The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Bridging Reinforcement Learning and Optimal Control via Feasible Action Mapping
Abstract
Operating constrained dynamical systems requires controllers to efficiently solve complex tasks while enforcing recursive feasibility and physical constraints. To address these competing requirements, we present Feasible Action for Optimal Control (FAOC), a novel control framework integrating Reinforcement Learning (RL) and Optimal Control (OC). The core contribution is a computationally efficient, optimization-based mapping algorithm that transforms the RL agent's action from a static abstract set into a state-dependent feasible parameter set of the Optimal Control Problem (OCP), guaranteeing instantaneous parameter feasibility. When paired with invariant terminal sets, FAOC guarantees strict recursive feasibility and safe operation, effectively combining the predictable safety of OC with the behavioral flexibility of RL. Unlike prior work, the abstract action space does not require expert tuning, nor is the OCP formulation compromised by the inability of RL to guarantee feasibility. We evaluate FAOC on real-time motion planning for robot table tennis, where simulated experiments demonstrate superior sample efficiency and closed-loop performance compared to state-of-the-art baselines. We open-source the used implementation of the mapping algorithm and OCP for motion planning https://github.com/SonyResearch/feasible_action_for_optimal_control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Metadata
- Authors
- Richter, S., Giammarino, A., Torrente, G., Blakeman, S., & Dürr, P.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- arXiv
- 2607.23930
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bridging Reinforcement Learning and Optimal Control via Feasible Action Mapping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2607.23930
- The paper
- Richter, S., Giammarino, A., Torrente, G., Blakeman, S., & Dürr, P. (2026). Bridging Reinforcement Learning and Optimal Control via Feasible Action Mapping. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2607.23930
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.