The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Inflationary spacetimes are not past-complete
Open accessAbstract
Many inflating spacetimes are likely to violate the weak energy condition, a key assumption of singularity theorems. Here we offer a simple kinematical argument, requiring no energy condition, that a cosmological model which is inflating -- or just expanding sufficiently fast -- must be incomplete in null and timelike past directions. Specifically, we obtain a bound on the integral of the Hubble parameter over a past-directed timelike or null geodesic. Thus inflationary models require physics other than inflation to describe the past boundary of the inflating region of spacetime.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If one tries to extend the eternal inflation argument backwards in time to allow an always expanding inflationary universe, it apparently fails.
“If one tries to extend this argument backwards in time to allow an always expanding inflationary universe it apparently fails [31].”
From Entropic Issues in Contemporary Cosmology (2003) · cites this paper as [31]
If the collapsing epochs are only a small disturbance from mostly expanding behaviour, a geodesic incompleteness theorem could be readily obtained.
“Also if the collapsing epochs are only a small disturbance from mostly expanding behaviour ( as claimed when working with the brane scale factors ) a geodesic incompleteness theorem could also be readily obtained cf. [31].”
From Entropic Issues in Contemporary Cosmology (2003) · cites this paper as [31]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Black holes and the multiverse
Garriga, J., Vilenkin, A., & Zhang, J. (2016) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/02/064 · Cited by 173
Self-citationIn What Sense Is the Early Universe Fine-Tuned?
Carroll, S. M. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.3057 · Cited by 87
Entropic Issues in Contemporary Cosmology
COULE, D. H. (2003) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271803003530 · Cited by 6
Geodesically complete cyclic cosmologies and entropy
Pavlović, P., & Sossich, M. (2024) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12621-z · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Borde, A., Guth, A. H., & Vilenkin, A.
- Affiliations
- Tufts University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 151301-151301
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- gr-qc/0110012
- OpenAlex
- W2098001159
- Cited by
- 594
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 7.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Advanced Differential Geometry Research
- Keywords
- singularity theorems, weak energy condition, Hubble parameter, null geodesics, timelike geodesics, cosmological models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
