TNGC-SIDM I: Evolution of massive cluster mergers under the self-interacting dark matter paradigm
Open accessAbstract
Merging galaxy clusters provide an ideal laboratory for testing the self-interacting nature of dark matter. In this paper, we present a pilot study of magnetohydrodynamical cosmological zoom-in simulations of two cluster mergers selected from TNG-Cluster, with $M_{\rm 200c} \sim 9\times10^{14}~M_\odot$ and $M_{\rm 200c}\sim 2\times10^{14}~M_\odot$. The simulations are performed with both standard collisionless cold dark matter (CDM) and self-interacting dark matter (SIDM), assuming an isotropic, velocity-independent cross-section of $σ_{\rm T}/m_χ= 1~\rm cm^2~g^{-1}$, with an additional $0.5~\rm cm^2~g^{-1}$ run for the low-mass system, and the mass resolution and galaxy formation model are unchanged from TNG-Cluster. We show how dark matter self-interactions produce an isothermal core in the dark matter halo, generate unique substructures in the intracluster light, and introduce variation in the multi-wavelength observables of the intracluster plasma. Using these simulations, we test the validity of observational probes for dark matter self-interactions in cluster mergers. We find that the shock-to-shock separation shows similar evolution in the self-interaction models tested here, providing a reference for distinguishing the $\sim100-200~\rm kpc$-scale difference in halo separation induced by self-interactions. Moreover, the dark matter halo centroid of the main cluster in the massive cluster merger is offset from the brightest cluster galaxy by as much as $\sim20~\rm kpc$, larger than the offset in the sub-cluster. This offset persists beyond 4 Gyr after the first pericenter passage. Our results indicate that sample selection plays a key role in testing the possible self-interacting nature of dark matter using cluster mergers, and that double radio relic cluster mergers and massive clusters with evidence of an ancient major merger offer a promising testbed for this purpose.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
- Authors
- Lee, W., Nelson, D., Jee, M. J., Despali, G., Vogelsberger, M., Pillepich, A., Roche, C., Finner, K., Joo, H., Nagai, D., & ZuHone, J.
- Affiliations
- Yonsei University (KR)
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
- Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (DE)
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2610.18957
- OpenAlex
- W7222348472
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- European Commission (101087822)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (NE 2441 1-1)
- Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information
- National Research Foundation of Korea (2022R1A2C1003130, RS-2025-00437358, RS-2024-00340949)
- Institute for Basic Science
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Keywords
- self-interacting dark matter, cluster mergers, intracluster medium, brightest cluster galaxies, zoom-in cosmological simulations, dark matter self-interaction cross section
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review