PreprintCited by 1Artificial Intelligence ApplicationsAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningScientific Computing and Data Management

EvoMaster: A Foundational Evolving Agent Framework for Agentic Science at Scale

Open access
Zhu, Xinyu, Cai, Yuzhu, Liu, Zexi, Wang, Cheng, Li, Fengyang, Jin, Wenkai, Liu, Wanxu, Bing, Zehao +15 more·2026·arXiv

Abstract

The convergence of large language models and agents is catalyzing a new era of scientific discovery: Agentic Science. However, common agent infrastructure is repeatedly rebuilt across scientific fields (loop fragmentation) and useful evidence and experience are lost in long-horizon research (loop discontinuity), bringing obstacles to Agentic Science at Scale. We introduce EvoMaster, a foundational evolving agent framework for Agentic Science at Scale. EvoMaster handles loop fragmentation and loop discontinuity by implementing Loop Research in which external evidence persists and improves later decisions. Through three nested loops, Execution, Exploration and Evolution (E$^3$), loop research connects research within runs, across experiments and across studies. Across ten benchmarks spanning scientific research, coding and reasoning, EvoMaster achieves the best score among four agents using GPT-5.4, reaching a mean score of 58.02%, and outperforms the strongest competing agent Codex(40.29%) while costing 35.6% less. These results show that a shared loop-research foundation can support diverse scientific agents at scale.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2604.17406

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The AI-scientist theme has fragmented into dozens of domain-specific descendants.

    “the theme has since fragmented into dozens of domain-specific descendants”

    From Recursive Self-Improvement in AI: From Bounded Self-Refinement to Autonomous Research Loops (2026) · cites this paper as [175]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, X., Cai, Y., Liu, Z., Wang, C., Li, F., Jin, W., Liu, W., Bing, Z., Zheng, B., Chai, J., Tang, S., Ye, R., Du, Y., Pang, X., Du, Y., Miao, T., Zhang, Y., Liao, R., Ding, Z., Zhang, L., Wang, Y., E, W., & Chen, S.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7155070469
Cited by
0
References
1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
Keywords
nested loops, large language models, scientific discovery, coding agents, reasoning agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review