The DOI matches its DataCite record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SkillOps: Managing LLM Agent Skill Libraries as Self-Maintaining Software Ecosystems
Abstract
Large language model agents increasingly rely on skill libraries for multi-step tasks, yet these libraries can accumulate persistent defects as skills are added, reused, patched, and linked to changing dependencies. We call this failure mode skill technical debt: library-level defects that may not break a single skill locally but can harm future retrieval, composition, and execution. Existing skill-based agents mainly focus on task-time retrieval, planning, and repair, while library-time maintenance remains underexplored. We propose SkillOps, a method-agnostic plug-in framework for maintaining skill libraries. SkillOps represents each skill as a typed Skill Contract (P, O, A, V, F), organizes skills with a Hierarchical Skill Ecosystem Graph, and diagnoses library health across utility, compatibility, risk, and validation dimensions. Given a raw skill library, SkillOps produces a maintained library that can be used by existing retrieval or planning agents without changing their internal code. On ALFWorld, SkillOps achieves 79.5 percent task success as a standalone agent, outperforming the strongest baseline by 8.8 percentage points with no additional task-time large language model calls. As a plug-in layer, it improves retrieval-heavy baselines by 0.68 to 2.90 percentage points. The current rule-based maintenance implementation uses nearly zero library-time large language model calls or tokens, showing that skill-library maintenance can be added as a low-overhead architectural layer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“From the self-evolving perspective, the skill library itself then becomes the object of evolution: agents revise skills from their own execution traces through iterative diagnose-and-revise cycles (Belikova et al., 2026), autonomously maintain library health by merging, repairing, or retiring skills to contain accumulated skill-level technical debt (Song et al., 2026), and learn which memory”
From A Survey of Agent Memory in the Second Half: Towards Self-Evolving and Long-Horizon Agents (2026) · cites this paper as Song et al., 2026
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models
Yao, S., Zhao, J., Yu, D., Du, N., Shafran, I., Narasimhan, K., & Cao, Y. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.03629 · Cited by 608
HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Face
Shen, Y., Song, K., Tan, X., Li, D., Lu, W., & Zhuang, Y. (2023) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 · doi:10.52202/075280-1657 · Cited by 475
Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIs
Patil, S., Zhang, T., Wang, X., & Gonzalez, J. (2024) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 · doi:10.52202/079017-4020 · Cited by 226
A-Mem: Agentic Memory for LLM Agents
Xu, W., Liang, Z., Mei, K., Gao, H., Tan, J., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38 · doi:10.52202/085713-0593 · Cited by 51
LEGOMem: Modular Procedural Memory for Multi-agent LLM Systems for Workflow Automation
Han, D., Couturier, C., Diaz, D. M., Zhang, X., Rühle, V., & Rajmohan, S. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.04851 · Cited by 3
Cited by
A Survey of Agent Memory in the Second Half: Towards Self-Evolving and Long-Horizon Agents
Huang, W.-C., Zhang, W., Liang, Y., Bei, Y., Chen, Y., Feng, T., Pan, X., Tan, Z., Wang, Y., Wei, T., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.06052 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Song, X., Pu, H., & Zhao, L.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- arXiv
- 2605.13716
- References
- 5
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
