The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
bf16 Rounding Silently Discards Most RL Policy Updates: A Hidden Training-Inference Mismatch and an Unbiased One-Line Fix
Abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) post-training of language models keeps fp32 master weights in the optimizer and serves rollouts from a bf16 copy produced by round-to-nearest conversion. At the learning rates in common use, most per-step updates are smaller than half a bf16 spacing and the conversion discards them: on Qwen3-1.7B only 0.4-0.5% of served weights change per step, and the policy that generates the training data lags the optimizer by 50-150 steps. Existing mismatch corrections cannot see this lag because they compare two copies downstream of the same rounding. We propose Fair Cast: export the master with an unbiased rounding rule (stochastic rounding or error feedback) and compute the training loss on the served copy. The change is one line at the export call, adds no hyperparameters and costs 22-38 ms per export of 1.7B parameters. Across 25 matched seed-pairs on Qwen3-0.6B to 4B with AdamW and Muon, Fair Cast is ahead on 18, tied on 6 and behind on 1, with a mean gain of 6.1 points; on zebra puzzles it reaches 0.57 +/- 0.16 over four runs where round-to-nearest collapses to 0.33 +/- 0.10. It also makes the saved fp32 checkpoint agree with the served model, and it exposes the implicit lag of round-to-nearest as a regularizer that can be restored explicitly when a task needs it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, A., & Gao, W.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- arXiv
- 2610.41073
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: bf16 Rounding Silently Discards Most RL Policy Updates: A Hidden Training-Inference Mismatch and an Unbiased One-Line Fix. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2610.41073
- The paper
- Gao, A., & Gao, W. (2026). bf16 Rounding Silently Discards Most RL Policy Updates: A Hidden Training-Inference Mismatch and an Unbiased One-Line Fix. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2610.41073
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.