PreprintCited by 1Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network Applications

TED: Training-Free Experience Distillation for Multimodal Reasoning

Open access
Yuan, Shuozhi, Wang, Jinqing, Liu, Zihao, Yuan, Miaomiao, Peng, Haoran, Zhao, Jin, Wang, Bingwen, Wang, Haoyi·2026·arXiv

Abstract

Knowledge distillation is typically realized by transferring a teacher model's knowledge into a student's parameters through supervised or reinforcement-based optimization. While effective, such approaches require repeated parameter updates and large-scale training data, limiting their applicability in resource-constrained environments. In this work, we propose TED, a training-free, context-based distillation framework that shifts the update target of distillation from model parameters to an in-context experience injected into the student's prompt. For each input, the student generates multiple reasoning trajectories, while a teacher independently produces its own solution. The teacher then compares the student trajectories with its reasoning and the ground-truth answer, extracting generalized experiences that capture effective reasoning patterns. These experiences are continuously refined and updated over time. A key challenge of context-based distillation is unbounded experience growth and noise accumulation. TED addresses this with an experience compression mechanism that tracks usage statistics and selectively merges, rewrites, or removes low-utility experiences. Experiments on multimodal reasoning benchmarks MathVision and VisualPuzzles show that TED consistently improves performance. On MathVision, TED raises the performance of Qwen3-VL-8B from 0.627 to 0.702, and on VisualPuzzles from 0.517 to 0.561 with just 100 training samples. Under this low-data, no-update setting, TED achieves performance competitive with fully trained parameter-based distillation while reducing training cost by over 5x, demonstrating that meaningful knowledge transfer can be achieved through contextual experience.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2603.26778

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Systems such as TED and UMEM show how episodic traces can be clustered, abstracted, and promoted into skill artifacts without modifying base-model weights.

    “Systems such as TED and UMEM show how episodic traces can be clustered, abstracted, and promoted into skill artifacts without modifying base-model weights [Yuan et al., 2026, Ye et al., 2026].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Rishabh Agarwal, Nino Vieillard, Yongchao Zhou, Piotr Stanczyk, Sabela Ramos Garea, Matthieu Geist, and Olivier Bachem. 2024. On-policy distillation of lan- guage models: Learning from self-generated mistakes. In The twelfth international conference on learning representations.
  2. Shuai Bai, Yuxuan Cai, Ruizhe Chen, Keqin Chen, Xionghui Chen, Zesen Cheng, Lianghao Deng, Wei Ding, Chang Gao, Chunjiang Ge, Wenbin Ge, Zhifang Guo, Qidong Huang, Jie Huang, Fei Huang, Binyuan Hui, Shutong Jiang, Zhaohai Li, Mingsheng Li, Mei Li, Kaixin Li, Zicheng Lin, Junyang Lin, Xuejing Liu, Jiawei Liu, Chenglong Liu, Yang Liu, Dayiheng Liu, Shixuan Liu, Dunjie Lu, Ruilin Luo, Chenxu Lv, Rui Men, Lingchen Meng, Xuancheng Ren, Xingzhang Ren, Sibo Song, Yuchong Sun, Jun Tang, Jianhong Tu, Jianqiang Wan, Peng Wang, Pengfei Wang, Qiuyue Wang, Yuxuan Wang, Tianbao Xie, Yiheng Xu, Haiyang Xu, Jin Xu, Zhibo Yang, Mingkun Yang, Jianxin Yang, An Yang, Bowen Yu, Fei Zhang, Hang Zhang, Xi Zhang, Bo Zheng, Humen Zhong, Jingren Zhou, Fan Zhou, Jing Zhou, Yuanzhi Zhu, and Ke Zhu. 2025. Qwen3-VL Technical Report. arXiv:2511.21631 [cs.CV] https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21631 · arXiv
  3. Amanda Bertsch, Maor Ivgi, Emily Xiao, Uri Alon, Jonathan Berant, Matthew R Gormley, and Graham Neubig. 2025. In-context learning with long-context models: An in-depth exploration. In Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 12119-12149.
  4. Max Biggs, Wei Sun, and Markus Ettl. 2021. Model distillation for revenue optimization: Interpretable personalized pricing. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 946-956.
  5. Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems 33 (2020), 1877-1901.
  6. Lin Chen, Jinsong Li, Xiaoyi Dong, Pan Zhang, Conghui He, Jiaqi Wang, Feng Zhao, and Dahua Lin. 2024. Sharegpt4v: Improving large multi-modal models with better captions. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 370- 387.
  7. Luyang Fang, Xiaowei Yu, Jiazhang Cai, Yongkai Chen, Shushan Wu, Zhengliang Liu, Zhenyuan Yang, Haoran Lu, Xilin Gong, Yufang Liu, et al. 2026. Knowledge distillation and dataset distillation of large language models: Emerging trends, challenges, and future directions. Artificial Intelligence Review 59, 1 (2026), 17.
  8. Daya Guo, Dejian Yang, Haowei Zhang, Junxiao Song, Ruoyu Zhang, Runxin Xu, Qihao Zhu, Shirong Ma, Peiyi Wang, Xiao Bi, et al. 2025. Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948 (2025). · arXiv
  9. Geoffrey Hinton, Oriol Vinyals, and Jeff Dean. 2015. Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network. Computer Science 14, 7 (2015), 38-39.
  10. Cheng-Yu Hsieh, Chun-Liang Li, Chih-Kuan Yeh, Hootan Nakhost, Yasuhisa Fujii, Alex Ratner, Ranjay Krishna, Chen-Yu Lee, and Tomas Pfister. 2023. Distilling step-by-step! outperforming larger language models with less training data and smaller model sizes. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023. 8003-8017.
  11. Devvrit Khatri, Pranamya Kulkarni, Nilesh Gupta, Yerram Varun, Liqian Peng, Jay Yagnik, Praneeth Netrapalli, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Alec Go, Inderjit S Dhillon, et al. 2025. Compressing Many-Shots in In-Context Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.16092 (2025). · arXiv
  12. Huanxuan Liao, Shizhu He, Yao Xu, Yuanzhe Zhang, Kang Liu, and Jun Zhao. 2025. Neural-symbolic collaborative distillation: Advancing small language models for complex reasoning tasks. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 39. 24567-24575.
  13. Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, and Yong Jae Lee. 2023. Visual in- struction tuning. Advances in neural information processing systems 36 (2023), 34892-34916.
  14. Jiahao Qiu, Xinzhe Juan, Yimin Wang, Ling Yang, Xuan Qi, Tongcheng Zhang, Jiacheng Guo, Yifu Lu, Zixin Yao, Hongru Wang, et al. 2025. AgentDistill: Training-Free Agent Distillation with Generalizable MCP Boxes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.14728 (2025). · arXiv
  15. Ohad Rubin, Jonathan Herzig, and Jonathan Berant. 2022. Learning to retrieve prompts for in-context learning. In Proceedings of the 2022 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies. 2655-2671.
  16. Noah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan, and Shunyu Yao. 2023. Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (2023), 8634-8652.
  17. Yueqi Song, Tianyue Ou, Yibo Kong, Zecheng Li, Graham Neubig, and Xiang Yue. 2025. Visualpuzzles: Decoupling multimodal reasoning evaluation from domain knowledge. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10342 (2025). · arXiv
  18. Kimi Team, Tongtong Bai, Yifan Bai, Yiping Bao, SH Cai, Yuan Cao, Y Charles, HS Che, Cheng Chen, Guanduo Chen, et al. 2026. Kimi K2. 5: Visual Agentic Intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.02276 (2026). · arXiv
  19. Yijun Tian, Yikun Han, Xiusi Chen, Wei Wang, and Nitesh V. Chawla. 2024. Beyond Answers: Transferring Reasoning Capabilities to Smaller LLMs Using Multi-Teacher Knowledge Distillation. arXiv:2402.04616 [cs.CL] https://arxiv. org/abs/2402.04616 · arXiv
  20. Bin Wang, Fan Wu, Xiao Han, Jiahui Peng, Huaping Zhong, Pan Zhang, Xiaoyi Dong, Weijia Li, Wei Li, Jiaqi Wang, et al. 2024. Vigc: Visual instruction generation and correction. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 38. 5309-5317.
  21. Ke Wang, Junting Pan, Weikang Shi, Zimu Lu, Houxing Ren, Aojun Zhou, Mingjie Zhan, and Hongsheng Li. 2024. Measuring multimodal mathematical reasoning with math-vision dataset. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 (2024), 95095-95169.
  22. Yizhong Wang, Yeganeh Kordi, Swaroop Mishra, Alisa Liu, Noah A. Smith, Daniel Khashabi, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2023. Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions. arXiv:2212.10560 [cs.CL] https://arxiv. org/abs/2212.10560 · arXiv
  23. Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc V Le, Denny Zhou, et al. 2022. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in neural information processing systems 35 (2022), 24824-24837.
  24. Yijia Xiao, Edward Sun, Tianyu Liu, and Wei Wang. 2024. Logicvista: Mul- timodal llm logical reasoning benchmark in visual contexts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.04973 (2024). · arXiv
  25. An Yang, Anfeng Li, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chang Gao, Chengen Huang, Chenxu Lv, et al. 2025. Qwen3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388 (2025). · arXiv
  26. Qiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, ..., and Mingxuan Wang. 2025. DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale. arXiv:2503.14476 [cs.LG] · arXiv
  27. Renrui Zhang, Dongzhi Jiang, Yichi Zhang, Haokun Lin, Ziyu Guo, Pengshuo Qiu, Aojun Zhou, Pan Lu, Kai-Wei Chang, Yu Qiao, et al. 2024. Mathverse: Does your multi-modal llm truly see the diagrams in visual math problems?. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 169-186.
  28. Huichi Zhou, Yihang Chen, Siyuan Guo, Xue Yan, Kin Hei Lee, Zihan Wang, Ka Yiu Lee, Guchun Zhang, Kun Shao, Linyi Yang, et al. 2025. Memento: Fine- tuning llm agents without fine-tuning llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.16153 (2025). · arXiv
  29. Deyao Zhu, Jun Chen, Xiaoqian Shen, Xiang Li, and Mohamed Elhoseiny. 2023. Minigpt-4: Enhancing vision-language understanding with advanced large lan- guage models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10592 (2023). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yuan, S., Wang, J., Liu, Z., Yuan, M., Peng, H., Zhao, J., Wang, B., & Wang, H.
Affiliations
  • China Telecom (China) (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7147588615
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
knowledge distillation, multimodal reasoning, in-context learning, reasoning paths, vision-language models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review