PreprintCited by 1Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsEvolutionary Algorithms and ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence Applications

From AI Assistant to AI Scientist: Autonomous Discovery of LLM-RL Algorithms with LLM Agents

Open access
Xia, Sirui, Zhang, Yikai, Chen, Aili, Wu, Siye, Yuan, Siyu, Xiao, Yanghua·2026·arXiv

Abstract

Discovering improved policy optimization algorithms for language models remains a costly manual process requiring repeated mechanism-level modification and validation. Unlike simple combinatorial code search, this problem requires searching over algorithmic mechanisms tightly coupled with training dynamics while reusing empirical evidence across iterations. We propose POISE, a closed-loop framework for automated discovery of policy optimization algorithms for language models. POISE maintains a structured, genealogically linked archive linking proposals, executable implementations, standardized evaluations, and natural-language reflections to support evidence-driven iteration. In mathematical reasoning experiments starting from GRPO, POISE evaluates 64 candidate algorithms and discovers improved mechanisms, including analytic-variance scaling and validity masking. The best variant improves weighted Overall from 47.8 to 52.5 (+4.6) and increases AIME25 pass@32 from 26.7% to 43.3%, demonstrating the feasibility of automated policy optimization discovery while supporting interpretable design principles.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2603.23951

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EVOM meta-evolves actor-critic architectures, POISE autonomously discovers new policy-optimization algorithms for LLM training itself, and MLEvolve targets machine-learning engineering pipelines end to end.

    “EVOM meta-evolves actor-critic architectures [165]; POISE autonomously discovers new policy-optimization algorithms for LLM training itself [166]; MLEvolve targets machine-learning engineering pipelines end to end [167].”

    From Recursive Self-Improvement in AI: From Bounded Self-Refinement to Autonomous Research Loops (2026) · cites this paper as [166]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xia, S., Zhang, Y., Chen, A., Wu, S., Yuan, S., & Xiao, Y.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
Pages
52498-52523
OpenAlex
W7140405501
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
large language models, reinforcement learning from human feedback, LLM agents, Group Relative Policy Optimization, poise, interpretability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review