Preservation Theorems in Semiring Semantics
Open accessAbstract
We study the status of preservation theorems such as the Łoś-Tarski theorem and the homomorphism preservation theorem in the context of semiring semantics. Semiring semantics has its origins in the provenance analysis of database queries. Depending on the underlying semiring, it allows us to track which atomic facts are responsible for the truth of a statement or practical information about the evaluation such as costs or confidence. The systematic development of semiring semantics for first-order logic and other logical systems raises the question to what extent classical model-theoretic results can be generalised to this setting and how such results depend on the underlying semiring. The definitions of semantic properties such as preservation under extensions, substructures, or homomorphisms naturally generalise to the setting of semiring semantics. However, the status of the corresponding preservation theorem strongly depends on the algebraic properties of the particular semirings. We prove that these preservation theorems do indeed hold for all lattice semirings (a quite large class, encompassing practically relevant semirings and in particular all min-max semirings). The proofs combine adaptations of the classical compactness and amalgamation methods with specific reduction methods for logical entailment that have been developed in semiring semantics. On the other side, variants of the existential preservation theorem fail for many other semirings, including the tropical semiring, the Viterbi semiring, the Łukasiewicz semiring, and the natural semiring. Surprisingly, the existential preservation theorem does hold for finite interpretations in a number of semirings, including all lattice semirings. Thus, the situation for these semirings is in sharp contrast to the Boolean case, where the Łoś-Tarski theorem holds in general, but not in the finite.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Brinke et al. show classical preservation theorems lift to K-relation semantics on every lattice semiring, a class containing the Boolean reduct B but not the natural-polynomial carriers N[X], N[X]#.
“Brinke et al. [12] show classical preservation theorems lift to K-relation semantics on every lattice semiring, a class containing the Boolean reduct B but not the natural-polynomial carriers N [ 𝑋 ] , N [ 𝑋 ] # we adopt.”
From TOKI: A Bitemporal Operator Algebra for Contradiction Resolution in LLM-Agent Persistent Memory (2026) · cites this paper as [12]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
- Authors
- Brinke, S., Dawar, A., Grädel, E., & Pago, B.
- Affiliations
- RWTH Aachen University (DE)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2605.10829
- OpenAlex
- W7160890071
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Algebra and Logic
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Database Systems and Queries
- Keywords
- preservation theorems, tropical semiring, compactness, amalgamation, logical consequence, first-order logic, provenance analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review