PreprintCited by 1Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesReinforcement Learning in Robotics

Trajectory-Refined Distillation

Open access
Jiang, Li, Xu, Haoran, Ding, Yichuan, Zhang, Amy·2026·arXiv

Abstract

On-policy distillation (OPD) has become a central post-training tool for large language models (LLMs), providing dense per-token teacher supervision along the student's own rollouts. In this work, we identify a common structural cause underlying OPD, which we call prefix failure. Under prefix failure, dense per-token supervision induces a bimodal teacher mixture and fragmented gradients that token-level loss truncation or reweighting fail to address. We thus propose Trajectory-Refined Distillation (TRD), a trajectory-level correction method that revises the student's rollout under the teacher guidance while within on-policy support. By correcting problematic prefixes before distillation, TRD mitigates prefix failure at its source. Moreover, TRD improves exploration by exposing the student to alternative valid derivations under teacher guidance, even when the original rollouts are already correct. TRD can also be applied to on-policy self-distillation (OPSD), a parameter-sharing variant that uses the student model conditioned on privileged information as the teacher. TRD improves average math accuracy while remaining competitive on code. Under OPSD, it solves $9/23$ AMOBench questions left unsolved by the Qwen3-8B base model, nearly doubling the strongest dense-KL baseline. Code is available at https://github.com/louieworth/trd.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2606.08432

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dense per-token supervision induces a bimodal teacher mixture with fragmented gradients that no token-level loss reweighting can repair ('prefix failure'), forcing intervention at the trajectory level.

    “'prefix failure,' shows dense per-token supervision inducing a bimodal teacher mixture with fragmented gradients that no token-level loss reweighting can repair, forcing intervention at the trajectory level instead [113].”

    From Recursive Self-Improvement in AI: From Bounded Self-Refinement to Autonomous Research Loops (2026) · cites this paper as [113]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jiang, L., Xu, H., Ding, Y., & Zhang, A.
Affiliations
  • Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute (CA)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7164003456
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
on-policy distillation, large language models, teacher-student training, on-policy self-distillation, post-training fine-tuning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review