The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EvoScientist: Towards Multi-Agent Evolving AI Scientists for End-to-End Scientific Discovery
Open accessAbstract
The increasing adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) has enabled AI scientists to perform complex end-to-end scientific discovery tasks requiring coordination of specialized roles, including idea generation and experimental execution. However, most state-of-the-art AI scientist systems rely on static, hand-designed pipelines and fail to adapt based on accumulated interaction histories. As a result, these systems overlook promising research directions, repeat failed experiments, and pursue infeasible ideas. To address this, we introduce EvoScientist, an evolving multi-agent AI scientist framework that continuously improves research strategies through persistent memory and self-evolution. EvoScientist comprises three specialized agents: a Researcher Agent (RA) for scientific idea generation, an Engineer Agent (EA) for experiment implementation and execution, and an Evolution Manager Agent (EMA) that distills insights from prior interactions into reusable knowledge. EvoScientist contains two persistent memory modules: (i) an ideation memory, which summarizes feasible research directions from top-ranked ideas while recording previously unsuccessful directions; and (ii) an experimentation memory, which captures effective data processing and model training strategies derived from code search trajectories and best-performing implementations. These modules enable the RA and EA to retrieve relevant prior strategies, improving idea quality and code execution success rates over time. Experiments show that EvoScientist outperforms 7 open-source and commercial state-of-the-art systems in scientific idea generation, achieving higher novelty, feasibility, relevance, and clarity via automatic and human evaluation. EvoScientist also substantially improves code execution success rates through multi-agent evolution, demonstrating persistent memory's effectiveness for end-to-end scientific discovery.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The AI-scientist theme has fragmented into dozens of domain-specific descendants.
“the theme has since fragmented into dozens of domain-specific descendants”
From Recursive Self-Improvement in AI: From Bounded Self-Refinement to Autonomous Research Loops (2026) · cites this paper as [174]
Citations
Cites
Robeyns, M., Szummer, M., & Aitchison, L. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.15228 · Cited by 117
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Red Queen Gödel Machine: Co-Evolving Agents and Their Evaluators
Iacob, A., Jovanović, A., Shen, W. F., Burkhardt, D., Kurmanji, M., Tastan, N., Sani, L., Venanzi, N. A. E., Nie, J., Odonnat, A., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.26294 · Cited by 1
“3.5).”
InfluentialRecursive Self-Improvement in AI: From Bounded Self-Refinement to Autonomous Research Loops
Chen, M., Wang, L., & Qu, B. (2026) · arXiv
“…and long-horizon proofs [167], Socratic agents pursuing “epistemic autonomy” in high-dimensional physics [168], evolving multi-agent scientists that adapt their own pipelines from accumulated history [169, 170], and infrastructure for coordinating fleets of research agents at web scale [171].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Lyu, Y., Zhang, X., Zhao, Y., Papakostas, K., Yi, X., Guo, S., Hu, W., Piotrowski, J., Kaliski, J., Urbani, J., Meng, Z., Zhou, L., Ren, Z., & Yan, X.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2603.08127
- OpenAlex
- W7134804927
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Keywords
- AI scientists, multi-agent systems, large language models, experiment execution, persistent memory, self-evolution, code search
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review