PreprintCited by 0Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Domyn-Small: A European 10B Reasoning Language Model

Open access
Angarano, Simone, Bertolotti, Francesco, D'Ambrosio, Federico, Resta, Michele, Rognoni, Alessandro, Ruggeri, Nicolò, Salvati, Dario, Valenti, Andrea +2 more·2026·arXiv

Abstract

We introduce Domyn-Small, a 10-billion-parameter open-weight reasoning language model released under the MIT license. Domyn-Small is the product of an initial pre-training phase on 9 trillion tokens multilingual data, followed by a post-training pipeline for reasoning, instruction following, and context extension. For the latter, we performed a Continued Pre-Training (CPT) phase that doubles the native context window to 32K tokens, followed by SFT with a math-focused annealing run. Finally, the RL phase includes GRPO with verifiable rewards, DPO, and a multi-environment GRPO stage spanning five task domains: mathematics, code, multiple-choice QA, instruction-following, and tool calling. The 32K-token native context extends to 128K at inference via YaRN, and a chat-template toggle enables dual-mode reasoning. Against peer models in the 7--10B class (Qwen3.5-9B, OLMo-3-7B-Think, Nemotron-Nano-8B, Ministral-3-8B), Domyn-Small achieves a strong accuracy-efficiency balance: it produces roughly one-third as many tokens as Qwen3.5-9B and approximately 35% of OLMo-3-7B-Think's token budget on core reasoning benchmarks, while delivering strong instruction-following (IFEval 79.9) and competitive science reasoning (GPQA-Diamond 50.0). We release the weights and the post-training recipe alongside Domyn Swarm (Apache~2.0), an open-source framework for scalable LLM inference on HPC clusters developed during this program and used throughout this work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2607.20448

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

  • RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?

    Hsieh, C.-P., Sun, S., Kriman, S., Acharya, S., Rekesh, D., Jia, F., Zhang, Y., & Ginsburg, B. (2024) · arXiv · Cited by 13 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “…following (IFEval (Zhou et al., 2023)), code (HumanEval (Chen et al., 2021), LiveCodeBench (Jain et al., 2025), MBPP (Austin et al., 2021)), multilingual (MGSM (Shi et al., 2022)), long-context retrieval (RULER 32k and 64k (Hsieh et al., 2024)), and tool calling (BFCL V3 (Patil et al., 2025)).”

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Angarano, S., Bertolotti, F., D'Ambrosio, F., Resta, M., Rognoni, A., Ruggeri, N., Salvati, D., Valenti, A., Veneri, A., & Cimmino, M.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7170512324
Cited by
0
References
1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Nvidia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
reasoning language models, open-weight language models, continual pre-training, context window extension, yarn, instruction following, scientific reasoning, mathematical reasoning, code generation, tool calling, multi-choice question answering, reinforcement learning from human feedback, Group Relative Policy Optimization, DPO, post-training fine-tuning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review