Preprint

The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Reinforcement Twinning via Twin-Calibrated Bayesian Policy Search and Replay-Driven Identification

Mendez, Miguel A., Schena, Lorenzo, Poletti, Romain, Lecomte, Yannick, Randino, Sebastiano, Berghe, Jan van den·2026·arXiv

Abstract

The feasibility of updating and synchronising digital twins of actuated systems from operational data depends strongly on how the system is controlled and, consequently, on the data generated during operation. This establishes a direct link between control actuation and model identifiability. This work presents a reinforcement-twinning framework that exploits this link through three computational components. A Gaussian-process surrogate of the physical return combines the twin prediction, used as a calibrated trend, with a discrepancy learned from measured returns, allowing Bayesian policy search to exploit the twin without being tied to its predictions. Candidate policies are proposed around the policy that is optimal for the twin, while measured returns can expand this region. The resulting physical episodes are replayed on the twin after observer-based synchronisation with sparse measurements, and its parameters are identified by combining Bayesian optimisation with gradient-based refinement. Selected information-oriented episodes deploy an excitation policy to improve parameter identifiability. The framework is demonstrated on a Burgers-flow analogue of dynamic-induction control in wind farms, with a deliberately misspecified model structure. Despite substantially biased return predictions, the twin provides a useful starting policy and search region, placing the guided search ahead of unguided Bayesian optimisation from its first physical evaluations. This advantage is maintained when the search region is allowed to expand in response to changes in measured returns, whereas searches over-constrained by the twin-defined region are eventually overtaken by the unguided alternatives. The results support reinforcement twinning as a framework for jointly adapting models and control policies when physical interaction is limited and model discrepancy cannot be neglected.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2611.03540

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Mendez, M. A., Schena, L., Poletti, R., Lecomte, Y., Randino, S., & Berghe, J. V. D.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
Type
Preprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reinforcement Twinning via Twin-Calibrated Bayesian Policy Search and Replay-Driven Identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2611.03540
The paper
Mendez, M. A., Schena, L., Poletti, R., Lecomte, Y., Randino, S., & Berghe, J. V. D. (2026). Reinforcement Twinning via Twin-Calibrated Bayesian Policy Search and Replay-Driven Identification. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2611.03540