PERMA: Benchmarking Personalized Memory Agents via Event-Driven Preference and Realistic Task Environments
Open accessAbstract
Empowering large language models with long-term memory is crucial for building agents that adapt to users' evolving needs. Existing evaluations of this capability typically interleave preference-related dialogues with irrelevant conversations, reducing the task to needle-in-a-haystack retrieval while ignoring relationships between events driving user preference evolution. Such settings overlook a fundamental characteristic of real-world personalization: preferences emerge gradually and accumulate across interactions within noisy contexts. To bridge this gap, we introduce PERMA, a benchmark designed to evaluate persona consistency over time beyond static preference recall. Additionally, we incorporate (1) text variability and (2) linguistic alignment to simulate erratic user inputs and individual idiolects in real-world data. PERMA consists of temporally ordered interaction events spanning multiple sessions and domains, with preference-related queries inserted over time. We design both multiple-choice and interactive tasks to probe the model's understanding of persona along the interaction timeline. Experiments demonstrate that by linking related interactions, advanced memory systems extract precise preferences and reduce token consumption, outperforming traditional semantic retrieval of raw dialogues. Nevertheless, they still struggle to maintain a coherent persona across temporal depth and cross-domain interference, highlighting the need for more robust personalized memory management in agents. Our code and data are open-sourced at https://github.com/PolarisLiu1/PERMA.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent work emphasizes cross-session information integration and long-term memory retention, evaluating consistency and tracking across sessions.
“To better align with real-world interactive settings, recent work [Maharana et al., 2024, Wu et al., 2025, Liu et al., 2026] emphasizes cross-session information integration and long-term memory retention, evaluating consistency and tracking across sessions.”
From VehicleMemBench: An Executable Benchmark for Multi-User Long-Term Memory in In-Vehicle Agents (2026) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2026
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Grattafiori, A., Dubey, A., Jauhri, A., Pandey, A., Kadian, A., Al-Dahle, A., Letman, A., Mathur, A., Schelten, A., Vaughan, A., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.21783 · Cited by 505 · see citing works
Self-citationHELMET: How to Evaluate Long-Context Language Models Effectively and Thoroughly
Yen, H., Gao, T., Hou, M., Ding, K., Fleischer, D., Izsak, P., Wasserblat, M., & Chen, D. (2024) · arXiv · Cited by 2 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The evaluation of long-context capabilities in LLMs [54, 66, 67] has historically relied on “Needle-in-a-Haystack” style tests that measure a model’s ability to retrieve facts embedded within lengthy contexts [26, 37].”
Memory for Autonomous LLM Agents:Mechanisms, Evaluation, and Emerging Frontiers
Du, P. (2026) · arXiv · Cited by 1 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recent work [8, 53, 63, 74] has begun to formalize this transition by treating memory as a structured, lifecycle-aware subsystem.”
RealMem: Benchmarking LLMs in Real-World Memory-Driven Interaction
Bian, H., Yao, Z., Hu, S., Xu, Z., Zhang, S., Guo, Y., Yang, Z., Han, X., Wang, H., & Chen, R. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.06966
MemoryArena: Benchmarking Agent Memory in Interdependent Multi-Session Agentic Tasks
He, Z., Wang, Y., Zhi, C., Hu, Y., Chen, T.-P., Yin, L., Chen, Z., Wu, T. A., Ouyang, S., Wang, Z., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.16313 · cited 1×
“At the core of personalized interaction and lifelong digital companions [58] lies the concept of user preferences [9, 41, 72], defined as the longitudinal collection of a user’s stable interests, stylistic inclinations, and task-specific constraints [15].”
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 72
- [1]Qingyao Ai, Yichen Tang, Changyue Wang, Jianming Long, Weihang Su, and Yiqun Liu. Memorybench: A benchmark for memory and continual learning in llm systems, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.17281 . · arXiv
- [3]Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. Language models are few-shot learners, 2020. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165 . · arXiv
- [5]Yuhao Chen, Yuanjie Lyu, Shuochen Liu, Chao Zhang, Junhui Lv, and Tong Xu. Think wider, detect sharper: Reinforced reference coverage for document-level self-contradiction detection. In Christos Christodoulopoulos, Tanmoy Chakraborty, Carolyn Rose, and Violet Peng, editors, Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1273-1288, Suzhou, China, November 2025. Association for Computational Linguistics. ISBN 979-8-89176-332-6. doi: 10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.67. URL https: //aclanthology.org/2025.emnlp-main.67/ . · DOI
- [6]Prateek Chhikara, Dev Khant, Saket Aryan, Taranjeet Singh, and Deshraj Yadav. Mem0: Building productionready ai agents with scalable long-term memory, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.19413 . · arXiv
- [7]Gheorghe Comanici, Eric Bieber, Mike Schaekermann, et al. Gemini 2.5: Pushing the frontier with advanced reasoning, multimodality, long context, and next generation agentic capabilities, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2507.06261 . · arXiv
- [9]Yiming Du, Hongru Wang, Zhengyi Zhao, Bin Liang, Baojun Wang, Wanjun Zhong, Zezhong Wang, and Kam-Fai Wong. Perltqa: A personal long-term memory dataset for memory classification, retrieval, and synthesis in question answering, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.16288 . · arXiv
- [10]Jizhan Fang, Xinle Deng, Haoming Xu, Ziyan Jiang, Yuqi Tang, Ziwen Xu, Shumin Deng, Yunzhi Yao, Mengru Wang, Shuofei Qiao, Huajun Chen, and Ningyu Zhang. Lightmem: Lightweight and efficient memory-augmented generation, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.18866 . · arXiv
- [11]Xueyang Feng, Weinan Gan, Xu Chen, Quanyu Dai, and Yong Liu. How does personalized memory shape llm behavior? benchmarking rational preference utilization in personalized assistants, 2026. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2601.16621 .
- [12]Yunfan Gao, Yun Xiong, Xinyu Gao, Kangxiang Jia, Jinliu Pan, Yuxi Bi, Yi Dai, Jiawei Sun, Meng Wang, and Haofen Wang. Retrieval-augmented generation for large language models: A survey, 2024. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2312.10997 .
- [13]GLM-5-Team, :, Aohan Zeng, Xin Lv, Zhenyu Hou, et al. Glm-5: from vibe coding to agentic engineering, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15763 . · arXiv
- [16]Chuanrui Hu, Xingze Gao, Zuyi Zhou, Dannong Xu, Yi Bai, Xintong Li, Hui Zhang, Tong Li, Chong Zhang, Lidong Bing, and Yafeng Deng. Evermemos: A self-organizing memory operating system for structured long-horizon reasoning, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.02163 . · arXiv
- [17]Yulin Hu, Zimo Long, Jiahe Guo, Xingyu Sui, Xing Fu, Weixiang Zhao, Yanyan Zhao, and Bing Qin. Opbench: Benchmarking over-personalization for memory-augmented personalized conversational agents, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13722 . · arXiv
- [18]Yuyang Hu, Shichun Liu, Yanwei Yue, et al. Memory in the age of ai agents, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2512.13564 . · arXiv
- [19]Bowen Jiang, Zhuoqun Hao, Young-Min Cho, Bryan Li, Yuan Yuan, Sihao Chen, Lyle Ungar, Camillo J. Taylor, and Dan Roth. Know me, respond to me: Benchmarking llms for dynamic user profiling and personalized responses at scale, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14225 . · arXiv
- [20]Bowen Jiang, Yuan Yuan, Maohao Shen, Zhuoqun Hao, Zhangchen Xu, Zichen Chen, Ziyi Liu, Anvesh Rao Vijjini, Jiashu He, Hanchao Yu, Radha Poovendran, Gregory Wornell, Lyle Ungar, Dan Roth, Sihao Chen, and Camillo Jose Taylor. Personamem-v2: Towards personalized intelligence via learning implicit user personas and agentic memory, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.06688 . · arXiv
- [21]Hannah Rose Kirk, Alexander Whitefield, Paul Röttger, Andrew Bean, Katerina Margatina, Juan Ciro, Rafael Mosquera, Max Bartolo, Adina Williams, He He, Bertie Vidgen, and Scott A. Hale. The prism alignment dataset: What participatory, representative and individualised human feedback reveals about the subjective and multicultural alignment of large language models, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16019 . · arXiv
- [22]Hao Li, Chenghao Yang, An Zhang, Yang Deng, Xiang Wang, and Tat-Seng Chua. Hello again! llm-powered personalized agent for long-term dialogue, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.05925 . · arXiv
- [23]Xiaopeng Li, Pengyue Jia, Derong Xu, Yi Wen, Yingyi Zhang, Wenlin Zhang, Wanyu Wang, Yichao Wang, Zhaocheng Du, Xiangyang Li, Yong Liu, Huifeng Guo, Ruiming Tang, and Xiangyu Zhao. A survey of personalization: From rag to agent, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.10147 . · arXiv
- [24]Yuanchun Li, Hao Wen, Weijun Wang, Xiangyu Li, Yizhen Yuan, Guohong Liu, Jiacheng Liu, Wenxing Xu, Xiang Wang, Yi Sun, Rui Kong, Yile Wang, Hanfei Geng, Jian Luan, Xuefeng Jin, Zilong Ye, Guanjing Xiong, Fan Zhang, Xiang Li, Mengwei Xu, Zhijun Li, Peng Li, Yang Liu, Ya-Qin Zhang, and Yunxin Liu. Personal llm agents: Insights and survey about the capability, efficiency and security, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.05459 . · arXiv
- [25]Zhiyu Li, Chenyang Xi, Chunyu Li, Ding Chen, et al. Memos: A memory os for ai system, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.03724 . · arXiv
- [26]Nelson F. Liu, Kevin Lin, John Hewitt, Ashwin Paranjape, Michele Bevilacqua, Fabio Petroni, and Percy Liang. Lost in the middle: How language models use long contexts, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.03172 . · arXiv
- [27]Shuochen Liu, Pengfei Luo, Chao Zhang, Yuhao Chen, Haotian Zhang, Qi Liu, Xin Kou, Tong Xu, and Enhong Chen. Look as you think: Unifying reasoning and visual evidence attribution for verifiable document rag via reinforcement learning, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.12003 . · arXiv
- [28]Pengfei Luo, Jingbo Zhou, Tong Xu, Yuan Xia, Linli Xu, and Enhong Chen. Imagescope: Unifying language-guided image retrieval via large multimodal model collective reasoning, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.10166 . · arXiv
- [29]Yuanjie Lyu, Zhiyu Li, Simin Niu, Feiyu Xiong, Bo Tang, Wenjin Wang, Hao Wu, Huanyong Liu, Tong Xu, and Enhong Chen. Crud-rag: A comprehensive chinese benchmark for retrieval-augmented generation of large language models, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.17043 . · arXiv
- [30]Shengjie Ma, Chengjin Xu, Xuhui Jiang, Muzhi Li, Huaren Qu, Cehao Yang, Jiaxin Mao, and Jian Guo. Thinkon-graph 2.0: Deep and faithful large language model reasoning with knowledge-guided retrieval augmented generation, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10805 . · arXiv
- [31]Xinbei Ma, Yeyun Gong, Pengcheng He, Hai Zhao, and Nan Duan. Query rewriting in retrieval-augmented large language models. In EMNLP, pages 5303-5315, 2023.
- [32]Adyasha Maharana, Dong-Ho Lee, Sergey Tulyakov, Mohit Bansal, Francesco Barbieri, and Yuwei Fang. Evaluating very long-term conversational memory of llm agents, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.17753 . · arXiv
- [33]Wenyu Mao, Haoyang Liu, Zhao Liu, Haosong Tan, Yaorui Shi, Jiancan Wu, An Zhang, and Xiang Wang. Collaborative multi-agent optimization for personalized memory system, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2603.12631 .
- Sabharwal, Karthik Narasimhan, and Ashwin Kalyan, editors, Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Personalization of Generative AI Systems (PERSONALIZE 2024), pages 119-123, St. Julians, Malta, March 2024. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2024.personalize-1.11. URL https://aclanthology.org/2024. personalize-1.11/ . · DOI
- [35]OpenAI. Gpt-4o system card, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21276 . · arXiv
- [36]OpenAI, :, Aaron Jaech, Adam Kalai, Adam Lerer, et al. Openai o1 system card, 2024. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2412.16720 .
- [37]OpenAI, Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, et al. Gpt-4 technical report, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2303. 08774 .
- [38]Cheng Qian, Zuxin Liu, Akshara Prabhakar, Zhiwei Liu, Jianguo Zhang, Haolin Chen, Heng Ji, Weiran Yao, Shelby Heinecke, Silvio Savarese, Caiming Xiong, and Huan Wang. Userbench: An interactive gym environment for user-centric agents, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.22034 . · arXiv
- [40]Qwen, :, An Yang, Baosong Yang, et al. Qwen2.5 technical report, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2412. 15115 .
- [41]Kan Ren, Jiarui Qin, Yuchen Fang, Weinan Zhang, Lei Zheng, Weijie Bian, Guorui Zhou, Jian Xu, Yong Yu, Xiaoqiang Zhu, and Kun Gai. Lifelong sequential modeling with personalized memorization for user response prediction. In Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '19, page 565-574. ACM, July 2019. doi: 10.1145/3331184.3331230. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3331184.3331230 . · DOI
- [42]Alireza Rezazadeh, Zichao Li, Wei Wei, and Yujia Bao. From isolated conversations to hierarchical schemas: Dynamic tree memory representation for llms, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14052 . · arXiv
- [43]Alaa Saleh, Sasu Tarkoma, Anders Lindgren, Praveen Kumar Donta, Schahram Dustdar, Susanna Pirttikangas, and Lauri Lovén. Memindex: Agentic event-based distributed memory management for multi-agent systems. ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst., November 2025. ISSN 1556-4665. doi: 10.1145/3774946. URL https: //doi.org/10.1145/3774946 . Just Accepted. · DOI
- [44]Parth Sarthi, Salman Abdullah, Aditi Tuli, Shubh Khanna, Anna Goldie, and Christopher D Manning. RAPTOR: Recursive abstractive processing for tree-organized retrieval. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024.
- [45]Yaorui Shi, Yuxin Chen, Siyuan Wang, Sihang Li, Hengxing Cai, Qi Gu, Xiang Wang, and An Zhang. Look back to reason forward: Revisitable memory for long-context llm agents, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.23040 . · arXiv
- [46]Juntao Tan, Liangwei Yang, Zuxin Liu, Zhiwei Liu, Rithesh RN, Tulika Manoj Awalgaonkar, Jianguo Zhang, Weiran Yao, Ming Zhu, Shirley Kokane, et al. Personabench: Evaluating ai models on understanding personal information through accessing (synthetic) private user data. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025, pages 878-893, 2025.
- [47]Dawei Tao, Enqi Liu, Sidath Randeni Kadupitige, Michael Cahill, Alan Fekete, and Uwe Röhm. First past the post: Evaluating query optimization in mongodb, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.16544 . · arXiv
- [48]Mohammad Tavakoli, Alireza Salemi, Carrie Ye, Mohamed Abdalla, Hamed Zamani, and J Ross Mitchell. Beyond a million tokens: Benchmarking and enhancing long-term memory in llms, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2510.27246 .
- [49]Kimi Team, Tongtong Bai, Yifan Bai, et al. Kimi k2.5: Visual agentic intelligence, 2026. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2602.02276 .
- [50]Haoye Tian, Chong Wang, BoYang Yang, Lyuye Zhang, and Yang Liu. A taxonomy of prompt defects in llm systems, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.14404 . · arXiv
- [51]Jianguo Wang, Xiaomeng Yi, Rentong Guo, et al. Milvus: A purpose-built vector data management system. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Management of Data, SIGMOD '21, page 2614-2627, New York, NY, USA, 2021. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450383431. doi: 10.1145/3448016.3457550. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3448016.3457550 . · DOI
- [52]Shuting Wang, Xin Yu, Mang Wang, Weipeng Chen, Yutao Zhu, and Zhicheng Dou. Richrag: Crafting rich responses for multi-faceted queries in retrieval-augmented generation. In COLING, pages 11317-11333, 2025.
- [53]Yu Wang and Xi Chen. Mirix: Multi-agent memory system for llm-based agents, 2025. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2507.07957 .
- [54]Zhaowei Wang, Wenhao Yu, Xiyu Ren, Jipeng Zhang, Yu Zhao, Rohit Saxena, Liang Cheng, Ginny Wong, Simon See, Pasquale Minervini, Yangqiu Song, and Mark Steedman. Mmlongbench: Benchmarking long-context vision-language models effectively and thoroughly, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.10610 . · arXiv
- [55]Zora Zhiruo Wang, Jiayuan Mao, Daniel Fried, and Graham Neubig. Agent workflow memory. In Forty-second International Conference on Machine Learning, 2025. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=NTAhi2JEEE .
- [56]Peter West and Christopher Potts. Base models beat aligned models at randomness and creativity. In Second Conference on Language Modeling, 2025. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=vqN8uom4A1 .
- [57]Di Wu, Hongwei Wang, Wenhao Yu, Yuwei Zhang, Kai-Wei Chang, and Dong Yu. Longmemeval: Benchmarking chat assistants on long-term interactive memory, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10813 . · arXiv
- [58]Tingyu Wu, Zhisheng Chen, Ziyan Weng, Shuhe Wang, Chenglong Li, Shuo Zhang, Sen Hu, Silin Wu, Qizhen Lan, Huacan Wang, and Ronghao Chen. Knowme-bench: Benchmarking person understanding for lifelong digital companions, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04745 . · arXiv
- [59]Derong Xu, Ziheng Zhang, Zhenxi Lin, Xian Wu, Zhihong Zhu, Tong Xu, Xiangyu Zhao, Yefeng Zheng, and Enhong Chen. Multi-perspective improvement of knowledge graph completion with large language models. In LREC/COLING, 2024.
- [60]Derong Xu, Xinhang Li, Ziheng Zhang, Zhenxi Lin, Zhihong Zhu, Zhi Zheng, Xian Wu, Xiangyu Zhao, Tong Xu, and Enhong Chen. Harnessing large language models for knowledge graph question answering via adaptive multi-aspect retrieval-augmentation, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.18537 . · arXiv
- [61]Derong Xu, Yi Wen, Pengyue Jia, Yingyi Zhang, wenlin zhang, Yichao Wang, Huifeng Guo, Ruiming Tang, Xiangyu Zhao, Enhong Chen, and Tong Xu. From single to multi-granularity: Toward long-term memory association and selection of conversational agents, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.19549 . · arXiv
- [62]Derong Xu, Pengyue Jia, Xiaopeng Li, Yingyi Zhang, Maolin Wang, Qidong Liu, Xiangyu Zhao, Yichao Wang, Huifeng Guo, Ruiming Tang, Enhong Chen, and Tong Xu. Align-grag: Anchor and rationale guided dual alignment for graph retrieval-augmented generation, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16237 . · arXiv
- [63]Wujiang Xu, Zujie Liang, Kai Mei, Hang Gao, Juntao Tan, and Yongfeng Zhang. A-mem: Agentic memory for llm agents, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12110 . · arXiv
- [64]Yue Xu, Qian Chen, Zizhan Ma, Dongrui Liu, Wenxuan Wang, Xiting Wang, Li Xiong, and Wenjie Wang. Toward personalized llm-powered agents: Foundations, evaluation, and future directions, 2026. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2602.22680 .
- [65]Sikuan Yan, Xiufeng Yang, Zuchao Huang, Ercong Nie, Zifeng Ding, Zonggen Li, Xiaowen Ma, Jinhe Bi, Kristian Kersting, Jeff Z. Pan, Hinrich Schütze, Volker Tresp, and Yunpu Ma. Memory-r1: Enhancing large language model agents to manage and utilize memories via reinforcement learning, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2508.19828 .
- [66]An Yang, Anfeng Li, Baosong Yang, et al. Qwen3 technical report, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2505. 09388 .
- [68]Hongli Yu, Tinghong Chen, Jiangtao Feng, Jiangjie Chen, Weinan Dai, Qiying Yu, Ya-Qin Zhang, Wei-Ying Ma, Jingjing Liu, Mingxuan Wang, and Hao Zhou. Memagent: Reshaping long-context llm with multi-conv rl-based memory agent, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.02259 . · arXiv
- [69]Qianhao Yuan, Jie Lou, Zichao Li, Jiawei Chen, Yaojie Lu, Hongyu Lin, Le Sun, Debing Zhang, and Xianpei Han. Memsearcher: Training llms to reason, search and manage memory via end-to-end reinforcement learning, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.02805 . · arXiv
- [70]Zhenrui Yue, Honglei Zhuang, Aijun Bai, Kai Hui, Rolf Jagerman, Hansi Zeng, Zhen Qin, Dong Wang, Xuanhui Wang, and Michael Bendersky. Inference scaling for long-context retrieval augmented generation, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04343 . · arXiv
- [71]Chao Zhang, Yuhao Wang, Derong Xu, Haoxin Zhang, Yuanjie Lyu, Yuhao Chen, Shuochen Liu, Tong Xu, Xiangyu Zhao, Yan Gao, Yao Hu, and Enhong Chen. Tearag: A token-efficient agentic retrieval-augmented generation framework, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.05385 . · arXiv
- [72]Xiaotian Zhang, Yuan Wang, Ruizhe Chen, Zeya Wang, Runchen Hou, and Zuozhu Liu. Towards proactive personalization through profile customization for individual users in dialogues, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2512.15302 . · arXiv
- [73]Yuxiang Zhang, Jiangming Shu, Ye Ma, Xueyuan Lin, Shangxi Wu, and Jitao Sang. Memory as action: Autonomous context curation for long-horizon agentic tasks, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12635 . · arXiv
- [74]Zeyu Zhang, Xiaohe Bo, Chen Ma, Rui Li, Xu Chen, Quanyu Dai, Jieming Zhu, Zhenhua Dong, and JiRong Wen. A survey on the memory mechanism of large language model based agents, 2024. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2404.13501 .
- [75]Siyan Zhao, Mingyi Hong, Yang Liu, Devamanyu Hazarika, and Kaixiang Lin. Do llms recognize your preferences? evaluating personalized preference following in llms, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.09597 . · arXiv
- [76]Wenting Zhao, Xiang Ren, Jack Hessel, Claire Cardie, Yejin Choi, and Yuntian Deng. Wildchat: 1m chatgpt interaction logs in the wild, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.01470 . · arXiv
- [77]Zheng Zhao, Clara Vania, Subhradeep Kayal, Naila Khan, Shay B. Cohen, and Emine Yilmaz. Personalens: A benchmark for personalization evaluation in conversational ai assistants, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2506.09902 .
- [78]Junhao Zheng, Chengming Shi, Xidi Cai, Qiuke Li, Duzhen Zhang, Chenxing Li, Dong Yu, and Qianli Ma. Lifelong learning of large language model based agents: A roadmap, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.07278 . · arXiv
- [79]Junyi Zhu, Shuochen Liu, Yu Yu, Bo Tang, Yibo Yan, Zhiyu Li, Feiyu Xiong, Tong Xu, and Matthew B. Blaschko. Fastmem: Fast memorization of prompt improves context awareness of large language models, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.16069 . · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
VehicleMemBench: An Executable Benchmark for Multi-User Long-Term Memory in In-Vehicle Agents
Chen, Y., Xu, Y., Ding, X., Fang, X., Liu, S., Lin, L., Zhang, Q., Li, Y., Liu, Q., & Xu, T. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.23840
Self-citation
- Authors
- Liu, S., Zhu, J., Shu, L., Lin, J., Chen, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, C., Xu, D., Li, J., Tang, B., Li, Z., Xiong, F., Chen, E., & Xu, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2603.23231
- OpenAlex
- W7140323224
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Keywords
- long-term memory, large language models, preference evolution, persona consistency, benchmarking, linguistic alignment, token efficiency, semantic search
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review