PreprintCited by 0Robot Manipulation and LearningReinforcement Learning in RoboticsAI-based Problem Solving and Planning

$τ_0$-VLA: a Hierarchical Robot Foundation Model with World-Model-Guided Test-Time Computation

Open access
Cai, Xiaowei, Cai, Yunuo, Chen, Bingao, Chen, Jingxiao, Chen, Zhi, Feng, Siyuan, Hou, Tengyu, Huang, Jingshun +31 more·2026·arXiv

Abstract

Long-horizon robot manipulation requires a robot to both execute individual skills reliably and sequence them coherently over extended tasks. Most hierarchical vision-language-action (VLA) models make each such decision with a single forward pass, leaving no mechanism to allocate additional computation to difficult or consequential choices. We introduce $τ_0$-VLA, a hierarchical robot foundation model that formulates high-level subtask generation as a compute-scalable inference problem through world-model-guided test-time computation. At each inference step, the high-level policy uses execution memory to generate a subtask and, when needed, searches over alternatives before committing to its output. A low-level policy then executes the generated subtask across multiple robot embodiments. The policy is trained on 40,115 hours of heterogeneous real-world data with multimodal co-training. Across in-domain and distribution-shifted settings, allocating additional test-time computation substantially improves next-subtask prediction accuracy, and these gains translate into higher closed-loop success on long-horizon robot manipulation tasks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2608.16885

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Cai, X., Cai, Y., Chen, B., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Feng, S., Hou, T., Huang, J., Jiang, H., Ju, R., Li, D., Li, M., Li, S., Li, X., Li, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, Z., Luo, J., Miao, J., Ni, R., Nie, B., Pan, M., Ren, X., Song, J., Wang, J., Wang, P., Wang, S., Wang, X., Wei, D., Wu, D., Xie, P., Yang, P., Ye, H., Yue, X., Zhang, J., Zhang, Q., Zhao, X., Zhou, P., & Zhou, Y.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Innovation Institute (CN)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7203682176
Cited by
0
References
1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Keywords
vision-language-action models, world models, distribution shift, robot embodiment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review