AutoAgent: Evolving Cognition and Elastic Memory Orchestration for Adaptive Agents
Open accessAbstract
Autonomous agent frameworks still struggle to reconcile long-term experiential learning with real-time, context-sensitive decision-making. In practice, this gap appears as static cognition, rigid workflow dependence, and inefficient context usage, which jointly limit adaptability in open-ended and non-stationary environments. To address these limitations, we present AutoAgent, a self-evolving multi-agent framework built on three tightly coupled components: evolving cognition, on-the-fly contextual decision-making, and elastic memory orchestration. At the core of AutoAgent, each agent maintains structured prompt-level cognition over tools, self-capabilities, peer expertise, and task knowledge. During execution, this cognition is combined with live task context to select actions from a unified space that includes tool calls, LLM-based generation, and inter-agent requests. To support efficient long-horizon reasoning, an Elastic Memory Orchestrator dynamically organizes interaction history by preserving raw records, compressing redundant trajectories, and constructing reusable episodic abstractions, thereby reducing token overhead while retaining decision-critical evidence. These components are integrated through a closed-loop cognitive evolution process that aligns intended actions with observed outcomes to continuously update cognition and expand reusable skills, without external retraining. Empirical results across retrieval-augmented reasoning, tool-augmented agent benchmarks, and embodied task environments show that AutoAgent consistently improves task success, tool-use efficiency, and collaborative robustness over static and memory-augmented baselines. Overall, AutoAgent provides a unified and practical foundation for adaptive autonomous agents that must learn from experience while making reliable context-aware decisions in dynamic environments.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ExpeL and AutoAgent operate at two levels simultaneously, but both use predetermined levels without adaptive selection.
“ExpeL (Zhao et al., 2024) and AutoAgent (Wang et al., 2026) operate at two levels simultaneously, but both use predetermined levels without adaptive selection: two-speed systems, not continuous spectra.”
From Experience Compression Spectrum: Unifying Memory, Skills, and Rules in LLM Agents (2026) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2026
The Dynamic Assembly Stage describes an adaptive selector that chooses, for each step, whether to use the full record, a compressed summary, or neither, based on the upcoming decision. This contradicts the claim that AutoAgent uses predetermined levels without adaptive selection. The paper does not establish the separate claim about ExpeL. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.03629, 2022. · arXiv
- Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessi, Roberta Raileanu, Maria Lomeli, Stephanie Hamburger, Luke Zettlemoyer, Nicola Cancedda, and Thomas Scialom. Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04761, 2023. · arXiv
- Guohao Li, Hasan Hammoud, Hani Itani, Dmitrii Khizbullin, and Bernard Ghanem. Camel: Communicative agents for "mind" exploration of large scale language model society. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17760, 2023. · arXiv
- Qingyun Wu et al. Autogen: Enabling next-gen llm applications via multi-agent conversation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08155, 2023. · arXiv
- Elon Karpas et al. Mrkl systems: A modular, neuro-symbolic architecture that combines large language models, external knowledge sources and discrete reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.00445, 2022. · arXiv
- Wenjun Li, Dexun Li, Kuicai Dong, Cong Zhang, Hao Zhang, Weiwen Liu, Yasheng Wang, Ruiming Tang, and Yong Liu. Adaptive tool use in large language models with meta-cognition trigger. In Wanxiang Che, Joyce Nabende, Ekaterina Shutova, and Mohammad Taher Pilehvar, editors, Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 13346-13370, Vienna, Austria, July 2025. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Yujia Qin et al. Toolbench: Towards realistic tool learning for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16504, 2023. · arXiv
- Zhi-Yuan Chen, Shiqi Shen, Guangyao Shen, Gong Zhi, Xu Chen, and Yankai Lin. Towards tool use alignment of large language models. In Yaser Al-Onaizan, Mohit Bansal, and Yun-Nung Chen, editors, Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1382-1400, Miami, Florida, USA, November 2024. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Weihao You, Shuo Yin, Xudong Zhao, Zhilong Ji, Guoqiang Zhong, and Jinfeng Bai. MuMath: Multi-perspective data augmentation for mathematical reasoning in large language models. In Kevin Duh, Helena Gomez, and Steven Bethard, editors, Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024, pages 2932-2958, Mexico City, Mexico, June 2024. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Junjie Ye, Zhengyin Du, Xuesong Yao, Weijian Lin, Yufei Xu, Zehui Chen, Zaiyuan Wang, Sining Zhu, Zhiheng Xi, Siyu Yuan, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang, and Jiecao Chen. ToolHop: A query-driven benchmark for evaluating large language models in multi-hop tool use. In Wanxiang Che, Joyce Nabende, Ekaterina Shutova, and Mohammad Taher Pilehvar, editors, Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 2995-3021, Vienna, Austria, July 2025. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Adrian Theuma and Ehsan Shareghi. Equipping language models with tool use capability for tabular data analysis in finance. In Yvette Graham and Matthew Purver, editors, Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pages 90-103, St. Julian's, Malta, March 2024. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Song Wang, Zhen Tan, Zihan Chen, Shuang Zhou, Tianlong Chen, and Jundong Li. AnyMAC: Cascading flexible multi-agent collaboration via next-agent prediction. In Christos Christodoulopoulos, Tanmoy Chakraborty, Carolyn Rose, and Violet Peng, editors, Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 11555-11567, Suzhou, China, November 2025. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- WenYuan Gu, JiaLe Han, HaoWen Wang, Xiang Li, and Bo Cheng. Explain-analyze-generate: A sequential multi-agent collaboration method for complex reasoning. In Owen Rambow, Leo Wanner, Marianna Apidianaki, Hend Al-Khalifa, Barbara Di Eugenio, and Steven Schockaert, editors, Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 7127-7140, Abu Dhabi, UAE, January 2025. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Charles Packer, Vivian Fang, Shishir G. Patil, Kevin Lin, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Ion Stoica, et al. Memgpt: Towards llms as operating systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08560, 2023. · arXiv
- Joon Sung Park, Joseph O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris, Percy Liang, and Michael S. Bernstein. Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03442, 2023. · arXiv
- Rana Salama, Jason Cai, Michelle Yuan, Anna Currey, Monica Sunkara, Yi Zhang, and Yassine Benajiba. MemInsight: Autonomous memory augmentation for LLM agents. In Christos Christodoulopoulos, Tanmoy Chakraborty, Carolyn Rose, and Violet Peng, editors, Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 33136-33152, Suzhou, China, November 2025. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Noah Shinn, Beck Labash, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan, and Shunyu Yao. Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11366, 2023. · arXiv
- Ding-Chu Zhang, Yida Zhao, Jialong Wu, Liwen Zhang, Baixuan Li, Wenbiao Yin, Yong Jiang, Yu-Feng Li, Kewei Tu, Pengjun Xie, and Fei Huang. EvolveSearch: An iterative self-evolving search agent. In Christos Christodoulopoulos, Tanmoy Chakraborty, Carolyn Rose, and Violet Peng, editors, Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 13123-13136, Suzhou, China, November 2025. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Shunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran, Karthik Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10601, 2023. · arXiv
- Guanzhi Wang et al. Voyager: An open-ended embodied agent with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16291, 2023. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Experience Compression Spectrum: Unifying Memory, Skills, and Rules in LLM Agents
Zhang, X., Wang, G., Cui, Y., Qiu, W., Li, Z., Zhu, B., & He, P. (2026) · arXiv
“…RL-optimized memory operations (Zhang et al., 2026b; Yan et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2025; Li et al., 2026a), meta-learned memory architectures (Xiong et al., 2026), multi-agent coordination (Lin et al., 2026), and governance with temporal decay (Lam et al., 2026)—but converging on the same…”
- Authors
- Wang, X., Liao, N., Wei, S., Tang, C., & Xiong, F.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2603.09716
- OpenAlex
- W7134914903
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
- Keywords
- autonomous agents, multi-agent systems, long-term memory, tool selection, contextual decision-making, cognitive evolution, retrieval-augmented reasoning, tool-augmented agents, embodied agents, collaborative agents, token efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review