The DOI matches its DataCite record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AIM: A Privacy-Aware Interoperable Memory Framework for Multi-Agent Multi-User LLM Systems
Abstract
Traditional large language models (LLMs) are scoped to individual user sessions, limiting their knowledge to a single conversation and preventing them from learning user preferences that evolve over time. Existing agentic memory systems address this limitation but generally operate at the individual-user level, restricting the public knowledge that could be shared across users to improve downstream responses. We introduce AIM (Agentic Interoperable Memory), a unified, privacy-aware memory framework that enables multi-agent, multi-user LLM systems to persistently manage private and shared memory. AIM dynamically classifies information as private, scoped to one user and inaccessible to others, or public, accessible to all users. It enforces index-level access controls so that private memories are retrievable only by their owner, protecting sensitive data while allowing beneficial shared knowledge to improve coordination and consistency. We also introduce MUMBench (Multi-User Memory Benchmark), a dataset of multi-user interactions containing private and shareable information across four domains. To our knowledge, MUMBench is the first public dataset designed to evaluate multiple memory operations, including retrieval, creation, update, and deletion, in a multi-user environment. Across three independent runs on MUMBench, AIM achieves 96.0% visibility classification accuracy, 58.8% strict operation accuracy, and 70.5% state-aware operation accuracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MEM1: Learning to Synergize Memory and Reasoning for Efficient Long-Horizon Agents
Zhou, Z., Qu, A., Wu, Z., Kim, S., Prakash, A., Rus, D., Zhao, J., Low, B. K. H., & Liang, P. P. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.15841 · Cited by 218
Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM Agents
Maharana, A., Lee, D.-H., Tulyakov, S., Bansal, M., Barbieri, F., & Fang, Y. (2024) · Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.747 · Cited by 96
Cognitive Architectures for Language Agents
Sumers, T. R., Yao, S., Narasimhan, K., & Griffiths, T. L. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.02427 · Cited by 72 · cited 2×
“Yet the vast majority of agents today operate statelessly : they cannot retain structured knowledge across sessions, separate private from shareable information across users, nor exchange relevant context across heterogeneous agent platforms [Sumers et al., 2024].”
A-Mem: Agentic Memory for LLM Agents
Xu, W., Liang, Z., Mei, K., Gao, H., Tan, J., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38 · doi:10.52202/085713-0593 · Cited by 51
Unveiling Privacy Risks in LLM Agent Memory
Wang, B., He, W., Zeng, S., Xiang, Z., Xing, Y., Tang, J., & He, P. (2025) · Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1227 · Cited by 24
Unveiling Privacy Risks in LLM Agent Memory
Wang, B., He, W., Zeng, S., Xiang, Z., Xing, Y., Tang, J., & He, P. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.13172 · Cited by 23
MemInsight: Autonomous Memory Augmentation for LLM Agents
Salama, R., Cai, J., Yuan, M., Currey, A., Sunkara, M., Zhang, Y., & Benajiba, Y. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.21760 · Cited by 6
LEGOMem: Modular Procedural Memory for Multi-agent LLM Systems for Workflow Automation
Han, D., Couturier, C., Diaz, D. M., Zhang, X., Rühle, V., & Rajmohan, S. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.04851 · Cited by 3
INMS: Memory Sharing for Large Language Model based Agents
Gao, H., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.09982 · Cited by 2
Collaborative Memory: Multi-User Memory Sharing in LLM Agents with Dynamic Access Control
Rezazadeh, A., Li, Z., Lou, A., Zhao, Y., Wei, W., & Bao, Y. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.18279 · cited 1×
“Collaborative Memory [Rezazadeh et al., 2025] models user-agent permissions as bipartite graphs with dual-tier private and shared stores, explicitly identifying the need for multi-user benchmarks.”
Mem-α: Learning Memory Construction via Reinforcement Learning
Wang, Y., Takanobu, R., Liang, Z., Mao, Y., Hu, Y., McAuley, J., & Wu, X. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.25911
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, Z., Kumankumah, N. B., Chatterjee, S., Sathyamurthi, T., Chen, M., Li, X. A., Wang, X., Gelchie, E. M., Lin, J., Hasan, S. A., & Vesal, S.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- arXiv
- 2609.12320
- References
- 11
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.