The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Three dimensional loop quantum gravity: physical scalar product and spin foam models
Abstract
In this paper, we address the problem of the dynamics in three dimensional loop quantum gravity with zero cosmological constant. We construct a rigorous definition of Rovelli's generalized projection operator from the kinematical Hilbert space--corresponding to the quantization of the infinite dimensional kinematical configuration space of the theory--to the physical Hilbert space. In particular, we provide the definition of the physical scalar product which can be represented in terms of a sum over (finite) spin-foam amplitudes. Therefore, we establish a clear-cut connection between the canonical quantization of three dimensional gravity and spin-foam models. We emphasize two main properties of the result: first that no cut-off in the kinematical degrees of freedom of the theory is introduced (in contrast to standard `lattice' methods), and second that no ill-defined sum over spins (`bubble' divergences) are present in the spin foam representation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A recent step toward projecting out physical states in Euclidean quantum gravity has the ultimate effect of reducing spin network states to loop states.
“An interesting step toward projecting out the physical states has recently been taken in [216], in the context of Euclidean quantum gravity; the ultimate effect is to reduce spin network states to loop states of the sort we have considered above.”
From Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe (2005) · cites this paper as [216]
Section 3.2.4 (page unavailable) describes a projection onto physical states and the simplification of graphs by eliminating irreducible loops. But it says the resulting basis consists of spin network states, not loop states; the paper addresses three-dimensional gravity rather than Euclidean quantum gravity generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- A. Ashtekar and J. Lewandowski. Background independent quantum gravity: A status report. preprint, 2002.
- C. Rovelli. Quantum Gravity. Cambridge University Press, to appear, available at www.cpt.univ-mrs.fr/ rovelli, 2004.
- T. Thiemann. Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity. Cambridge University Press, to appear available at gr-qc/0110034, 2004. · arXiv
- A. Perez M. Bojowald. Spin foam quantization and anomalies. gr-qc/0303026, 2003. · arXiv
- S. Carlip. Quantum gravity in 2+1 dimensions. Cambridge, UK: Univ. Pr. (1998) 276 p.
- E. R. Livine, A. Perez and C. Rovelli, 2D manifold-independent spinfoam theory. Class. Quant. Grav. 20, 4425 (2003).
- R. De Pietri, "Canonical 'loop' quantum gravity and spin foam models," arXiv:gr-qc/9903076. · arXiv
- A. Mikovic, "Flat spacetime vacuum in loop quantum gravity," Class. Quant. Grav. 21 (2004) 3909 [arXiv:gr-qc/0404021]. · arXiv
- K. Noui A. Perez. Three dimensional loop quantum gravity: coupling with particles. gr-qc/0402111. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe
Carlip, S. (2005) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2005-1 · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Noui, K., & Perez, A.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2004
- arXiv
- gr-qc/0402110
- References
- 0
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review