PreprintCited by 1Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorTopic ModelingAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
OBLIQ-Bench: Exposing Overlooked Bottlenecks in Modern Retrievers with Latent and Implicit Queries
Open accessTchuindjo, Diane, Shah, Devavrat, Khattab, Omar·2026·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2605.06235arXiv 2605.06235
Abstract
Retrieval benchmarks are increasingly saturating, but we argue that efficient search is far from a solved problem. We identify a class of queries we call oblique, which seek documents that instantiate a latent pattern, like finding all tweets that express an implicit stance, chat logs that demonstrate a particular failure mode, or transcripts that match an abstract scenario. We study three mechanisms through which obliqueness may arise and introduce OBLIQ-Bench, a suite of five oblique search problems over real long-tail corpora. OBLIQ-Bench exposes an overlooked asymmetry between retrieval and verification, where reasoning LLMs reliably recognize latent relevance whenever relevant documents are surfaced, but even sophisticated retrieval pipelines fail to surface most relevant documents in the first place. We hope that OBLIQ-Bench will drive research into retrieval architectures that efficiently capture latent patterns and implicit signals in large corpora.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2605.06235
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Useful heuristics are not necessarily semantically similar to the current step; retrieving them is an oblique retrieval problem, in which relevance is latent rather than expressed in the text.
“A plausible reason is that useful heuristics are not necessarily semantically similar to the current step: retrieving them is an oblique retrieval problem, in which relevance is latent rather than expressed in the text (Tchuindjo et al., 2026).”
From DAEDALUS: Bootstrapping Agent Memory from Self-Generated Tasks (2026) · cites this paper as Tchuindjo et al., 2026
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- Jaime Arguello, Adam Ferguson, Emery Fine, Bhaskar Mitra, Hamed Zamani, and Fernando Diaz. 2021. Tip of the Tongue Known-Item Retrieval: A Case Study in Movie Identification. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (Canberra ACT, Australia) (CHIIR '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5-14. doi:10.1145/3406522.3446021 · DOI
- Payal Bajaj, Daniel Campos, Nick Craswell, Li Deng, Jianfeng Gao, Xiaodong Liu, Rangan Ma- jumder, Andrew McNamara, Bhaskar Mitra, Tri Nguyen, et al. 2016. MS MARCO: A human generated machine reading comprehension dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.09268 (2016). · arXiv
- Timothy J. Boerner, Stephen Deems, Thomas R. Furlani, Shelley L. Knuth, and John Towns. 2023. ACCESS: Advancing Innovation: NSF's Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Coordination Ecosystem: Services & Support. In Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing (PEARC '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. doi:10.1145/3569951.3597559 · DOI
- Alexander Bondarenko, Maik Fröbe, Meriem Beloucif, Lukas Gienapp, Yamen Ajjour, Alexander Panchenko, Chris Biemann, Benno Stein, Henning Wachsmuth, Martin Potthast, et al. 2020. Overview of touché 2020: argument retrieval. In International Conference of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum for European Languages. Springer, 384-395.
- Antoine Chaffin and Raphaël Sourty. 2025. PyLate: Flexible Training and Retrieval for Late Interaction Models. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2025, Seoul, Republic of Korea, November 10-14, 2025, Meeyoung Cha, Chanyoung Park, Noseong Park, Carl Yang, Senjuti Basu Roy, Jessie Li, Jaap Kamps, Kijung Shin, Bryan Hooi, and Lifang He (Eds.). ACM, 6334-6339. doi:10.1145/3746252.3761608 · DOI
- Jonathan D. Chang, Andrew Drozdov, Shubham Toshniwal, Owen Oertell, Alexander Trott, Jacob Portes, Abhay Gupta, Pallavi Koppol, Ashutosh Baheti, Sean Kulinski, Ivan Zhou, Irene Dea, Krista Opsahl-Ong, Simon Favreau-Lessard, Sean Owen, Jose Javier Gonzalez Ortiz, Arnav Singhvi, Xabi Andrade, Cindy Wang, Kartik Sreenivasan, Sam Havens, Jialu Liu, Peyton DeNiro, Wen Sun, Michael Bendersky, and Jonathan Frankle. 2026. KARL: Knowledge Agents via Reinforcement Learning. arXiv:2603.05218 [cs.AI] https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05218 · arXiv
- Yiqun Chen, Qi Liu, Yi Zhang, Weiwei Sun, Xinyu Ma, Wei Yang, Daiting Shi, Jiaxin Mao, and Dawei Yin. 2025a. Tourrank: Utilizing large language models for documents ranking with a tournament-inspired strategy. In Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025. 1638-1652.
- Zijian Chen, Xueguang Ma, Shengyao Zhuang, Ping Nie, Kai Zou, Andrew Liu, Joshua Green, Kshama Patel, Ruoxi Meng, Mingyi Su, Sahel Sharifymoghaddam, Yanxi Li, Haoran Hong, Xinyu Shi, Xuye Liu, Nandan Thakur, Crystina Zhang, Luyu Gao, Wenhu Chen, and Jimmy Lin. 2025b. BrowseComp-Plus: A More Fair and Transparent Evaluation Benchmark of Deep-Research Agent. arXiv:2508.06600 [cs.CL] https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06600 · arXiv
- Yung-Sung Chuang, Wei Fang, Shang-Wen Li, Wen-tau Yih, and James Glass. 2023. Expand, Rerank, and Retrieve: Query Reranking for Open-Domain Question Answering. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, Anna Rogers, Jordan Boyd-Graber, and Naoaki Okazaki (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Toronto, Canada, 12131-12147. doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.768 · DOI
- Yair Feldman and Ran El-Yaniv. 2019. Multi-Hop Paragraph Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answering. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Lin- guistics, Anna Korhonen, David Traum, and Lluís Màrquez (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Florence, Italy, 2296-2309. doi:10.18653/v1/P19-1222 · DOI
- Xanh Ho, Anh-Khoa Duong Nguyen, Saku Sugawara, and Akiko Aizawa. 2020. Constructing A Multi- hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Steps. arXiv:2011.01060 [cs.CL] https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.01060 · arXiv
- Gautier Izacard, Mathilde Caron, Lucas Hosseini, Sebastian Riedel, Piotr Bojanowski, Armand Joulin, and Edouard Grave. 2022. Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learning. arXiv:2112.09118 [cs.IR] https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.09118 · arXiv
- Yichen Jiang, Shikha Bordia, Zheng Zhong, Charles Dognin, Maneesh Singh, and Mohit Bansal. 2020. HoVer: A Dataset for Many-Hop Fact Extraction And Claim Verification. In Findings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
- Vladimir Karpukhin, Barlas Oguz, Sewon Min, Patrick Lewis, Ledell Wu, Sergey Edunov, Danqi Chen, and Wen-tau Yih. 2020. Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answering. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Process- ing (EMNLP), Bonnie Webber, Trevor Cohn, Yulan He, and Yang Liu (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 6769-6781. doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.550 · DOI · Paper page
- Omar Khattab and Matei Zaharia. 2020. ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERT. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Virtual Event, China) (SIGIR '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 39-48. doi:10.1145/3397271. 3401075 · DOI · Paper page
- Julian Killingback and Hamed Zamani. 2025. Benchmarking Information Retrieval Models on Complex Retrieval Tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.07253 (2025). · arXiv
- Jinhyuk Lee, Feiyang Chen, Sahil Dua, Daniel Cer, Madhuri Shanbhogue, Iftekhar Naim, Gus- tavo Hernández Ábrego, Zhe Li, Kaifeng Chen, Henrique Schechter Vera, Xiaoqi Ren, Shanfeng Zhang, Daniel Salz, Michael Boratko, Jay Han, Blair Chen, Shuo Huang, Vikram Rao, Paul Sugan- than, Feng Han, Andreas Doumanoglou, Nithi Gupta, Fedor Moiseev, Cathy Yip, Aashi Jain, Simon Baumgartner, Shahrokh Shahi, Frank Palma Gomez, Sandeep Mariserla, Min Choi, Parashar Shah, Sonam Goenka, Ke Chen, Ye Xia, Koert Chen, Sai Meher Karthik Duddu, Yichang Chen, Trevor Walker, Wenlei Zhou, Rakesh Ghiya, Zach Gleicher, Karan Gill, Zhe Dong, Mojtaba Seyedhosseini, Yunhsuan Sung, Raphael Hoffmann, and Tom Duerig. 2025. Gemini Embedding: Generalizable Embeddings from Gemini. arXiv:2503.07891 [cs.CL] https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.07891 · arXiv
- Kevin Lin, Kyle Lo, Joseph Gonzalez, and Dan Klein. 2023. Decomposing complex queries for tip-of-the-tongue retrieval. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023. 5521-5533.
- Xinbei Ma, Yeyun Gong, Pengcheng He, Hai Zhao, and Nan Duan. 2023a. Query Rewriting in Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Houda Bouamor, Juan Pino, and Kalika Bali (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Singapore, 5303-5315. doi:10.18653/v1/ 2023.emnlp-main.322 · DOI
- Xueguang Ma, Xinyu Zhang, Ronak Pradeep, and Jimmy Lin. 2023b. Zero-shot listwise document reranking with a large language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.02156 (2023). · arXiv
- Macedo Maia, Siegfried Handschuh, André Freitas, Brian Davis, Ross McDermott, Manel Zarrouk, and Alexandra Balahur. 2018. Www'18 open challenge: financial opinion mining and question answering. In Companion proceedings of the the web conference 2018. 1941-1942.
- Jamshid Mozafari, Hamed Zamani, Guido Zuccon, and Adam Jatowt. 2026. Inferential Question Answering. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2026. 2384-2395.
- Niklas Muennighoff, Nouamane Tazi, Loic Magne, and Nils Reimers. 2023. MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmark. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Andreas Vlachos and Isabelle Augenstein (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2014-2037. doi:10.18653/v1/ 2023.eacl-main.148 · DOI · Paper page
- Yingqi Qu, Yuchen Ding, Jing Liu, Kai Liu, Ruiyang Ren, Wayne Xin Zhao, Daxiang Dong, Hua Wu, and Haifeng Wang. 2021. RocketQA: An Optimized Training Approach to Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answering. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Kristina Toutanova, Anna Rumshisky, Luke Zettlemoyer, Dilek Hakkani-Tur, Iz Belt- agy, Steven Bethard, Ryan Cotterell, Tanmoy Chakraborty, and Yichao Zhou (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 5835-5847. doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.466 · DOI
- Shauli Ravfogel, Valentina Pyatkin, Amir DN Cohen, Avshalom Manevich, and Yoav Goldberg. 2024. Description-Based Text Similarity. arXiv:2305.12517 [cs.CL] https://arxiv.org/abs/2305. 12517 · arXiv
- Stephen Robertson and Hugo Zaragoza. 2009. The Probabilistic Relevance Framework: BM25 and Beyond. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 3, 4 (April 2009), 333-389. doi:10.1561/1500000019 · DOI · Paper page
- Keshav Santhanam, Omar Khattab, Christopher Potts, and Matei Zaharia. 2022. PLAID: an efficient engine for late interaction retrieval. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 1747-1756.
- Zhengliang Shi, Shuo Zhang, Weiwei Sun, Shen Gao, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen, and Zhaochun Ren. 2024. Generate-then-Ground in Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Multi-hop Question Answering. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Lun-Wei Ku, Andre Martins, and Vivek Srikumar (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Bangkok, Thailand, 7339-7353. doi:10.18653/v1/ 2024.acl-long.397 · DOI
- Hongjin Su, Howard Yen, Mengzhou Xia, Weijia Shi, Niklas Muennighoff, Han yu Wang, Liu Haisu, Quan Shi, Zachary S Siegel, Michael Tang, Ruoxi Sun, Jinsung Yoon, Sercan O Arik, Danqi Chen, and Tao Yu. 2025. BRIGHT: A Realistic and Challenging Benchmark for Reasoning- Intensive Retrieval. In The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations. https://openreview.net/forum?id=ykuc5q381b
- Duolin Sun, Meixiu Long, Dan Yang, Junjie Wang, Yecheng Luo, Yue Shen, Jian Wang, Hualei Zhou, Chunxiao Guo, Peng Wei, Jiahai Wang, and Jinjie Gu. 2026. DIVER: A Multi-Stage Approach for Reasoning-intensive Information Retrieval. arXiv:2508.07995 [cs.IR] https: //arxiv.org/abs/2508.07995 · arXiv
- Weiwei Sun, Lingyong Yan, Xinyu Ma, Shuaiqiang Wang, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen, Dawei Yin, and Zhaochun Ren. 2023. Is ChatGPT Good at Search? Investigating Large Language Models as Re-Ranking Agents. In The 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. https://openreview.net/forum?id=3Q6LON8y2I
- Nandan Thakur, Jimmy Lin, Sam Havens, Michael Carbin, Omar Khattab, and Andrew Drozdov. 2025. FreshStack: Building Realistic Benchmarks for Evaluating Retrieval on Technical Documents. arXiv:2504.13128 [cs.IR] https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13128 · arXiv
- Nandan Thakur, Nils Reimers, Andreas Rücklé, Abhishek Srivastava, and Iryna Gurevych. 2021. BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models. arXiv:2104.08663 [cs.IR] https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.08663 · arXiv
- Harsh Trivedi, Niranjan Balasubramanian, Tushar Khot, and Ashish Sabharwal. 2022. MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Composition. arXiv:2108.00573 [cs.CL] https: //arxiv.org/abs/2108.00573 · arXiv
- Ellen M Voorhees. 2007. TREC: Continuing information retrieval's tradition of experimentation. Commun. ACM 50, 11 (2007), 51-54.
- Jason Wei, Zhiqing Sun, Spencer Papay, Scott McKinney, Jeffrey Han, Isa Fulford, Hyung Won Chung, Alex Tachard Passos, William Fedus, and Amelia Glaese. 2025. BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agents. arXiv:2504.12516 [cs.CL] https://arxiv. org/abs/2504.12516 · arXiv
- Tomer Wolfson, Harsh Trivedi, Mor Geva, Yoav Goldberg, Dan Roth, Tushar Khot, Ashish Sabharwal, and Reut Tsarfaty. 2025. MoNaCo: More Natural and Complex Questions for Reasoning Across Dozens of Documents. arXiv:2508.11133 [cs.CL] https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11133 · arXiv
- Lee Xiong, Chenyan Xiong, Ye Li, Kwok-Fung Tang, Jialin Liu, Paul Bennett, Junaid Ahmed, and Arnold Overwijk. 2020. Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrieval. arXiv:2007.00808 [cs.IR] https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.00808 · arXiv
- Zhilin Yang, Peng Qi, Saizheng Zhang, Yoshua Bengio, William Cohen, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Christopher D. Manning. 2018. HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Ellen Riloff, David Chiang, Julia Hockenmaier, and Jun'ichi Tsujii (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Brussels, Belgium, 2369-2380. doi:10.18653/v1/D18-1259 · DOI · Paper page
- Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. 2023. ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
- Yanzhao Zhang, Mingxin Li, Dingkun Long, Xin Zhang, Huan Lin, Baosong Yang, Pengjun Xie, An Yang, Dayiheng Liu, Junyang Lin, Fei Huang, and Jingren Zhou. 2025. Qwen3 Embed- ding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.05176 (2025). · arXiv
- Wenting Zhao, Xiang Ren, Jack Hessel, Claire Cardie, Yejin Choi, and Yuntian Deng. 2024. WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wild. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations. https://openreview.net/forum?id=Bl8u7ZRlbM
- Lucia Zheng, Neel Guha, Javokhir Arifov, Sarah Zhang, Michal Skreta, Christopher D. Manning, Peter Henderson, and Daniel E. Ho. 2025. A Reasoning-Focused Legal Retrieval Benchmark. In Proceedings of the 2025 Symposium on Computer Science and Law (Munich, Germany) (CSLAW '25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 169-193. doi:10.1145/ 3709025.3712219 · DOI
- Yunfei Zhong, Jun Yang, Yixing Fan, Lixin Su, Maarten de Rijke, Ruqing Zhang, and Xueqi Cheng. 2026. Reason to Retrieve: Enhancing Query Understanding through Decomposition and Interpretation. arXiv:2509.06544 [cs.IR] https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.06544 · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
DAEDALUS: Bootstrapping Agent Memory from Self-Generated Tasks
Edy, A., Conti, M., Xing, V., Allard, M.-A., Benhamdane, N., & Viaud, G. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.08048
“A plausible reason is that useful heuristics are not necessarily semantically similar to the current step: retrieving them is an oblique retrieval problem, in which relevance is latent rather than expressed in the text (Tchuindjo et al., 2026).”
- Authors
- Tchuindjo, D., Shah, D., & Khattab, O.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2605.06235
- OpenAlex
- W7160650496
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2137603, 2138259, 2138296, 2138307, 2138286)
- San Diego Supercomputer Center (2138286, 2137603, 2138307, 2138296, 2138259)
- Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (#2138286, #2138296, 2138259, #2138307, 2137603)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Keywords
- retrieval benchmark, document retrieval, large language models, retrieval efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
