CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 0Multi-Agent Systems and NegotiationArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsPsychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience

Holos: A Web-Scale LLM-Based Multi-Agent System for the Agentic Web

Open access
Nie, Xiaohang, Guo, Zihan, Cui, Zicai, Yang, Jiachi, Chen, Zeyi, De, Leheyi, Zhang, Yu, Liao, Junwei +15 more·2026·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2604.02334arXiv 2604.02334
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

As large language models (LLM)-driven agents transition from isolated task solvers to persistent digital entities, the emergence of the Agentic Web, an ecosystem where heterogeneous agents autonomously interact and co-evolve, marks a pivotal shift toward Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). However, LLM-based multi-agent systems (LaMAS) are hindered by open-world issues such as scaling friction, coordination breakdown, and value dissipation. To address these challenges, we introduce Holos, a web-scale LaMAS architected for long-term ecological persistence. Holos adopts a five-layer architecture, with core modules primarily featuring the Nuwa engine for high-efficiency agent generation and hosting, a market-driven Orchestrator for resilient coordination, and an endogenous value cycle to achieve incentive compatibility. By bridging the gap between micro-level collaboration and macro-scale emergence, Holos hopes to lay the foundation for the next generation of the self-organizing and continuously evolving Agentic Web. We have publicly released Holos (accessible at https://holosai.io), providing a resource for the community and a testbed for future research in large-scale agentic ecosystems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2604.02334

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As collaboration chains lengthen, externalization begins to shift from private scaffolding toward shared infrastructure.

    “As collaboration chains lengthen, however, externalization begins to shift from private scaffolding toward shared infrastructure [Wang and Chen, 2025, Li et al., 2026a, Nie et al., 2026].”

    From Externalization in LLM Agents: A Unified Review of Memory, Skills, Protocols and Harness Engineering (2026) · cites this paper as Nie et al., 2026

    Section 3.5.3 (pp. 10–11) says long-horizon collaborations require intermediate artifacts to flow between agents and describes shared workspaces, artifact transfer, and persistent execution. This supports the shared-infrastructure aspect, but the paper does not describe a shift from private scaffolding to shared infrastructure as collaboration chains lengthen. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. [1][1] Peter W Battaglia, Jessica B Hamrick, Victor Bapst, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Vinicius Zambaldi, Mateusz Malinowski, Andrea Tacchetti, David Raposo, Adam Santoro, Ryan Faulkner, et al. Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.01261 , 2018. - · arXiv
  2. [2][2] D.H. Wolpert and W.G. Macready. No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation , 1(1):67-82, 1997. doi: 10.1109/4235.585893. - · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3][3] Stavros P Adam, Stamatios-Aggelos N Alexandropoulos, Panos M Pardalos, and Michael N Vrahatis. No free lunch theorem: A review. Approximation and optimization: Algorithms, complexity and applications , pages 57-82, 2019. -
  4. [4][4] Thomas W Malone and Michael S Bernstein, editors. Handbook of Collective Intelligence . MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2015. -
  5. [5][5] David Ha and Yujin Tang. Collective intelligence for deep learning: A survey of recent developments. Collective Intelligence , 1(1):26339137221114874, 2022. -
  6. [6][6] Lianmin Zheng, Jiacheng Yang, Han Cai, Ming Zhou, Weinan Zhang, Jun Wang, and Yong Yu. Magent: A many-agent reinforcement learning platform for artificial collective intelligence. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , volume 32, 2018. -
  7. [7][7] Kevin Kelly. The inevitable: Understanding the 12 technological forces that will shape our future . Penguin, 2017. -
  8. [8][8] Yingxuan Yang, Qiuying Peng, Jun Wang, Ying Wen, and Weinan Zhang. LLM-based multiagent systems: Techniques and business perspectives, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/24 11.14033 . -
  9. [10][10] Lei Wang, Chen Ma, Xueyang Feng, Zeyu Zhang, Hao Yang, Jingsen Zhang, Zhiyuan Chen, Jiakai Tang, Xu Chen, Yankai Lin, et al. A survey on large language model based autonomous agents. Frontiers of Computer Science , 18(6):186345, 2024. -
  10. [11][11] Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774 , 2023. - · arXiv
  11. [15][15] Sirui Hong, Mingchen Zhuge, Jiaqi Chen, Xiawu Zheng, Yuheng Cheng, Ceyao Zhang, Jinlin Wang, Zili Wang, Steven Ka Shing Yau, Zijuan Lin, Liyang Zhou, Chenyu Ran, Lingfeng Xiao, Chenglin Wu, and Jürgen Schmidhuber. MetaGPT: Meta programming for a multi-agent collaborative framework, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.00352 . - · arXiv
  12. [16][16] Chen Qian, Wei Liu, Hongzhang Liu, Nuo Chen, Yufan Dang, Jiahao Li, Cheng Yang, Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Xin Cong, et al. Chatdev: Communicative agents for software development. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages 15174-15186, 2024. <!-- image --> -
  13. [18][18] Qingyun Wu, Gagan Bansal, Jieyu Zhang, Yiran Wu, Beibin Li, Erkang Zhu, Li Jiang, Xiaoyun Zhang, Shaokun Zhang, Jiale Liu, Ahmed Hassan Awadallah, Ryen W White, Doug Burger, and Chi Wang. AutoGen: Enabling next-gen LLM applications via multi-agent conversation, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.08155 . - · arXiv
  14. [20][20] Chen Qian, Zihao Xie, Yifei Wang, Wei Liu, Kunlun Zhu, Hanchen Xia, Yufan Dang, Zhuoyun Du, Weize Chen, Cheng Yang, et al. Scaling large language model-based multi-agent collaboration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.07155 , 2024. - · arXiv
  15. [21][21] Yubin Kim, Ken Gu, Chanwoo Park, Chunjong Park, Samuel Schmidgall, A Ali Heydari, Yao Yan, Zhihan Zhang, Yuchen Zhuang, Mark Malhotra, et al. Towards a science of scaling agent systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.08296 , 2025. - · arXiv
  16. [22][22] David M Rothschild, Markus Mobius, Jake M Hofman, Eleanor W Dillon, Daniel G Goldstein, Nicole Immorlica, Sonia Jaffe, Brendan Lucier, Aleksandrs Slivkins, and Matthew Vogel. The agentic economy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.15799 , 2025. - · arXiv
  17. [24][24] Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Izhak Shafran, Karthik R Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. ReAct: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. In NeurIPS 2022 Foundation Models for Decision Making Workshop , 2022. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=tvI4 u1ylcqs . -
  18. [25][25] Mengying Wu, Pei Chen, Geng Hong, Aichao An, Jinsong Chen, Binwang Wan, Xudong Pan, Jiarun Dai, and Min Yang. MCPZoo: A large-scale dataset of runnable model context protocol servers for AI agent. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.15144 , 2025. - · arXiv
  19. [26][26] A. B. Kahn. Topological sorting of large networks. Commun. ACM , 5(11):558-562, November 1962. ISSN 0001-0782. doi: 10.1145/368996.369025. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/368996 .369025 . - · DOI · Paper page
  20. [27][27] Christopher JC Burges. From ranknet to lambdarank to lambdamart: An overview. Learning , 11(23-581):81, 2010. -
  21. [28][28] Shuyang Tang, Zihan Guo, Yuanjian Zhou, Chenyi Wang, Linlin You, Minjie Bian, and Weinan Zhang. An agent ecosystem with task-driven hierarchical evolving reasoners catalyzing proof of intelligence, 2025. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5789723 . -
  22. [29][29] John A Hartigan and Manchek A Wong. Algorithm AS 136: A k-means clustering algorithm. Journal of the royal statistical society. series c (applied statistics) , 28(1):100-108, 1979. -
  23. [31][31] John R Douceur. The sybil attack. In International workshop on peer-to-peer systems , pages 251-260. Springer, 2002. -
  24. [32][32] Alice Cheng and Eric Friedman. Sybilproof reputation mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Economics of peer-to-peer systems , pages 128-132, 2005. -
  25. [33][33] Joon Sung Park, Joseph O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris, Percy Liang, and Michael S Bernstein. Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior. In Proceedings of the 36th annual acm symposium on user interface software and technology , pages 1-22, 2023. <!-- image --> -
  26. [34][34] Zicai Cui, Zhouyuan Jian, Weiwen Liu, and Weinan Zhang. SoDA: An efficient interaction paradigm for the agentic web. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.22135 , 2025. - · arXiv
  27. [35][35] Michal Kosinski. Theory of mind may have spontaneously emerged in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02083 , 4:169, 2023. - · arXiv
  28. [36][36] Zhiheng Xi, Wenxiang Chen, Xin Guo, Wei He, Yiwen Ding, Boyang Hong, Ming Zhang, Junzhe Wang, Senjie Jin, Enyu Zhou, et al. The rise and potential of large language model based agents: A survey. Science China Information Sciences , 68(2):121101, 2025. -
  29. [37][37] Linyao Chen, Zimian Peng, Yingxuan Yang, Yikun Wang, Wenzheng Tom Tang, Hiroki H. Kobayashi, and Weinan Zhang. EnvX: Agentize everything with agentic AI, 2025. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2509.08088 . -
  30. [38][38] Prerna Agarwal, Himanshu Gupta, Soujanya Soni, Rohith Vallam, Renuka Sindhgatta, and Sameep Mehta. Automated creation and enrichment framework for improved invocation of enterprise APIs as tools, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.11626 . - · arXiv
  31. [39][39] Yuyang Hu, Shichun Liu, Yanwei Yue, Guibin Zhang, Boyang Liu, Fangyi Zhu, Jiahang Lin, Honglin Guo, Shihan Dou, Zhiheng Xi, Senjie Jin, Jiejun Tan, Yanbin Yin, Jiongnan Liu, Zeyu Zhang, Zhongxiang Sun, Yutao Zhu, Hao Sun, Boci Peng, Zhenrong Cheng, Xuanbo Fan, Jiaxin Guo, Xinlei Yu, Zhenhong Zhou, Zewen Hu, Jiahao Huo, Junhao Wang, Yuwei Niu, Yu Wang, Zhenfei Yin, Xiaobin Hu, Yue Liao, Qiankun Li, Kun Wang, Wangchunshu Zhou, Yixin Liu, Dawei Cheng, Qi Zhang, Tao Gui, Shirui Pan, Yan Zhang, Philip Torr, Zhicheng Dou, Ji-Rong Wen, Xuanjing Huang, Yu-Gang Jiang, and Shuicheng Yan. Memory in the age of AI agents, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13564 . - · arXiv
  32. [40][40] Runnan Fang, Yuan Liang, Xiaobin Wang, Jialong Wu, Shuofei Qiao, Pengjun Xie, Fei Huang, Huajun Chen, and Ningyu Zhang. Memp: Exploring agent procedural memory, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06433 . - · arXiv
  33. [41][41] Shengtao Zhang, Jiaqian Wang, Ruiwen Zhou, Junwei Liao, Yuchen Feng, Weinan Zhang, Ying Wen, Zhiyu Li, Feiyu Xiong, Yutao Qi, Bo Tang, and Muning Wen. MemRL: Selfevolving agents via runtime reinforcement learning on episodic memory, 2026. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2601.03192 . -
  34. [42][42] George Danezis, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Alberto Sonnino, and Alexander Spiegelman. Narwhal and Tusk: a DAG-based mempool and efficient BFT consensus. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Systems , pages 34-50, 2022. -
  35. [43][43] Qin Wang, Jiangshan Yu, Shiping Chen, and Yang Xiang. SoK: DAG-based blockchain systems. ACM Comput. Surv. , 55(12):261:1-261:38, 2023. -
  36. [45][45] Lewis Gudgeon, Pedro Moreno-Sanchez, Stefanie Roos, Patrick McCorry, and Arthur Gervais. SoK: Layer-two blockchain protocols. In FC , pages 201-226, 2020. -
  37. [46][46] Stefanie Roos, Pedro Moreno-Sanchez, Aniket Kate, and Ian Goldberg. Settling payments fast and private: Efficient decentralized routing for path-based transactions. In Proceedings of the Network and Distributed System Security Symposium , 2018. -
  38. [47][47] Peng Wang, Hong Xu, Xin Jin, and Tao Wang. Flash: Efficient dynamic routing for offchain networks. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies , pages 370-381, 2019. <!-- image --> -
  39. [48][48] Giulio Malavolta, Pedro Moreno-Sanchez, Clara Schneidewind, Aniket Kate, and Matteo Maffei. Anonymous multi-hop locks for blockchain scalability and interoperability. In Proceedings of the Network and Distributed System Security Symposium , 2019. -
  40. [49][49] Shuyang Tang and Sherman S. M. Chow. Strengthening multi-hop channels via strategic mesh connections. In Proceedings of the Financial Cryptography and Data Security Conference , 2025. -
  41. [50][50] David Evans, Vladimir Kolesnikov, and Mike Rosulek. A pragmatic introduction to secure multi-party computation. Found. Trends Priv. Secur. , 2(2-3):70-246, 2018. -
  42. [51][51] Mathias Hall-Andersen, Mark Simkin, and Benedikt Wagner. FRIDA: data availability sampling from FRI. In Proceedings of the International Cryptology Conference, Part VI , pages 289-324, 2024. -
  43. [52][52] Boshi Yuan, Shixuan Yang, Yongxiang Zhang, Ning Ding, Dawu Gu, and Shi-Feng Sun. MDML: super fast privacy-preserving machine learning for malicious security with a dishonest majority. In USENIX Security Symposium , 2024. -
  44. [53][53] Andes Y. L. Kei and Sherman S. M. Chow. SHAFT: secure, handy, accurate and fast transformer inference. In Proceedings of the Network and Distributed System Security Symposium , 2025. -
  45. [54][54] Ke Cheng, Yuheng Xia, Anxiao Song, Jiaxuan Fu, Wenjie Qu, Yulong Shen, and Jiaheng Zhang. Mosformer: Maliciously secure three-party inference framework for large transformers. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security , pages 41244138, 2025. -
  46. [55][55] Meng Hao, Hanxiao Chen, Hongwei Li, Chenkai Weng, Yuan Zhang, Haomiao Yang, and Tianwei Zhang. Scalable zero-knowledge proofs for non-linear functions in machine learning. In USENIX Security Symposium , 2024. -
  47. [56][56] Haochen Sun, Jason Li, and Hongyang Zhang. zkLLM: Zero knowledge proofs for large language models. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security , pages 4405-4419, 2024. -
  48. [57][57] Mingshu Cong, Sherman S. M. Chow, Siu-Ming Yiu, and Tsz Hon Yuen. Scalable zkSNARKs for matrix computations - A generic framework for verifiable deep learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptology and Information Security, Part V , pages 363-395, 2025. -
  49. [58][58] Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Brian Ichter, Fei Xia, Ed H. Chi, Quoc V. Le, and Denny Zhou. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , NIPS '22, Red Hook, NY, USA, 2022. Curran Associates Inc. ISBN 9781713871088. -
  50. [59][59] Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu, Maria Lomeli, Eric Hambro, Luke Zettlemoyer, Nicola Cancedda, and Thomas Scialom. Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 36:6853968551, 2023. -
  51. [60][60] Shishir G Patil, Tianjun Zhang, Xin Wang, and Joseph E Gonzalez. Gorilla: Large language model connected with massive apis. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 37: 126544-126565, 2024. -
  52. [61][61] Yongliang Shen, Kaitao Song, Xu Tan, Dongsheng Li, Weiming Lu, and Yueting Zhuang. Hugginggpt: Solving ai tasks with chatgpt and its friends in hugging face. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 36:38154-38180, 2023. -
  53. [62][62] Yujia Qin, Shihao Liang, Yining Ye, Kunlun Zhu, Lan Yan, Yaxi Lu, Yankai Lin, Xin Cong, Xiangru Tang, Bill Qian, et al. ToolLLM: Facilitating large language models to master 16000+ real-world APIs. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations , 2024. <!-- image --> -
  54. [64][64] Noah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan, and Shunyu Yao. Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 36:8634-8652, 2023. -
  55. [65][65] Guanzhi Wang, Yuqi Xie, Yunfan Jiang, Ajay Mandlekar, Chaowei Xiao, Yuke Zhu, Linxi Fan, and Anima Anandkumar. Voyager: An open-ended embodied agent with large language models. Transactions on Machine Learning Research , 2024. -
  56. [66][66] Noah Wang, Zy Peng, Haoran Que, Jiaheng Liu, Wangchunshu Zhou, Yuhan Wu, Hongcheng Guo, Ruitong Gan, Zehao Ni, Jian Yang, et al. Rolellm: Benchmarking, eliciting, and enhancing role-playing abilities of large language models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024 , pages 14743-14777, 2024. -
  57. [67][67] Guohao Li, Hasan Hammoud, Hani Itani, Dmitrii Khizbullin, and Bernard Ghanem. Camel: Communicative agents for" mind" exploration of large language model society. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 36:51991-52008, 2023. -
  58. [68][68] Juan A Wibowo and George C Polyzos. Toward a safe internet of agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.00520 , 2025. - · arXiv
  59. [85][85] Shunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran, Thomas L. Griffiths, Yuan Cao, and Karthik Narasimhan. Tree of thoughts: deliberate problem solving with large language models. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , NIPS '23, Red Hook, NY, USA, 2023. Curran Associates Inc. -
  60. [86][86] Lutfi Eren Erdogan, Hiroki Furuta, Sehoon Kim, Nicholas Lee, Suhong Moon, Gopala Anumanchipalli, Kurt Keutzer, and Amir Gholami. Plan-and-Act: Improving planning of agents for long-horizon tasks. In Forty-second International Conference on Machine Learning , 2025. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=ybA4EcMmUZ . -
  61. [88][88] Siddharth Nayak, Adelmo Morrison Orozco, Marina Ten Have, Vittal Thirumalai, Jackson Zhang, Darren Chen, Aditya Kapoor, Eric Robinson, Karthik Gopalakrishnan, James Harrison, et al. LLaMAR: Long-horizon planning for multi-agent robots in partially observable environments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.10031 , 2024. - · arXiv
  62. [90][90] Yingxuan Yang, Huacan Chai, Yuanyi Song, Siyuan Qi, Muning Wen, Ning Li, Junwei Liao, Haoyi Hu, Jianghao Lin, Gaowei Chang, Weiwen Liu, Ying Wen, Yong Yu, and Weinan Zhang. A survey of AI agent protocols, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.16736 . - · arXiv
  63. [91][91] Yu Wang and Xi Chen. Mirix: Multi-agent memory system for llm-based agents, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.07957 . - · arXiv
  64. [92][92] Kai Mei, Xi Zhu, Wujiang Xu, Wenyue Hua, Mingyu Jin, Zelong Li, Shuyuan Xu, Ruosong Ye, Yingqiang Ge, and Yongfeng Zhang. Aios: Llm agent operating system. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.16971 , 2024. <!-- image --> - · arXiv
  65. [93][93] Sara Hooker. The hardware lottery. Communications of the ACM , 64(12):58-65, 2021. -
  66. [94][94] Gamal Refai-Ahmed, Mallik Tatipamula, Victor Zhirnov, Ahmed Refaey Hussein, and Abdallah Shami. When intelligence overloads infrastructure: A forecast model for ai-driven bottlenecks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.07265 , 2025. - · arXiv
  67. [95][95] Yingxuan Yang, Ying Wen, Jun Wang, and Weinan Zhang. Agent exchange: Shaping the future of ai agent economics, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.03904 . - · arXiv
  68. [98][98] Botao'Amber' Hu and Bangdao Chen. Insured agents: A decentralized trust insurance mechanism for agentic economy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.08737 , 2025. - · arXiv
  69. [99][99] Zihan Guo, Yuanjian Zhou, Chenyi Wang, Linlin You, Minjie Bian, and Weinan Zhang. BetaWeb: Towards a blockchain-enabled trustworthy agentic web. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.13787 , 2025. · arXiv

Authors
Nie, X., Guo, Z., Cui, Z., Yang, J., Chen, Z., De, L., Zhang, Y., Liao, J., Huang, B., Yang, Y., Han, Z., Peng, Z., Chen, L., Tang, W. T., Liu, Z., Zhou, T., Hu, B. A., Tang, S., Lin, J., Liu, W., Wen, M., Zhou, Y., & Zhang, W.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2604.02334
arXiv
2604.02334
OpenAlex
W7150966194
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
Keywords
multi-agent LLM systems, agent coordination, incentive compatibility, artificial general intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review