Semantic Retrieval for Product Search in E-Commerce
Open accessAbstract
Semantic retrieval in e-commerce must handle short, noisy, and colloquial queries over large product catalogs with fine-grained attribute distinctions. We present a Siamese LLM dual-encoder trained through a two-stage pipeline: contrastive learning with a false-negative margin mask to prevent penalization of near-duplicate products, followed by Relative Odds Alignment for Retrieval (ROAR), a preference optimization objective that extends Bradley-Terry to variable-sized graded relevance groups via consecutive odds-ratio margins. The training corpus mirrors this progression - substitute query-product pairs provide coarse semantic supervision in Stage 1 and graded relevance annotations drive fine-grained ranking in Stage 2. The resulting system accurately retrieves exact matches while correctly ordering substitutes and complementary products, with gains confirmed across query-frequency strata and business verticals, and statistical significance validated through live A/B deployment at scale.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
- Authors
- Kothari, N., Samdani, S., Mallick, R., Gupta, P., Vijay, A., & Kumar, S.
- ORCID
- Mallick, Ritam
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2606.01504
- OpenAlex
- W7163178089
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Keywords
- semantic search, product search, e-commerce, contrastive learning, Bradley-Terry model, graded relevance, preference optimization, product substitution, complementary products
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
