrid environments that necessitate the joint execution of linguistic reasoning and perception across multiple dimensions, such as embodied navigation and interactive web browsing”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yan, D., Zhang, H., Huzhang, G., Li, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, Q.-G., Xu, Z., Luo, W., Li, Y., Dong, W., & Shen, C.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
Pages
1-10
ISSN
1520-9210 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7133315871
Cited by
0
References
2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Multimedia (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Data Mining and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
web agents, long-horizon tasks, memory-augmented agents, trajectory summarization, multimodal large language models, token reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review