When Sub-Agents Work in Parallel: The Promises and Pitfalls of Dynamic Concurrency in Long-Horizon Coding Tasks
Open accessAbstract
As coding agents advance from bounded software engineering tasks toward long horizon development, dynamic concurrency offers a promising way to scale complex development tasks. Under this policy, agents decide during execution whether and how to spawn concurrent sub-agents. Model capability largely determines outcomes on shorter tasks, whereas long horizon development makes orchestration central to task completion. Existing work, focused on coding agent failures on shorter tasks or collaboration in predefined multiagent workflows, offers little insight into dynamic concurrency in frontier agents across task complexity. We study dynamic concurrency as an execution policy through controlled comparisons of matched Codex, Claude Code, and Kimi Code executions with the policy enabled or disabled. Across 354 tasks and 2,124 executions spanning a range of task complexities and execution horizons, we evaluate its end to end effects and scheduling behavior, and analyze matched trajectories to characterize 13 concurrency specific failure modes, 28 observable patterns, and the conditions under which it provides an advantage.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
ProgramBench: Can Language Models Rebuild Programs From Scratch?
Yang, J., Lieret, K., Ma, J., Thakkar, P., Pedchenko, D., Sootla, S., McMilin, E., Yin, P., Hou, R., Synnaeve, G., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.03546 · cited 5×
“In contrast, dynamic concurrency is particularly intended to support long-horizon and open-ended coding tasks, such as repository-level generation [17, 63, 67] and software release development [30], where the coding agents are expected to generate tens of thousands of lines of code per task.”
Influential
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Li, H., Li, H., Jiang, Z., & Lou, Y.
- ORCID
- Lou, Yiling
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2610.10263
- OpenAlex
- W7220989604
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
- Keywords
- coding agents, agent orchestration, execution policy, task complexity, failure modes, agent scheduling, codices, Claude Code, LLM agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
