CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorWeb visibility and informetricsDigital Marketing and Social Media

Structural Feature Engineering for Generative Engine Optimization: How Content Structure Shapes Citation Behavior

Open access
Yu, Junwei, Yang, Mufeng, Ding, Yepeng, Sato, Hiroyuki·2026·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2603.29979arXiv 2603.29979
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The proliferation of AI-powered search engines has shifted information discovery from traditional link-based retrieval to direct answer generation with selective source citation, creating new challenges for content visibility. While existing Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) approaches focus primarily on semantic content modification, the role of structural features in influencing citation behavior remains underexplored. In this paper, we propose GEO-SFE, a systematic framework for structural feature engineering in generative engine optimization. Our approach decomposes content structure into three hierarchical levels: macro-structure (document architecture), meso-structure (information chunking), and micro-structure (visual emphasis), and models their impact on citation probability across different generative engine architectures. We develop architecture-aware optimization strategies and predictive models that preserve semantic integrity while improving structural effectiveness. Experimental evaluation across six mainstream generative engines demonstrates consistent improvements in citation rate (17.3 percent) and subjective quality (18.5 percent), validating the effectiveness and generalizability of the proposed framework. This work establishes structural optimization as a foundational component of GEO, providing a data-driven methodology for enhancing content visibility in LLM-powered information ecosystems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2603.29979

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. P. Aggarwal, V. Murahari, T. Rajpurohit, A. Kalyan, K. Narasimhan, and A. Deshpande, "Geo: Generative engine optimization," in Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2024, pp. 5-16.
  2. P. Lewis, E. Perez, A. Piktus, F. Petroni, V. Karpukhin, N. Goyal, H. Küttler, M. Lewis, W.-t. Yih, T. Rocktäschel, S. Riedel, and D. Kiela, "Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks," Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 9459-9474, 2020.
  3. R. Nakano, J. Hilton, S. Balaji, J. Wu, L. Ouyang, C. Kim, C. Hesse, S. Jain, V. Rint, A. Askell, S. Kadavath, A. Jones, D. Drain, S. Anna, Z. Li, K. Tran, N. Durmus, Y. Gan, P. Christiano, and J. Leike, "Webgpt: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback," arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.09332, 2021. · arXiv
  4. R. Thoppilan, D. De Freitas, J. Hall, N. Shazeer, A. Kulshreshtha, H.-T. Cheng, A. Jin, T. Bos, L. Baker, Y. Du et al., "Lamda: Language models for dialog applications," arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.08239, 2022. · arXiv
  5. A. Kumar and H. Lakkaraju, "Manipulating large language models to increase product visibility," arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07981, 2024. · arXiv
  6. Z. Yang, D. Yang, C. Dyer, X. He, A. Smola, and E. Hovy, "Hierarchical attention networks for document classification," in Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, K. Knight, A. Nenkova, and O. Rambow, Eds. San Diego, California: Association for Computational Linguistics, June 2016, pp. 1480-1489. [Online]. Available: https://aclanthology.org/N16-1174/
  7. A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, "Attention is all you need," Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, 2017.
  8. Z. Rackauckas, "RAG-Fusion: A new take on retrieval-augmented generation," arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03367, Tech. Rep., 2024. · arXiv
  9. e. a. Xu, "Retrieval-augmented generation: A comprehensive survey of architectures, enhancements, and robustness frontiers," arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.00054, May 2025. · arXiv
  10. C. Liu, H. Chen, Y. Cai, H. Wu, Q. Ye, M.-H. Yang, and Y. Wang, "Structured attention matters to multimodal llms in document understanding," 2025, submitted on 19 Jun 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.21600 · arXiv
  11. Y. Sui, M. Zhou, M. Zhou, S. Han, and D. Zhang, "Table meets llm: Can large language models understand structured table data? a benchmark and empirical study," in Proceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 2024, pp. 645-654. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.13062 · arXiv
  12. N. F. Liu, K. Lin, J. Hewitt, A. Paranjape, M. Bevilacqua, F. Petroni, and P. Liang, "Lost in the middle: How language models use long contexts," arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03172, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.03172 · arXiv
  13. J. Chen, S. Xiao, P. Zhang, K. Luo, D. Lian, and Z. Liu, "Bge m3-embedding: Multi-lingual, multi-functionality, multi-granularity text embeddings through self-knowledge distillation," arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03216, 2024. · arXiv
  14. Y. Liu, D. Iter, Y. Xu, S. Wang, R. Xu, and C. Zhu, "G-eval: Nlg evaluation using gpt-4 with better human alignment," arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.16634, 2023. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, J., Yang, M., Ding, Y., & Sato, H.
Affiliations
National Institute of Informatics (JP)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2603.29979
arXiv
2603.29979
OpenAlex
W7147351452
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
generative engine optimization, citation behavior, content structure, visual emphasis, document structure, large language models, AI search engines, content visibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review