The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Reduced Order Observers for Monocular Visual Inertial Odometry
Abstract
This work develops a reduced order observer framework of monocular visual-inertial odometry (VIO). The key idea consists in considering the gravity vector in the body-frame as an additional state and constructing an appropriate output that relates the monocular bearing measurements and their time derivatives to the body-frame velocity. This eliminates the need for the estimation of the landmark positions, leading to a six-dimensional linear time-varying (LTV) observer for the body-frame velocity and gravity, endowed with uniform global exponential stability guarantees. These estimates are subsequently used to recover the orientation almost globally, up to an unknown constant yaw offset, and the position up to an unknown constant translation. The mixed-bearing framework is further extended to account for the inertial measurement unit (IMU) biases, yielding a twelve-dimensional LTV observer endowed with local exponential stability guarantees. Numerical simulations are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed observers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Metadata
- Authors
- Abi, A., Boughellaba, M., Wang, M., & Tayebi, A.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- arXiv
- 2609.26612
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reduced Order Observers for Monocular Visual Inertial Odometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2609.26612
- The paper
- Abi, A., Boughellaba, M., Wang, M., & Tayebi, A. (2026). Reduced Order Observers for Monocular Visual Inertial Odometry. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2609.26612
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
