PreprintCited by 1Topic ModelingDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningReinforcement Learning in Robotics

A Survey of On-Policy Distillation for Large Language Models

Open access
Song, Mingyang, Zheng, Mao·2026·arXiv

Abstract

On-Policy Distillation (OPD) trains large language models with teacher guidance on student-generated trajectories, addressing the mismatch between fixed demonstrations and the histories encountered during deployment. As its use expands across language model training, different formulations of supervision and optimization make it difficult to compare methods and understand when they are effective. This survey develops a unified view of OPD through the interplay between student-generated states, teacher information, and policy updates. This framework connects the foundations of distillation with self-distillation, multi-teacher integration, reinforcement learning, and interactive agents. We examine how these settings change the supervision available to the student and relate the resulting design choices to capability transfer, training efficiency, and deployment. Our synthesis centers on the conditions under which guidance remains reliable and learnable as the student evolves, considering both immediate performance and the capacity for subsequent learning. We conclude by discussing open challenges in adapting supervision and allocating computation to support effective learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2604.00626

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No existing survey covers the four categories jointly, treats self-evaluation as a load-bearing pillar, or anchors the technical literature to an explicit autonomy/loop-closure axis.

    “Existing surveys cover single slices - on-policy distillation [12], tree-search-plus-reward methods [13] - but no survey spans the full spectrum from bounded selfrefinement to open-ended RSI.”

    From Recursive Self-Improvement in AI: From Bounded Self-Refinement to Autonomous Research Loops (2026) · cites this paper as [12]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Song, M., & Zheng, M.
Affiliations
Tencent (China) (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7148454362
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
on-policy distillation, knowledge distillation, large language models, exposure bias, self-play, teacher feedback, model compression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review