PreprintCited by 1Speech and dialogue systemsInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorAI-based Problem Solving and Planning

AMemGym: Interactive Memory Benchmarking for Assistants in Long-Horizon Conversations

Open access
Jiayang, Cheng, Ru, Dongyu, Qiu, Lin, Li, Yiyang, Cao, Xuezhi, Song, Yangqiu, Cai, Xunliang·2026·arXiv

Abstract

Long-horizon interactions between users and LLM-based assistants necessitate effective memory management, yet current approaches face challenges in training and evaluation of memory. Existing memory benchmarks rely on static, off-policy data as context, limiting evaluation reliability and scalability. To address these gaps, we introduce AMemGym, an interactive environment enabling on-policy evaluation and optimization for memory-driven personalization. AMemGym employs structured data sampling to predefine user profiles, state-dependent questions, and state evolution trajectories, enabling cost-effective generation of high-quality, evaluation-aligned interactions. LLM-simulated users expose latent states through role-play while maintaining structured state consistency. Comprehensive metrics based on structured data guide both assessment and optimization of assistants. Extensive experiments reveal performance gaps in existing memory systems (e.g., RAG, long-context LLMs, and agentic memory) and corresponding reasons. AMemGym not only enables effective selection among competing approaches but also can potentially drive the self-evolution of memory management strategies. By bridging structured state evolution with free-form interactions, our framework provides a scalable, diagnostically rich environment for advancing memory capabilities in conversational agents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2603.01966

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AMemGym provides on-policy interactions with simulated users and structured latent-state evolution.

    “AMemGym [6] provides on-policy interactions with simulated users and structured latent-state evolution.”

    From MemGym: a Long-Horizon Memory Environment for LLM Agents (2026) · cites this paper as [6]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Prateek Chhikara, Dev Khant, Saket Aryan, Taranjeet Singh, and Deshraj Yadav. Mem0: Building production-ready ai agents with scalable long-term memory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19413, 2025. · arXiv
  2. Yiming Du, Hongru Wang, Zhengyi Zhao, Bin Liang, Baojun Wang, Wanjun Zhong, Zezhong Wang, and Kam-Fai Wong. Perltqa: A personal long-term memory dataset for memory classification, retrieval, and fusion in question answering. In Proceedings of the 10th SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing (SIGHAN-10), pp. 152-164, 2024. Google. Introducing gemini 2.0: our new ai model for the agentic era, 2024. URL https://blog.google/technology/google-deepmind/ google-gemini-ai-update-december-2024/. Google. Gemini 2.5: Our most intelligent ai model, 2025a. URL https://blog.google/ technology/google-deepmind/gemini-model-thinking-updates-march-2025/.
  3. Yuanzhe Hu, Yu Wang, and Julian McAuley. Evaluating memory in llm agents via incremental multi-turn interactions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.05257, 2025. · arXiv
  4. Bowen Jiang, Zhuoqun Hao, Young-Min Cho, Bryan Li, Yuan Yuan, Sihao Chen, Lyle Ungar, Camillo J Taylor, and Dan Roth. Know me, respond to me: Benchmarking llms for dynamic user profiling and personalized responses at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.14225, 2025. · arXiv
  5. Jiho Kim, Woosog Chay, Hyeonji Hwang, Daeun Kyung, Hyunseung Chung, Eunbyeol Cho, Yohan Jo, and Edward Choi. Dialsim: A real-time simulator for evaluating long-term multi-party dialogue understanding of conversational agents, 2024. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=W1x77vRucB.
  6. Dong-Ho Lee, Adyasha Maharana, Jay Pujara, Xiang Ren, and Francesco Barbieri. Realtalk: A 21-day real-world dataset for long-term conversation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13270, 2025. · arXiv
  7. Aixin Liu, Bei Feng, Bing Xue, Bingxuan Wang, Bochao Wu, Chengda Lu, Chenggang Zhao, Chengqi Deng, Chenyu Zhang, Chong Ruan, et al. Deepseek-v3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19437, 2024. · arXiv
  8. Jiarui Lu, Thomas Holleis, Yizhe Zhang, Bernhard Aumayer, Feng Nan, Haoping Bai, Shuang Ma, Shen Ma, Mengyu Li, Guoli Yin, et al. Toolsandbox: A stateful, conversational, interactive evaluation benchmark for llm tool use capabilities. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2025, pp. 1160-1183, 2025.
  9. Adyasha Maharana, Dong-Ho Lee, Sergey Tulyakov, Mohit Bansal, Francesco Barbieri, and Yuwei Fang. Evaluating very long-term conversational memory of llm agents. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 13851-13870, 2024.
  10. Sewon Min, Kalpesh Krishna, Xinxi Lyu, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Pang Koh, Mohit Iyyer, Luke Zettle- moyer, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. Factscore: Fine-grained atomic evaluation of factual precision in long form text generation. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 12076-12100, 2023.
  11. Ali Modarressi, Hanieh Deilamsalehy, Franck Dernoncourt, Trung Bui, Ryan A Rossi, Seunghyun Yoon, and Hinrich Schütze. Nolima: Long-context evaluation beyond literal matching. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.05167, 2025. · arXiv
  12. Jiayan Nan, Wenquan Ma, Wenlong Wu, and Yize Chen. Nemori: Self-organizing agent memory inspired by cognitive science. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.03341, 2025. · arXiv
  13. Charles Packer, Sarah Wooders, Kevin Lin, Vivian Fang, Shishir G Patil, Ion Stoica, and Joseph E Gonzalez. Memgpt: Towards llms as operating systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08560, 2023. · arXiv
  14. Liyan Tang, Philippe Laban, and Greg Durrett. Minicheck: Efficient fact-checking of llms on grounding doc- uments. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 8818-8847, 2024.
  15. Kimi Team, Yifan Bai, Yiping Bao, Guanduo Chen, Jiahao Chen, Ningxin Chen, Ruijue Chen, Yanru Chen, Yuankun Chen, Yutian Chen, et al. Kimi k2: Open agentic intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.20534, 2025. · arXiv
  16. Xingyao Wang, Zihan Wang, Jiateng Liu, Yangyi Chen, Lifan Yuan, Hao Peng, and Heng Ji. Mint: Evalu- ating llms in multi-turn interaction with tools and language feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.10691, 2023. · arXiv
  17. Di Wu, Hongwei Wang, Wenhao Yu, Yuwei Zhang, Kai-Wei Chang, and Dong Yu. Longmemeval: Bench- marking chat assistants on long-term interactive memory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10813, 2024. · arXiv
  18. Shirley Wu, Michel Galley, Baolin Peng, Hao Cheng, Gavin Li, Yao Dou, Weixin Cai, James Zou, Jure Leskovec, and Jianfeng Gao. Collabllm: From passive responders to active collaborators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.00640, 2025. · arXiv
  19. Jing Xu, Arthur Szlam, and Jason Weston. Beyond goldfish memory: Long-term open-domain conversation. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 5180-5197, 2022.
  20. Wujiang Xu, Kai Mei, Hang Gao, Juntao Tan, Zujie Liang, and Yongfeng Zhang. A-mem: Agentic memory for llm agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.12110, 2025. · arXiv
  21. An Yang, Anfeng Li, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chang Gao, Chengen Huang, Chenxu Lv, et al. Qwen3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388, 2025. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • MemGym: a Long-Horizon Memory Environment for LLM Agents

    Xu, W., Wang, Y., Mei, K., Liang, K., Wang, Z., Jin, M., Zhang, H., Zhang, S.-X., Hua, W., Sahu, S., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.20833

    “Most recently, AMA-Bench [57] evaluates memory over real and synthetic agentic trajectories with QA, while AMemGym [6] provides on-policy interactions with simulated users and structured latent-state evolution.”

Authors
Jiayang, C., Ru, D., Qiu, L., Li, Y., Cao, X., Song, Y., & Cai, X.
Affiliations
  • Meituan (China) (CN)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7162925810
Cited by
0
References
1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Keywords
memory management, role play, retrieval-augmented generation, long-context LLMs, agentic memory, chatbots

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review