CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1

RegenHarness: A Robot Agent Harness with Evidence-Gated Recursive Self-Improvement

Wang, Kailin, Jie, Haoxiang, Yan, Yaoyuan, Heng, Zhiyou, Li, Zhaosong·2026·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2609.27612arXiv 2609.27612
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Long-horizon robot execution requires a clear distinction between a model's proposal, a controller's termination, and verified task completion. We present RegenHarness, an evidence-gated robot-agent harness connecting task planning to heterogeneous robot skills. Its execution architecture couples a model loop for context-conditioned proposals with an agent loop for dispatch, observation, verification, commitment, and bounded recovery. Four role-isolated contexts separate planning, supervision, verification, and recovery inputs. Versioned memory distinguishes observed facts from accepted task progress, while an identity- and version-bound commit gate controls updates to trusted task state. The runtime combines duplicate-dispatch control, resource leases, and recovery budgets under explicit backend contracts, and checks the original user goal before reporting completion. To our knowledge, we are the first to introduce an evidence-gated recursive self-improvement (RSI) protocol for embodied robotic agents. Across missions, execution records motivate candidate changes to context rules, task templates, routing, and recovery policies; fixed regression checks and release authorization govern their acceptance; versioned rollout and rollback preserve configuration traceability. This RSI protocol revises the harness configuration without online model-weight updates or permission to weaken the commit gate. A real quadruped deployment documents voice-triggered warehouse navigation, panoramic inspection, visual analysis, message delivery, return, and spoken reporting through linked audio, images, trajectories, and receipts. A separate circuit demonstrates why completion depends on execution history rather than endpoint proximity alone. Together, the cases demonstrate integrated perception, physical execution, communication, and history-dependent completion in real-world robot tasks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2609.27612

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RegenHarness adds an evidence-gated recursive-improvement loop for a robot harness: candidate configuration changes pass fixed regressions and release authorization before versioned rollout or rollback, and the system is exercised on a real quadruped.

    “RegenHarness adds an evidence-gated recursive-improvement loop for a robot harness: candidate configuration changes pass fixed regressions and release authorization before versioned rollout or rollback, and the system is exercised on a real quadruped [30].”

    From Authorization for Self-Modifying AI Agent Populations: Conserving Authority across Replacement, Forking, and Rollback (2026) · cites this paper as [30]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. [1][1] Michael Ahn, Anthony Brohan, Noah Brown, Yevgen Chebotar, Omar Cortes, Byron David, Chelsea Finn, Chuyuan Fu, Keerthana Gopalakrishnan, Karol Hausman, et al. Do as I can, not as I say: Grounding language in robotic affordances. In Conference on Robot Learning , 2022. -
  2. [3][3] Loan Bernat, Matthieu Grard, Ariane Herbulot, and Florent Lamiraux. MAGMA-GEN: Validated recovery supervision from ambiguous failures via counterfactual re-execution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2609.20056 , 2026. - · arXiv
  3. [4][4] Kevin Black, Noah Brown, Danny Driess, Adnan Esmail, Michael Equi, Chelsea Finn, Niccolo Fusai, Lachy Groom, Karol Hausman, Brian Ichter, et al. π 0 : A vision-language-action flow model for general robot control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24164 , 2024. - · arXiv
  4. [5][5] Anthony Brohan, Noah Brown, Justice Carbajal, Yevgen Chebotar, Xi Chen, Krzysztof Choromanski, Tianli Ding, Danny Driess, Avinava Dubey, Chelsea Finn, et al. RT-2: Vision-language-action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.15818 , 2023. - · arXiv
  5. [6][6] Jiafei Duan, Wilbert Pumacay, Nishanth Kumar, Yi Ru Wang, Shulin Tian, Wentao Yuan, Ranjay Krishna, Dieter Fox, Ajay Mandlekar, and Yijie Guo. AHA: A vision-language-model for detecting and reasoning over failures in robotic manipulation. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2025. -
  6. [7][7] Caelan Reed Garrett, Rohan Chitnis, Rachel Holladay, Beomjoon Kim, Tom Silver, Leslie Pack Kaelbling, and Tom´ as Lozano-P´ erez. Integrated task and motion planning. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems , 4:265-293, 2021. -
  7. [8][8] Shangding Gu. From model scaling to system scaling: Scaling the harness in agentic AI. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.26112 , 2026. - · arXiv
  8. [9][9] Wenlong Huang, Pieter Abbeel, Deepak Pathak, and Igor Mordatch. Inner monologue: Embodied reasoning through planning with language models. In Conference on Robot Learning , 2022. -
  9. [10][10] Wenlong Huang, Chen Wang, Yunzhu Li, Ruohan Zhang, and Li Fei-Fei. ReKep: Spatio-temporal reasoning of relational keypoint constraints for robotic manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.01652 , 2024. - · arXiv
  10. [12][12] Moo Jin Kim, Karl Pertsch, Siddharth Karamcheti, Ted Xiao, Ashwin Balakrishna, Suraj Nair, Rafael Rafailov, Ethan Foster, Pannag Sanketi, Quan Vuong, et al. OpenVLA: An open-source vision-language-action model. In Conference on Robot Learning , 2024. -
  11. [13][13] Sanghoon Lee, Jiyeong Chae, and Kyung-Joon Park. Harness engineering for physical AI: Robot middleware is the harness layer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.09416 , 2026. - · arXiv
  12. [14][14] Lin Liu, Zhicheng Bao, Lu Zhang, Ziying Song, Wu Yang, Yuzheng Zhuang, Shuai Tao, Wulong Liu, Caiyan Jia, and Huchuan Lu. LIBERO-RECOVER: Beyond task success towards failure recovery in robotic manipulation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2609.05178 , 2026. - · arXiv
  13. [15][15] Yang Liu, Weixing Chen, Xinshuai Song, Tao Pu, Siwen Mo, Yongjie Bai, Zihao Chen, Qianran Sun, Liruo Zhong, Ying Shen, and Liang Lin. PhyAgentOS: A self-evolving operating system for embodied agents with decoupled cognitive planning and physical execution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.16636 , 2026. - · arXiv
  14. [16][16] Zeyi Liu, Arpit Bahety, and Shuran Song. REFLECT: Summarizing robot experiences for failure explanation and correction. In Proceedings of The 7th Conference on Robot Learning , volume 229 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 3468-3484. PMLR, 2023. -
  15. [17][17] Steven Macenski, Tully Foote, Brian Gerkey, Chris Lalancette, and William Woodall. Robot operating system 2: Design, architecture, and uses in the wild. Science Robotics , 7(66), 2022. -
  16. [19][19] Physical Intelligence, Kevin Black, Noah Brown, James Darpinian, Karan Dhabalia, Danny Driess, Adnan Esmail, Michael Equi, Chelsea Finn, Niccolo Fusai, et al. π 0 . 5 : A vision-language-action model with open-world generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16054 , 2025. - · arXiv
  17. [21][21] Kailin Wang, Haoxiang Jie, Yaoyuan Yan, Jiacheng Zhou, and Zhiyou Heng. EV-WM: Event-verified world models for long-horizon robotic manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.13053 , 2026. - · arXiv
  18. [22][22] Kailin Wang, Haoxiang Jie, Yaoyuan Yan, Jiacheng Zhou, and Zhiyou Heng. Ontology-grounded world models for failure diagnosis and closed-loop repair in physical AI systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.13901 , 2026. - · arXiv
  19. [23][23] Wei Wang, Wenqiao Zhang, Yutong Lin, Yuqian Yuan, Tianwei Lin, Jinhao Mao, Zhenxuan Fan, Mingjian Gao, Yang Dai, Wentong Li, Zheqi Lv, Zheng Dong, Yingjie Niu, Jiaqi Zhu, Jun Xiao, Chao Li, and Yueting Zhuang. EmbodiedSkills: A unified framework for orchestrating, training, and deploying VLA agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2609.01281 , 2026. - · arXiv
  20. [24][24] Yaoyuan Yan, Zhiyou Heng, Haoxiang Jie, Gang Liu, Hongjie Yan, and Wei Zhou. Harness Robotic OS: A unified embodied-agent runtime for closed-loop quadruped inspection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2609.11225 , 2026. - · arXiv
  21. [25][25] Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. ReAct: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2023. -
  22. [27][27] Zixiang Zhao, Yansong Feng, Yang Yang, Chaoyu Wang, Haoran Xiao, Hui Zhang, Chuang Cheng, and Jianjun Ma. CommitFlow: Semantic commitment verification and local correction for long-horizon robot manipulation VLA execution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2609.21908 , 2026. - · arXiv
  23. [28][28] Xiaolin Zhou, Liu Liu, Tingyang Xiao, Wei Feng, Fa Fu, Xinrui Meng, Xinjie Wang, Jialiang Han, Boyang Yu, Yun Du, Wei Sui, and Zhizhong Su. HoloAgent-0: A unified embodied agent framework with 3D spatial memory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.23565 , 2026. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, K., Jie, H., Yan, Y., Heng, Z., & Li, Z.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2609.27612
arXiv
2609.27612
References
2
Type
Preprint
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review