PreprintCited by 1Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

From Verbatim to Gist: Distilling Pyramidal Multimodal Memory via Semantic Information Bottleneck for Long-Horizon Video Agents

Open access
Lian, Niu, Wang, Yuting, Yao, Hanshu, Wang, Jinpeng, Chen, Bin, Wang, Yaowei, Zhang, Min, Xia, Shu-Tao·2026·arXiv

Abstract

While multimodal large language models have demonstrated impressive short-term reasoning, they struggle with long-horizon video understanding due to limited context windows and static memory mechanisms that fail to mirror human cognitive efficiency. Existing paradigms typically fall into two extremes: vision-centric methods that incur high latency and redundancy through dense visual accumulation, or text-centric approaches that suffer from detail loss and hallucination via aggressive captioning. To bridge this gap, we propose MM-Mem, a pyramidal multimodal memory architecture grounded in Fuzzy-Trace Theory. MM-Mem structures memory hierarchically into a Sensory Buffer, Episodic Stream, and Symbolic Schema, enabling the progressive distillation of fine-grained perceptual traces (verbatim) into high-level semantic schemas (gist). Furthermore, to govern the dynamic construction of memory, we derive a Semantic Information Bottleneck objective and introduce SIB-GRPO to optimize the trade-off between memory compression and task-relevant information retention. In inference, we design an entropy-driven top-down memory retrieval strategy. Extensive experiments across 4 benchmarks confirm that MM-Mem achieves state-of-the-art performance on both offline and streaming tasks, demonstrating robust generalization and validating the effectiveness of cognition-inspired memory organization. Code and associated configurations are publicly available at https://github.com/EliSpectre/MM-Mem.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2603.01455

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multimodal memory unfolds along a continuous axis of time rather than in terms of discrete tokens as with text, rendering the organization of length and granularity for units of memory a consideration of significant importance.

    “Multimodal memory unfolds along a continuous axis of time rather than in terms of discrete tokens as with text, which renders the organization of length and granularity for units of memory a consideration of significant importance (Yang and Ren, 2025; Lian et al., 2026).”
  • Consolidation may incur the loss of perceptual details inherent to signals of a nontextual nature.

    “Finally, the process of consolidation may incur the loss of perceptual details inherent to signals of a nontextual nature (Lian et al., 2026).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lian, N., Wang, Y., Yao, H., Wang, J., Chen, B., Wang, Y., Zhang, M., & Xia, S.-T.
Affiliations
  • Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
  • Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7133351683
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
multimodal memory, fuzzy-trace theory, memory compression, memory hierarchy, video understanding, memory retrieval, multimodal large language models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review