Diagnosing and Repairing Citation Failures in Generative Engine Optimization
Open accessAbstract
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) aims to improve content visibility in AI-generated responses. However, existing methods measure contribution-how much a document influences a response-rather than citation, the mechanism that actually drives traffic back to creators. Also, these methods apply generic rewriting rules uniformly, failing to diagnose why individual document are not cited. This paper introduces a diagnostic approach to GEO that asks why a document fails to be cited and intervenes accordingly. We develop a unified framework comprising: (1) the first taxonomy of citation failure modes spanning different stages of a citation pipeline; (2) AgentGEO, an agentic system that diagnoses failures using this taxonomy, selects targeted repairs from a corresponding tool library, and iterates until citation is achieved; and (3) a document-centric benchmark evaluating whether optimizations generalize across held-out queries. AgentGEO achieves over 40% relative improvement in citation rates while modifying only 5% of content, compared to 25% for baselines. Our analysis reveals that generic optimization can harm long-tail content and some documents face challenges that optimization alone cannot fully address-findings with implications for equitable visibility in AI-mediated information access.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Citation-repair work emphasizes that failures can occur across retrieval, fetching, parsing, attribution, and generation.
“Citation-repair work emphasizes that failures can occur across retrieval, fetching, parsing, attribution, and generation [3].”
From From Citation Selection to Citation Absorption: A Measurement Framework for Generative Engine Optimization Across AI Search Platforms (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
Section 3.2 identifies citation failures at fetching, parsing, and generation stages. Section 3.1 also describes failures in how sources are selected or attributed. But the taxonomy analyzes webpages that were already retrieved and not cited; it does not identify retrieval failure as one of its failure modes. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Aggarwal, P., Murahari, V., Rajpurohit, T., Kalyan, A., Narasimhan, K., and Deshpande, A. Geo: Generative engine optimization. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 5-16, 2024.
- Bevendorff, J., Stein, B., Hagen, M., and Potthast, M. Elas- tic ChatNoir: Search Engine for the ClueWeb and the Common Crawl. In Azzopardi, L., Hanbury, A., Pasi, G., and Piwowarski, B. (eds.), Advances in Information Retrieval. 40th European Conference on IR Research (ECIR 2018), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin Heidelberg New York, March 2018. Springer.
- Bohnet, B., Tran, V. Q., Verga, P., Aharoni, R., Andor, D., Soares, L. B., Ciaramita, M., Eisenstein, J., Ganchev, K., Herzig, J., et al. Attributed question answering: Evalua- tion and modeling for attributed large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.08037, 2022. · arXiv
- Broder, A. A taxonomy of web search. In ACM Sigir forum, volume 36, pp. 3-10. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2002.
- Chen, M., Wang, X., Chen, K., and Koudas, N. Generative engine optimization: How to dominate ai search. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.08919, 2025a. · arXiv
- Chen, Q., Chen, J., Huang, H., Shao, Q., Chen, J., Hua, R., Xu, H., Wu, R., Chuan, R., and Wu, J. Cc-gseo-bench: A content-centric benchmark for measuring source influ- ence in generative search engines, 2025b. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2509.05607.
- Coelho, J., Ning, J., He, J., Mao, K., Paladugu, A., Setlur, P., Jin, J., Callan, J., Magalhães, J., Martins, B., et al. Deepresearchgym: A free, transparent, and reproducible evaluation sandbox for deep research. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.19253, 2025. · arXiv
- Davis, H. Search engine optimization. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.", 2006.
- Gao, T., Yen, H., Yu, J., and Chen, D. Enabling large language models to generate text with citations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14627, 2023. · arXiv
- Jin, B., Zeng, H., Yue, Z., Yoon, J., Arik, S., Wang, D., Zamani, H., and Han, J. Search-r1: Training llms to reason and leverage search engines with reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.09516, 2025. · arXiv
- Karpukhin, V., Oguz, B., Min, S., Lewis, P. S., Wu, L., Edunov, S., Chen, D., and Yih, W.-t. Dense passage retrieval for open-domain question answering. In EMNLP (1), pp. 6769-6781, 2020.
- Killoran, J. B. How to use search engine optimization tech- niques to increase website visibility. IEEE Transactions on professional communication, 56(1):50-66, 2013.
- Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., Küttler, H., Lewis, M., Yih, W.-t., Rocktäschel, T., et al. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge- intensive nlp tasks. Advances in neural information pro- cessing systems, 33:9459-9474, 2020.
- Liu, N. F., Lin, K., Hewitt, J., Paranjape, A., Bevilacqua, M., Petroni, F., and Liang, P. Lost in the middle: How language models use long contexts. Transactions of the association for computational linguistics, 12:157-173, 2024.
- Mo, F., Meng, C., Aliannejadi, M., and Nie, J.-Y. Conversa- tional search: From fundamentals to frontiers in the llm era. In Proceedings of the 48th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 4094-4097, 2025.
- Nestaas, F., Debenedetti, E., and Tramèr, F. Adversarial search engine optimization for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.18382, 2024. · arXiv
- Niu, C., Wu, Y., Zhu, J., Xu, S., Shum, K., Zhong, R., Song, J., and Zhang, T. Ragtruth: A hallucination corpus for developing trustworthy retrieval-augmented language models. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 10862-10878, 2024.
- Overwijk, A., Xiong, C., and Callan, J. Clueweb22: 10 billion web documents with rich information. In Proceed- ings of the 45th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, pp. 3360-3362, 2022.
- Pfrommer, S., Bai, Y., Gautam, T., and Sojoudi, S. Ranking manipulation for conversational search engines. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.03589, 2024. · arXiv
- Rose, D. E. and Levinson, D. Understanding user goals in web search. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 13-19, 2004.
- Salemi, A. and Zamani, H. Evaluating retrieval quality in retrieval-augmented generation. In Proceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 2395- 2400, 2024.
- Slobodkin, A., Hirsch, E., Cattan, A., Schuster, T., and Da- gan, I. Attribute first, then generate: Locally-attributable grounded text generation. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 3309-3344, 2024.
- Tang, Y., Fan, Y., Yu, C., Yang, T., Zhao, Y., and Hu, X. Stealthrank: Llm ranking manipulation via stealthy prompt optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.05804, 2025. · arXiv
- Wu, Y., Zhong, S., Kim, Y., and Xiong, C. What generative search engines like and how to optimize web content cooperatively. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11438, 2025. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kai, Z., Xinyue, H., & Jingang, Y. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.25707 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Recent work has extended GEO toward AI search benchmarking, document-centric optimization, and diagnosis of citation failures [2,3].”
- Authors
- Tian, Z., Chen, Y., Tang, Y., Liu, J., & Jia, R.
- ORCID
- Jia, Ruoxi
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2603.09296
- OpenAlex
- W7134981048
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- generative engine optimization, AI-generated content, agentic systems, content visibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
