PreprintCited by 0IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksIoT Networks and Protocols

Making the Telemetry Pipeline Measurable: An Edge IoT Testbed and Dataset for End-to-End Latency, Provenance, and Energy-Aware Benchmarking

Open access
Gkoulis, Dimitris·2026·arXiv

Abstract

Edge-centric IoT systems are increasingly evaluated through sensor values or platform features, yet the telemetry pipeline itself, the sequence of sensing, serialization, message mediation, ingestion, and persistence, is rarely released as a measurable object. This limits reproducible benchmarking of timeliness, provenance, and operational cost, especially in early-stage IoT design where real deployments and high-quality open data are often unavailable. I present a measurement-first edge IoT testbed and dataset that elevate timeliness, provenance, and energy to first-class telemetry dimensions. The testbed operationalizes a role-based event-driven architecture with explicit Source-Broker-Aggregator responsibilities and a schema-governed TelemetryMessage envelope (Avro) that embeds correlation identifiers and a uniform, cross-role vocabulary of stage-level timestamps. To trace mediation effects, I extend an MQTT broker (Eclipse Mosquitto) with a plugin that annotates messages with high-precision ingress/egress timestamps. I release the dataset in a dual representation: (i) replayable raw events as compressed Avro streams and (ii) analysis-ready long-format Parquet tables partitioned for efficient query and benchmarking, generated by a deterministic raw-to-tabular transformation pipeline. The contribution is an integrated engineering artifact and dataset built from established components. The demonstration describes one deployment through latency summaries, measurement-context distributions, and energy aggregates; it does not establish a new attribution method or a controlled performance benchmark. By co-releasing heterogeneous telemetry with pipeline timing and energy signals in both replayable and queryable forms, the artifact provides a basis for reproducible exploratory analysis and subsequent benchmarking studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2610.35591

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Authors
Gkoulis, D.
Affiliations
Harokopio University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
Gkoulis, Dimitris
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7223918922
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › IoT Networks and Protocols
Keywords
edge IoT, end-to-end delay, provenance, energy consumption, benchmarking, IoT testbed, datasets, Avro, MQTT broker, event-driven architecture, timestamping, Parquet, reproducibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review