EurekAgent: Agent Environment Engineering is All You Need For Autonomous Scientific Discovery
Open accessAbstract
LLM-based agents have shown increasing potential in automating scientific discovery. Given an optimizable metric and an execution environment, they can propose, validate, and iterate scientific solutions, and have produced results that outperform human-designed approaches. As model capabilities continue to improve, we argue that the bottleneck for autonomous scientific discovery is shifting from prescribing agent workflows to designing agent environments: the resources, constraints, and interfaces that shape agent behavior. We frame this as environment engineering: building environments that amplify productive behaviors, such as open-ended exploration, systematic artifact management, and inter-agent collaboration, while suppressing harmful behaviors, such as reward hacking and high-friction human oversight. We present EurekAgent, an environment-engineered agent system for metric-driven autonomous scientific discovery. EurekAgent engineers the environment along four dimensions: permissions engineering for bounded agent execution and isolated evaluation; artifact engineering for filesystem and Git-based collaboration; budget engineering for budget-aware exploration; and human-in-the-loop engineering for easy human supervision and intervention. EurekAgent sets new state-of-the-art results on multiple mathematics, kernel engineering, and machine learning tasks, including new state-of-the-art 26-circle packing results discovered with less than $11 in total API cost. We open-source our code and results, and call for environment engineering as a core research direction for developing reliable autonomous research agents.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
EurekAgent, Heuresis, and Xcientist are attempts to move scientific judgment out of the model and into auditable structure.
“All three are, in different vocabularies, attempts to move scientific judgment out of the model and into auditable structure - the constructive response to the critique literature below.”
From Recursive Self-Improvement in AI: From Bounded Self-Refinement to Autonomous Research Loops (2026) · cites this paper as [177]
Cites
ShinkaEvolve: Towards Open-Ended And Sample-Efficient Program Evolution
Lange, R. T., Imajuku, Y., & Cetin, E. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.19349 · cited 2×
“Evolutionary systems such as AlphaEvolve explicitly maintain populations of candidate programs and use evaluator feedback to guide mutation and selection (Novikov et al., 2025; Lange et al., 2025; Liu et al., 2026b).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recursive Self-Improvement in AI: From Bounded Self-Refinement to Autonomous Research Loops
Chen, M., Wang, L., & Qu, B. (2026) · arXiv
“…agent workflows to engineering the agent’s environment — the resources, constraints, and interfaces that shape what an autonomous discoverer can do [172]; Heuresis decomposes the research pipeline into composable primitives and systematically compares search strategies over ideas, treating…”
- Authors
- Xin, A., Siow, J., Wang, J., Yao, Z., Zhang, F., Song, J., Hou, L., & Li, J.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Zhipu AI (China) (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2606.13662
- OpenAlex
- W7164525570
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Keywords
- LLM agents, autonomous scientific discovery, artifact management, human-in-the-loop, reward hacking, circle packing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review