PreprintCited by 1Advanced Database Systems and QueriesData Management and AlgorithmsScientific Computing and Data Management

The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Enzyme: Incremental View Maintenance for Data Engineering

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1145/3788853.3803098

Abstract

Materialized views are a core construct in database systems, used to accelerate analytical queries and optimize batch pipelines for extract-transform-load (ETL) workflows. Maintaining view consistency as underlying data evolves is a fundamental challenge, especially in high-throughput and real-time settings. Incremental view maintenance (IVM) has been studied for decades and continues to attract significant investment from major database vendors. However, most industrial systems either offer limited SQL-operator coverage or require users to hand-tune refresh strategies. This paper presents Enzyme, an IVM engine developed at Databricks to power Spark Declarative Pipelines. It provides a built-in, end-to-end approach to incremental pipelines, utilizing materialized views as first-class building blocks. By automating refresh planning, Enzyme reduces total cost of ownership and lets users focus on business logic rather than MV mechanics. Validation across thousands of large-scale production pipelines spanning diverse application domains has demonstrated substantial computational efficiency gains, yielding a cumulative daily compute reduction of billions of CPU seconds. Built atop Apache Spark primitives, Enzyme adds a cost-based optimization layer that selects refresh strategies for collections of materialized views organized into pipelines. Enzyme's modular architecture is designed to generalize across data sources and query engines. We present key design decisions for incremental refresh planning and execution, including optimizations that exploit batching opportunities across materialized view sources. Experimental results on standard benchmarks demonstrate significant performance improvements at scale.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2603.27775

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 1

Metadata

Authors
Yadav, R., Abeysinghe, S., Yang, M., Helt, J., Ung, M., Chen, Y., Hu, M., Wei, W., Yang, Y., van Bussel, T., Chatterji, S., Roy, I., Lappas, P., Papakonstantinou, Y., Fayyaz, T., Aslam, B., Bunker, R., Armbrust, M., & Shankar, S.
Affiliations
  • Databricks (United States) (US)
  • Google (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
Pages
490-503
ISSN
0730-8078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7160401615
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
10.36
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Management and Algorithms
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
Keywords
incremental view maintenance, materialized views, view consistency, ETL pipeline, real-time data processing, database management systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review