The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Corpus-Based Investigation of Definite Description Use
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Guitton, H., & Siegel, S. (1958) · Revue économique · doi:10.2307/3498751 · Cited by 35,245
Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank
Marcus, M. (1993) · doi:10.21236/ada273556 · Cited by 7,405
The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases
Heim, I. (1982) · ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8100764 · Cited by 2,990
Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse
Grosz, B. J., & Sidner, C. L. (1986) · doi:10.5555/12457.12458 · Cited by 2,580
Barwise, J., & Perry, J. (1981) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2026578 · Cited by 2,352
FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR
Francis, W. N., Kučera, H., & Mackie, A. W. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,310
Assessing Agreement on Classification Tasks: The Kappa Statistic
Carletta, J. (1996) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.cmp-lg/9602004 · Cited by 2,088
Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. (1993) · Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-2066-1 · Cited by 1,988
Definite reference and mutual knowledge
Clark, H. H. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,443
Toward a taxonomy of given-new information
Prince, E. F. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,302
Cited by
Savova, G. K., Masanz, J. J., Ogren, P. V., Zheng, J., Sohn, S., Kipper-Schuler, K. C., & Chute, C. G. (2010) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/jamia.2009.001560 · Cited by 1,967
Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics
Artstein, R., & Poesio, M. (2008) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli.07-034-r2 · Cited by 1,665
Self-citationThe Oxford Handbook of Information Structure
(2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642670.001.0001 · Cited by 423
Revisiting readability: a unified framework for predicting text quality
Pitler, E., & Nenkova, A. (2008) · Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - EMNLP '08 · doi:10.3115/1613715.1613742 · Cited by 375
Pakhomov, S. V. S., Smith, G. E., Chacon, D., Feliciano, Y., Graff-Radford, N., Caselli, R., & Knopman, D. S. (2010) · Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology · doi:10.1097/wnn.0b013e3181c5dde3 · Cited by 64
“…annotation of linguistic features in spontaneous speech samples is a very labor intensive process and is subject to variable agreement among the annotators particularly in content analysis involving multiple semantic categories(Artstein & Poesio, 2008; Krippendorff, 2004; Poesio & Vieira, 1998).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Poesio, M., & Vieira, R. L. R.
- Venue
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Publisher
- Cornell University
- Published
- 1997-10-24
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 183-216
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- cmp-lg/9710007
- OpenAlex
- W1528859321
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 25
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Corpus-Based Investigation of Definite Description Use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.cmp-lg/9710007
- The paper
- Poesio, M., & Vieira, R. L. R. (1997). A Corpus-Based Investigation of Definite Description Use. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.cmp-lg/9710007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
