CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 67Advanced Software Engineering MethodologiesArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsSoftware Engineering Techniques and Practices

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dive into Claude Code: The Design Space of Today's and Future AI Agent Systems

Open access
Liu, Jiacheng, Zhao, Xiaohan, Shang, Xinyi, Shen, Zhiqiang·2026·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2604.14228arXiv 2604.14228
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Claude Code is an agentic coding tool that can run shell commands, edit files, and call external services on behalf of the user. This study describes its architecture by analyzing the publicly available source code and comparing it with two independent open-source AI agent systems, OpenClaw and Hermes Agent, that answer many of similar or even the same design questions. Our analysis identifies five human values, philosophies, and needs that motivate the architecture: human decision authority, safety, security, and privacy, reliable execution, capability amplification, and contextual adaptability. We then trace them through thirteen design principles to implementation choices. The core of the system is a simple while-loop that calls the model, runs tools, and repeats. Most of the code, however, lives in the systems around this loop: a permission system with seven modes and an ML-based classifier, a five-layer compaction pipeline for context management, four extensibility mechanisms (MCP, plugins, skills, and hooks), a subagent delegation and orchestration mechanism, and append-oriented session storage. Comparisons with OpenClaw and Hermes Agent show that the same design questions produce different answers across three deployment contexts. Claude Code emphasizes per-action safety, OpenClaw emphasizes perimeter-level access, and Hermes renders per-action approvals across many surfaces. At the runtime layer, Claude Code uses a single CLI loop, OpenClaw embeds the runtime within a…

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2604.14228

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 89

  1. Michael Ahn, Anthony Brohan, Noah Brown, Yevgen Chebotar, Omar Cortes, Byron David, Chelsea Finn, Chuyuan Fu, Keerthana Gopalakrishnan, Karol Hausman, et al. Do as i can, not as i say: Grounding language in robotic affordances. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.01691 , 2022. · arXiv
  2. Aizierjiang Aiersilan. The vibe-check protocol: Quantifying cognitive offloading in ai programming. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.02410 , 2026. · arXiv
  3. Joel Becker, Nate Rush, Elizabeth Barnes, and David Rein. Measuring the impact of early-2025 ai on experienced open-source developer productivity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.09089 , 2025. · arXiv
  4. Joeran Beel, Min-Yen Kan, and Moritz Baumgart. Evaluating sakana's ai scientist: Bold claims, mixed results, and a promising future? In ACM SIGIR Forum , volume 59, pages 1-20. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2025.
  5. Yoshua Bengio, Stephen Clare, Carina Prunkl, Maksym Andriushchenko, Ben Bucknall, Malcolm Murray, Rishi Bommasani, Stephen Casper, Tom Davidson, Raymond Douglas, et al. International ai safety report 2026. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.21012 , 2026. · arXiv
  6. Piercosma Bisconti, Matteo Prandi, Federico Pierucci, Federico Sartore, Enrico Panai, Laura Caroli, Yue Zhu, Adam Leon Smith, Luca Nannini, Marcello Galisai, et al. Boiling the frog: A multi-turn benchmark for agentic safety. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.22643 , 2026. · arXiv
  7. Johan Bjorck, Fernando Castañeda, Nikita Cherniadev, Xingye Da, Runyu Ding, Linxi Fan, Yu Fang, Dieter Fox, Fengyuan Hu, Spencer Huang, et al. Gr00t n1: An open foundation model for generalist humanoid robots. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14734 , 2025. · arXiv
  8. Kevin Black, Noah Brown, Danny Driess, Adnan Esmail, Michael Equi, Chelsea Finn, Niccolo Fusai, Lachy Groom, Karol Hausman, Brian Ichter, et al. π 0 : A vision-language-action flow model for general robot control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24164 , 2024. · arXiv
  9. Anthony Brohan, Noah Brown, Justice Carbajal, Yevgen Chebotar, Xi Chen, Krzysztof Choromanski, Tianli Ding, Danny Driess, Avinava Dubey, Chelsea Finn, et al. Rt-2: Vision-language-action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.15818 , 2023. · arXiv
  10. Yuandao Cai, Yuzhang Zhu, Liyou Gao, Wensheng Tang, and Shengchao Qin. Push your agent: Measuring and enforcing quantitative goal persistence in long-horizon LLM agents. 2026. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23574 . · arXiv
  11. Mert Cemri, Melissa Z Pan, Shuyi Yang, Lakshya A Agrawal, Bhavya Chopra, Rishabh Tiwari, Kurt Keutzer, Aditya Parameswaran, Dan Klein, Kannan Ramchandran, et al. Why do multi-agent llm systems fail? arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.13657 , 2025. · arXiv
  12. Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, Qiming Yuan, Henrique Ponde De Oliveira Pinto, Jared Kaplan, Harri Edwards, Yuri Burda, Nicholas Joseph, Greg Brockman, et al. Evaluating large language models trained on code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374 , 2021. · arXiv
  13. Valerie Chen, Alan Zhu, Sebastian Zhao, Hussein Mozannar, David Sontag, and Ameet Talwalkar. Need help? designing proactive ai assistants for programming. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages 1-18, 2025.
  14. Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Jingwei Zuo, Cheng Yang, Chenfei Yuan, Chi-Min Chan, Heyang Yu, Yaxi Lu, Yi-Hsin Hung, Chen Qian, et al. Agentverse: Facilitating multi-agent collaboration and exploring emergent behaviors. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations , 2023.
  15. Xuanze Chen, Xukang Xie, Wentao Fu, Jiajun Zhou, Shanqing Yu, and Qi Xuan. Memsecbench: Tracking agent memory poisoning from persistence to consequence and repair. arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.27080 , 2026. · arXiv
  16. Prateek Chhikara, Dev Khant, Saket Aryan, Taranjeet Singh, and Deshraj Yadav. Mem0: Building production-ready ai agents with scalable long-term memory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19413 , 2025. · arXiv
  17. Musa Cim, Burak Topcu, Chita Das, and Mahmut Taylan Kandemir. Parallel context compaction for long-horizon llm agent serving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.23296 , 2026. · arXiv
  18. Yang Deng, Lizi Liao, Wenqiang Lei, Grace Hui Yang, Wai Lam, and Tat-Seng Chua. Proactive conversational ai: A comprehensive survey of advancements and opportunities. ACM Transactions on Information Systems , 43(3):1-45, 2025.
  19. Shuangrui Ding, Xuanlang Dai, Long Xing, Shengyuan Ding, Ziyu Liu, Yang JingYi, Penghui Yang, Zhixiong Zhang, Xilin Wei, Xinyu Fang, et al. Wildclawbench: A benchmark for real-world, long-horizon agent evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.10912 , 2026. · arXiv
  20. Yilun Du, Shuang Li, Antonio Torralba, Joshua B Tenenbaum, and Igor Mordatch. Improving factuality and reasoning in language models through multiagent debate. In Forty-first international conference on machine learning , 2024.
  21. Yuetian Du, Yucheng Wang, He Xu, Jiexu Xu, Shanwen Tan, Bing Zhao, Boyu Yang, Zhijie Xu, Ming Kong, Hu Wei, et al. Living-harness is an interactive-agent evolver. arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.26598 , 2026. · arXiv
  22. Yuyuan Feng, Zhishang Xiang, Chaobin Yang, Qichao Ma, Zerui Chen, Yujing Zhang, Ke Huang, Chuanjie Wu, Zhaoxu Liu, Yili Wang, et al. Graph engineering in the era of llm agents: From individual intelligence to system intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.21156 , 2026. · arXiv
  23. Juraj Gottweis, Wei-Hung Weng, Alexander Daryin, Tao Tu, Anil Palepu, Petar Sirkovic, Artiom Myaskovsky, Felix Weissenberger, Keran Rong, Ryutaro Tanno, et al. Towards an ai co-scientist. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18864 , 2025. · arXiv
  24. Hao He, Courtney Miller, Shyam Agarwal, Christian Kästner, and Bogdan Vasilescu. Speed at the cost of quality: How cursor ai increases short-term velocity and long-term complexity in open-source projects. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.04427 , 2025. · arXiv
  25. Zeyu He, Hannah Kim, Dan Zhang, and Estevam Hruschka. How to steer your multi-agent system: Human-llm collaborative planning. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on AI and Agentic Systems , pages 330-347, 2026.
  26. Deyao Hong, Yizhe Chi, Wenyi Li, Xiaoqiu Wang, Mingju Gao, Kaisen Yang, Bingxiang He, Youjie Zheng, Calvin Xiao, and Qinhuai Na. Swe refactor bench: Can coding agents complete a long-horizon, whole-repository stack migration? arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.23564 , 2026. · arXiv
  27. Sirui Hong, Mingchen Zhuge, Jonathan Chen, Xiawu Zheng, Yuheng Cheng, Jinlin Wang, Ceyao Zhang, Zili Wang, Steven Ka Shing Yau, Zijuan Lin, et al. Metagpt: Meta programming for a multi-agent collaborative framework. In The twelfth international conference on learning representations , 2023.
  28. Xinyi Hou, Yanjie Zhao, Shenao Wang, and Haoyu Wang. Model context protocol (mcp): Landscape, security threats, and future research directions. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology , 2025.
  29. Shengran Hu, Cong Lu, and Jeff Clune. Automated design of agentic systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.08435 , 2024. · arXiv
  30. Yuyang Hu, Shichun Liu, Yanwei Yue, Guibin Zhang, Boyang Liu, Fangyi Zhu, Jiahang Lin, Honglin Guo, Shihan Dou, Zhiheng Xi, et al. Memory in the age of ai agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.13564 , 2025. · arXiv
  31. Wei-Chieh Huang, Weizhi Zhang, Yueqing Liang, Yuanchen Bei, Yankai Chen, Tao Feng, Xinyu Pan, Zhen Tan, Yu Wang, Tianxin Wei, et al. Rethinking memory mechanisms of foundation agents in the second half. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.06052 , 2026. · arXiv
  32. Carlos E Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao, Kexin Pei, Ofir Press, and Karthik Narasimhan. Swe-bench: Can language models resolve real-world github issues? arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06770 , 2023. · arXiv
  33. Sayash Kapoor, Benedikt Stroebl, Zachary S Siegel, Nitya Nadgir, and Arvind Narayanan. Ai agents that matter. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.01502 , 2024. · arXiv
  34. Sajjad Khan. Resume means resume: A machine-checked conformance contract for checkpoint, interrupt, and resume semantics in workflow persistence layers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.03836 , 2026. · arXiv
  35. Omar Khattab, Arnav Singhvi, Paridhi Maheshwari, Zhiyuan Zhang, Keshav Santhanam, Sri Vardhamanan, Saiful Haq, Ashutosh Sharma, Thomas T Joshi, Hanna Moazam, et al. Dspy: Compiling declarative language model calls into self-improving pipelines. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03714 , 2023. · arXiv
  36. Nataliya Kosmyna, Eugene Hauptmann, Ye Tong Yuan, Jessica Situ, Xian-Hao Liao, Ashly Vivian Beresnitzky, Iris Braunstein, and Pattie Maes. Your brain on chatgpt: Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an ai assistant for essay writing task. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.08872 , 4, 2025. · arXiv
  37. Arseny Kravchenko, Vadim Liventsev, Innokentii Konstantinov, Ildar Iskhakov, and Matvey Kukuy. Appa: Recoverable information-flow control for real-world llm agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.24625 , 2026. · arXiv
  38. Chenqian Le, Jiayi Cheng, Qijia He, Runhao Li, Yinghao Li, and Xupeng Chen. What does multi-harness rl learn? credit assignment and portability in coding agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2609.04518 , 2026. · arXiv
  39. Geonsun Lee, Min Xia, Nels Numan, Xun Qian, David Li, Yanhe Chen, Achin Kulshrestha, Ishan Chatterjee, Yinda Zhang, Dinesh Manocha, et al. Sensible agent: A framework for unobtrusive interaction with proactive ar agents. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology , pages 1-22, 2025.
  40. Guohao Li, Hasan Hammoud, Hani Itani, Dmitrii Khizbullin, and Bernard Ghanem. Camel: Communicative agents for" mind" exploration of large language model society. Advances in neural information processing systems , 36: 51991-52008, 2023.
  41. Han Li, Zhemin Fang, Rili Feng, Yingqi Zhao, Jiaheng Liu, Pengfei Gao, He Ye, Dayi Lin, Qingwei Lin, Saravan Rajmohan, et al. Loopsbench: From harness engineering to loop engineering in coding agent evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.00267 , 2026. · arXiv
  42. Tian Liang, Zhiwei He, Wenxiang Jiao, Xing Wang, Yan Wang, Rui Wang, Yujiu Yang, Shuming Shi, and Zhaopeng Tu. Encouraging divergent thinking in large language models through multi-agent debate. In Proceedings of the 2024 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing , pages 17889-17904, 2024.
  43. Xingyu Bruce Liu, Shitao Fang, Weiyan Shi, Chien-Sheng Wu, Takeo Igarashi, and Xiang'Anthony' Chen. Proactive conversational agents with inner thoughts. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages 1-19, 2025.
  44. Yue Liu, Ratnadira Widyasari, Yanjie Zhao, Ivana Clairine Irsan, and David Lo. Debt behind the ai boom: A large-scale empirical study of ai-generated code in the wild. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.28592 , 2026. · arXiv
  45. Chris Lu, Cong Lu, Robert Tjarko Lange, Jakob Foerster, Jeff Clune, and David Ha. The ai scientist: Towards fully automated open-ended scientific discovery. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06292 , 2024. · arXiv
  46. Aman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan, Luyu Gao, Sarah Wiegreffe, Uri Alon, Nouha Dziri, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Yiming Yang, et al. Self-refine: Iterative refinement with self-feedback. Advances in neural information processing systems , 36:46534-46594, 2023.
  47. Miles McCain, Thomas Millar, Saffron Huang, Jake Eaton, Kunal Handa, Michael Stern, Alex Tamkin, Matt Kearney, Esin Durmus, Judy Shen, Jerry Hong, Brian Calvert, Jun Shern Chan, Francesco Mosconi, David Saunders, Tyler Neylon, Gabriel Nicholas, Sarah Pollack, Jack Clark, and Deep Ganguli. Measuring AI agent autonomy in practice. Anthropic Research Blog, https://anthropic.com/research/measuring-agent-autonomy , 2026.
  48. Ethan Mollick. Co-intelligence: Living and working with AI . Penguin, 2024.
  49. Luca Nannini, Adam Leon Smith, Michele Joshua Maggini, Enrico Panai, Sandra Feliciano, Aleksandr Tiulkanov, Elena Maran, James Gealy, and Piercosma Bisconti. Ai agents under eu law. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.04604 , 2026. · arXiv
  50. Xuying Ning, Katherine Tieu, Dongqi Fu, Tianxin Wei, Zihao Li, Yuanchen Bei, Jiaru Zou, Mengting Ai, Zhining Liu, Ting-Wei Li, et al. Code as agent harness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.18747 , 2026. · arXiv
  51. Kai Pan. Agent-first tool api: A semantic interface paradigm for enterprise ai agent systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.10555 , 2026. · arXiv
  52. Gil Pasternak, Dheeraj Rajagopal, Julia White, Dhruv Atreja, Matthew Thomas, George Hurn-Maloney, and Ash Lewis. Beyond reactivity: Measuring proactive problem solving in llm agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.19771 , 2025. · arXiv
  53. Divya Pathak, Harshit Kumar, Anuska Roy, Felix George, Mudit Verma, and Pratibha Moogi. Detecting silent failures in multi-agentic ai trajectories. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.04032 , 2025. · arXiv
  54. Kevin Pu, Daniel Lazaro, Ian Arawjo, Haijun Xia, Ziang Xiao, Tovi Grossman, and Yan Chen. Assistance or disruption? exploring and evaluating the design and trade-offs of proactive ai programming support. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems , pages 1-21, 2025.
  55. Chen Qian, Wei Liu, Hongzhang Liu, Nuo Chen, Yufan Dang, Jiahao Li, Cheng Yang, Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Xin Cong, et al. Chatdev: Communicative agents for software development. In Proceedings of the 62nd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (volume 1: Long papers) , pages 15174-15186, 2024.
  56. Gwendolyn Rak. How to stay ahead of AI as an early-career engineer. IEEE Spectrum , 2025. https://spectrum.ieee. org/ai-effect-entry-level-jobs .
  57. Charles Reis and Steven D Gribble. Isolating web programs in modern browser architectures. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM European conference on Computer systems , pages 219-232, 2009. ruvnet. Open claude code. https://github.com/ruvnet/open-claude-code , 2026. Accessed May 2026.
  58. Ravi S Sandhu, Edward J Coyne, Hal L Feinstein, and Charles E Youman. Role-based access control models. Computer , 29(2):38-47, 2002.
  59. Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu, Maria Lomeli, Eric Hambro, Luke Zettlemoyer, Nicola Cancedda, and Thomas Scialom. Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools. Advances in neural information processing systems , 36:68539-68551, 2023.
  60. Judy Hanwen Shen and Alex Tamkin. How ai impacts skill formation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.20245 , 2026. · arXiv
  61. Noah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan, and Shunyu Yao. Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning. Advances in neural information processing systems , 36:8634-8652, 2023.
  62. Leon Staufer, Kevin Feng, Kevin Wei, Luke Bailey, Yawen Duan, Mick Yang, A Pinar Ozisik, Stephen Casper, and Noam Kolt. The 2025 ai agent index: Documenting technical and safety features of deployed agentic ai systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.17753 , 2026. · arXiv
  63. Viktoria Stray, Elias Goldmann Brandtzæg, Viggo Tellefsen Wivestad, Astri Barbala, and Nils Brede Moe. Developer productivity with and without github copilot: A longitudinal mixed-methods case study. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.20353 , 2025. · arXiv
  64. Yifan Sui, Han Zhao, Rui Ma, Zhiyuan He, Hao Wang, Jianxun Li, and Yuqing Yang. Act while thinking: Accelerating llm agents via pattern-aware speculative tool execution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.18897 , 2026. · arXiv
  65. Weiwei Sun, Xuhui Zhou, Weihua Du, Xingyao Wang, Sean Welleck, Graham Neubig, Maarten Sap, and Yiming Yang. Training proactive and personalized llm agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.02208 , 2025. · arXiv
  66. The Linux Foundation. Linux foundation announces the formation of the agentic AI foundation (AAIF), anchored by new project contributions including model context protocol (MCP), goose and AGENTS.md. Linux Foundation Press Release, 2025. https://www.linuxfoundation.org/press/ linux-foundation-announces-the-formation-of-the-agentic-ai-foundation .
  67. Priyansh Trivedi and Olivier Schmitt. Does code cleanliness affect coding agents? a controlled minimal-pair study. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.20049 , 2026. ultraworkers. Claw code. https://github.com/ultraworkers/claw-code , 2026. Accessed May 2026. · arXiv
  68. Guanzhi Wang, Yuqi Xie, Yunfan Jiang, Ajay Mandlekar, Chaowei Xiao, Yuke Zhu, Linxi Fan, and Anima Anandkumar. Voyager: An open-ended embodied agent with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16291 , 2023. · arXiv
  69. Lei Wang, Chen Ma, Xueyang Feng, Zeyu Zhang, Hao Yang, Jingsen Zhang, Zhiyuan Chen, Jiakai Tang, Xu Chen, Yankai Lin, et al. A survey on large language model based autonomous agents. Frontiers of Computer Science , 18 (6):186345, 2024a.
  70. Xingyao Wang, Boxuan Li, Yufan Song, Frank F Xu, Xiangru Tang, Mingchen Zhuge, Jiayi Pan, Yueqi Song, Bowen Li, Jaskirat Singh, et al. Openhands: An open platform for ai software developers as generalist agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.16741 , 2024b. · arXiv
  71. Yi Wang, Haopeng Zhang, Chengxiang Huang, Rui Dai, Kaikui Liu, Piotr Koniusz, and Xiangxiang Chu. Looparena: Benchmarking models as runtime controllers for loop engineering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.28281 , 2026a. · arXiv
  72. Yike Wang, Huaisheng Zhu, Zhengyu Hu, Yige Yuan, Zhengyu Chen, Shakti Senthil, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Yulia Tsvetkov, Pradeep Dasigi, and Teng Xiao. Rethinking the evaluation of harness evolution for agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.12227 , 2026b. · arXiv
  73. Zora Zhiruo Wang, Jiayuan Mao, Daniel Fried, and Graham Neubig. Agent workflow memory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.07429 , 2024c. · arXiv
  74. Michael Wooldridge. An introduction to multiagent systems . John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
  75. Qingyun Wu, Gagan Bansal, Jieyu Zhang, Yiran Wu, Beibin Li, Erkang Zhu, Li Jiang, Xiaoyun Zhang, Shaokun Zhang, Jiale Liu, et al. Autogen: Enabling next-gen llm applications via multi-agent conversations. In First conference on language modeling , 2024.
  76. Qing Xiao, Xinlan Emily Hu, Mark E Whiting, Arvind Karunakaran, Hong Shen, and Hancheng Cao. Ai hasn't fixed teamwork, but it shifted collaborative culture: A longitudinal study in a project-based software development organization (2023-2025). arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.10956 , 2025. · arXiv
  77. Bin Xu. Ai agent systems: Architectures, applications, and evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.01743 , 2026. · arXiv
  78. Wujiang Xu, Yu Wang, Kai Mei, Kaiqu Liang, Zhenting Wang, Mingyu Jin, Han Zhang, Shi-Xiong Zhang, Wenyue Hua, Sambit Sahu, et al. Memgym: a long-horizon memory environment for llm agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.20833 , 2026. · arXiv
  79. Chen Yang, Jiashuo Tian, Ziqi Wang, Xinyin Liu, Meiru Ye, and Junjie Chen. Learning globally reusable skills for coding agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.06153 , 2026a. · arXiv
  80. Chenyang Yang, Xinran Zhao, Tongshuang Wu, and Christian Kästner. Better harnesses, smaller models: Building 90% cheaper agents via automated harness adaptation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.08938 , 2026b. · arXiv
  81. John Yang, Carlos E Jimenez, Alexander Wettig, Kilian Lieret, Shunyu Yao, Karthik Narasimhan, and Ofir Press. Swe-agent: Agent-computer interfaces enable automated software engineering. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 37:50528-50652, 2024.
  82. Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik R Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. In The eleventh international conference on learning representations , 2022.
  83. Shunyu Yao, Noah Shinn, Pedram Razavi, and Karthik Narasimhan. τ -bench: A benchmark for tool-agent-user interaction in real-world domains. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.12045 , 2024. · arXiv
  84. Zhou Yu, Bin Bi, Shiva Kumar Pentyala, Shubham Mehrotra, Sougata Chaudhuri, Shilpa Bhagavath, Zeyuan Chen, Ran Xu, Phil Mui, James Zhu, et al. Co-evolving harnesses and models: On-policy correction helps weaker models catch up where imitation fails. arXiv preprint arXiv:2609.09134 , 2026. · arXiv
  85. Qizheng Zhang, Changran Hu, Shubhangi Upasani, Boyuan Ma, Fenglu Hong, Vamsidhar Kamanuru, Jay Rainton, Chen Wu, Mengmeng Ji, Hanchen Li, et al. Agentic context engineering: Evolving contexts for self-improving language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.04618 , 2025a. · arXiv
  86. Zeyu Zhang, Quanyu Dai, Xiaohe Bo, Chen Ma, Rui Li, Xu Chen, Jieming Zhu, Zhenhua Dong, and Ji-Rong Wen. A survey on the memory mechanism of large language model-based agents. ACM Transactions on Information Systems , 43(6):1-47, 2025b.
  87. Andy Zhou, Kai Yan, Michal Shlapentokh-Rothman, Haohan Wang, and Yu-Xiong Wang. Language agent tree search unifies reasoning acting and planning in language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.04406 , 2023. · arXiv
  88. Hao Zhou, Haichuan Hu, Tianyu Luo, Ye Shang, Chunrong Fang, Zhenyu Chen, Liang Xiao, and Quanjun Zhang. Self-evolving coding agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.03392 , 2026. · arXiv
  89. Mingchen Zhuge, Wenyi Wang, Louis Kirsch, Francesco Faccio, Dmitrii Khizbullin, and Jürgen Schmidhuber. Gptswarm: Language agents as optimizable graphs. In Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning , 2024.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 67

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Liu, J., Zhao, X., Shang, X., & Shen, Z.
Affiliations
Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence (AE)
ORCID
Shang, Xinyi
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2604.14228
arXiv
2604.14228
OpenAlex
W7154745240
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Keywords
Claude Code, agent architecture, OpenClaw, privacy, contextual adaptability, permission system

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dive into Claude Code: The Design Space of Today's and Future AI Agent Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2604.14228
The paper
Liu, J., Zhao, X., Shang, X., & Shen, Z. (2026). Dive into Claude Code: The Design Space of Today's and Future AI Agent Systems. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2604.14228